Alexander F. Burnett

Dr. Alexander F. Burnett


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2009 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlexander F. Burnett
Alexander F. Burnett
PSP.J. Stone
P.J. Stone
LDL.A. Duckworth
L.A. Duckworth
JRJ.J. Roman
J.J. Roman

1 December 2013 in Radiation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlexander F. Burnett
Alexander F. Burnett
PBPrabath G. Biju
Prabath G. Biju
HLHuanli Lui
Huanli Lui
MHMartin Hauer-Jensen
Martin Hauer-Jensen
Countermeasures against radiation are critically needed. Ideally, these measures would be easy to store, easy to administer and have minimal toxicity. We used oral delivery of interleukin 11 (IL11) in mice exposed to lethal doses of total-body irradiation (TBI). Animals were given IL11 by gavage at various daily doses beginning 24 h after TBI, which continued for 5 days. At a TBI of 9.0 Gy, mice treated with IL11 had a 70% survival at 30 days compared with control group survival of 25% (P = 0.035). At 10.0 Gy, treated animals had 50% survival at 30 days compared with no survivors in the control group. Treated animals had significant improvement in intestinal mucosal surface area and crypt survival. In addition bacterial translocation of coliform bacteria was significantly less in the treated animals. Systemic absorption of IL11 was low in treated animals and effects on the hematopoietic cells were not seen. Serum citrulline levels rebounded significantly faster after irradiation in the IL11 treated animals, indicating quicker recovery of small intestine health. These data suggest that IL11 given orally protects the intestinal mucosa from radiation damage and that this compound is beneficial as a mitigating agent even when started 24 h after radiation exposure.

1 February 2006 in Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlexander F. Burnett
Alexander F. Burnett
Fertility preservation in early cervical cancer by radical trachelectomy is gaining in acceptance as more cases are published in the literature. Controversies regarding technique and patient management are beginning to emerge as the procedure moves from being a new surgery to a part of standard of care. As the number of cases reported in the literature increases, the effectiveness of radical trachelectomy for treating selected early-stage cancers continues to gain support. The survival of selected patients appears to be no different than that of similar patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Central recurrence in the residual cervix is a very rare event as long as the specimen has cleared the cancer. Patient selection criteria have evolved, and a more liberal use of the procedure is warranted. The effectiveness of trachelectomy in preserving fertility has now been demonstrated in series of 50 and 56 pregnancies occurring after the procedure. These larger series detail pregnancy outcomes and will be invaluable information to our patients who wish to maintain their ability to bear children. Subtle differences in technique between centers may account for different pregnancy outcomes. As more physicians begin to perform radical trachelectomy, controlled trials will be necessary to refine the procedure in order to continue to improve obstetric and oncologic outcomes. Radical trachelectomy will continue to increase in popularity as more physicians become willing to learn the technique. It should routinely be offered to young women with early cervix cancer who desire to maintain their fertility.

1 February 2016 in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CHChristopher Hall
Christopher Hall
RSRebecca L. Stone
Rebecca L. Stone
AGAshita Gehlot
Ashita Gehlot
KZKristin K. Zorn
Kristin K. Zorn
ABAlexander F. Burnett
Alexander F. Burnett

1 October 2004 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlexander F. Burnett
Alexander F. Burnett
AOAnne T. O'Meara
Anne T. O'Meara
ABAfshin Bahador
Afshin Bahador
LRLynda D. Roman
Lynda D. Roman
CMC. Paul Morrow
C. Paul Morrow

1 January 2020 in Reproductive Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJohn Mark P Pabona
John Mark P Pabona
ABAlexander F. Burnett
Alexander F. Burnett
DBDustin M Brown
Dustin M Brown
CQCharles M Quick
Charles M Quick
Frank A SimmenFrank A Simmen
Frank A Simmen
Rosalia C.M. SimmenRosalia C.M. Simmen
Rosalia C.M. Simmen
Metformin (MET) is increasingly implicated in reducing the incidence of multiple cancer types in patients with diabetes. However, similar effects of MET in non-diabetic women with endometrial cancer (EC) remain unknown. In a pilot study, obese non-diabetic women diagnosed with type 1, grade 1/2 EC, and consenting to participate were randomly assigned to receive MET or no MET (control (CON)) during the pre-surgical window between diagnosis and hysterectomy. Endometrial tumors obtained at surgery (MET, n = 4; CON, n = 4) were analyzed for proliferation (Ki67), apoptosis (TUNEL), and nuclear expression of ERα, PGR, PTEN, and KLF9 proteins in tumor glandular epithelial (GE) and stromal (ST) cells. The percentages of immunopositive cells for PGR and for KLF9 in GE and for PTEN in ST were higher while those for ERα in GE but not ST were lower, in tumors of MET vs. CON patients. The numbers of Ki67- and TUNEL-positive cells in tumor GE and ST did not differ between groups. In human Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells, MET treatment (60 μM) decreased cell numbers and elicited distinct temporal changes in ESR1, KLF9, PGR, PGR-B, KLF4, DKK1, and other tumor biomarker mRNA levels. In the context of reduced KLF9 expression (by siRNA targeting), MET rapidly amplified PGR, PGR-B, and KLF4 transcript levels. Our findings suggest that MET acts directly in EC cells to modify steroid receptor expression and signaling network and may constitute a preventative strategy against EC in high-risk non-diabetic women.