Yu Tian

Prof. Yu Tian

Tongji University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJianming Ling
Jianming Ling
FWFulu Wei
Fulu Wei
HZHongduo Zhao
Hongduo Zhao
YTYu Tian
Yu Tian
BHBingye Han
Bingye Han
ZCZhi'ANg Chen
Zhi'ANg Chen

1 August 2019 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HZHongduo Zhao
Hongduo Zhao
Difei WuDifei Wu
Difei Wu
MZMengyuan Zeng
Mengyuan Zeng
YTYu Tian
Yu Tian
JLJianming Ling
Jianming Ling

24 October 2025 in International Journal of Pavement Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLShifu Liu
Shifu Liu
LZLiguo Zhu
Liguo Zhu
YTYu Tian
Yu Tian
THTianxin Hou
Tianxin Hou
JLJianming Ling
Jianming Ling
SLSheng Lin
Sheng Lin

1 May 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJiawen Liu
Jiawen Liu
HLHui Li
Hui Li
Lijun SunLijun Sun
Lijun Sun
HZHengji Zhang
Hengji Zhang
NXNing Xie
Ning Xie
YZYaoting Zhu
Yaoting Zhu

12 April 2021 in International Journal of Pavement Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLShifu Liu
Shifu Liu
JLJianming Ling
Jianming Ling
YTYu Tian
Yu Tian
JQJinsong Qian
Jinsong Qian
This study was undertaken to develop a new index, the Main Landing Gear Cumulative Stroke (MLGCS) index, to evaluate airport runway roughness. Using ADAMS/Aircraft software, we first developed and validated a virtual prototype model of the Boeing B737-800 aircraft and then employed the model to predict the aircraft’s dynamic responses with regard to roughness. Using this prototype model and comparing it to the International Roughness Index (IRI) that is designed to evaluate roadway roughness, we established a landing gear cumulative stroke (LGCS) model to represent runway roughness. The results show that taxiing speed is an important factor using the LGCS model. According to the most unfavorable scenario, we determined the LGCS of the nose landing gear to be 100 km/h and that of the main landing gear to be 60 km/h. These results underscore that, based on correlation analysis, using the cumulative stroke of the main landing gear is more reasonable than using that of the nose landing gear to evaluate runway roughness. Furthermore, based on measured data for 37 runways, a comparison of commonly used roughness indices indicates that the MLGCS index proposed in this paper is superior to both the Boeing Bump Index and the IRI.

18 February 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YTYu Tian
Yu Tian
SLShifu Liu
Shifu Liu
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
PXPeng Xiang
Peng Xiang
Pavement roughness is a critical airport pavement characteristic that has been linked to impacts such as safety and service life. A properly defined roughness evaluation method would reduce airport operational risk, prolong the life of aircraft landing gear, and optimize the decision-making process for pavement preservation, which together positively contribute to overall airport sustainability. In this study, we optimized the parameters of the International Roughness Index (IRI) model to resolve the current poor correlation between the IRI and aircraft vibration responses in order to adapt and extend the IRI’s use for airport runway roughness evaluation. We developed and validated a virtual prototype model based on ADAMS/Aircraft software for the Boeing 737–800 and then employed the model to predict the aircraft’s dynamic responses to runway pavement roughness. By developing a frequency response function for the standard 1/4 vehicle model, we obtained frequency response distribution curves for the IRI. Based on runway roughness data, we used fast Fourier transform to implement the frequency response distribution of the aircraft. We then utilized Particle Swarm Optimization to determine more appropriate IRI model parameters rather than modifying the model itself. Our case study results indicate that the correlation coefficient for the optimized IRI model and aircraft vibration response shows a qualitative leap from that of the original IRI model.