Sara Prims

Mrs. Sara Prims

University of Antwerp
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2019 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CHCharlotte Vanden Hole
Charlotte Vanden Hole
Miriam AyusoMiriam Ayuso
Miriam Ayuso
PAPeter Aerts
Peter Aerts
SPSara Prims
Sara Prims
SCSteven J. Van Cruchten
Steven J. Van Cruchten
CGChris Van Ginneken
Chris Van Ginneken
In the pig, intrauterine crowding can greatly affect postnatal characteristics, among which birth weight and locomotion. In a previous study, we discovered that piglets with a low birth weight/low vitality (L piglets) have a reduced motor performance compared to piglets with a normal birth weight/normal vitality (N piglets). A possible explanation is that L piglets lack the energy to increase their motor performance to the level of that of N piglets. Blood glucose levels (GLU) and glycogen concentrations in skeletal muscle of the front (GLYFRONT) and hind leg (GLYHIND) and the liver (GLYLIVER) at birth and during the first 96 h postpartum were compared between L and N piglets. GLU at birth was the same for both groups. After birth, GLU immediately increased in N piglets, whereas it only increased after 8 h in L piglets. L piglets showed a lower GLYHIND at birth and did not use this glycogen during the first 8 h postpartum, while N piglets showed a gradual depletion. GLYLIVER at birth was 50% lower for L piglets and was unused during the studied period while N piglets consumed half of their GLYLIVER during the first 8 h. Based on these results, it is possible that lower glycogen concentrations at birth, the delayed increase in GLU and the lower use of glycogen during the first 8 h after birth negatively affect motor performance in L piglets. However, based on this study, it is unclear whether the low mobilization of glycogen by L piglets is a consequence, rather than a cause of their lower motor performance.

1 October 2019 in The Veterinary Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSara Prims
Sara Prims
CHCharlotte Vanden Hole
Charlotte Vanden Hole
SCS. Van Cruchten
S. Van Cruchten
CGChris Van Ginneken
Chris Van Ginneken
XOX. Van Ostade
X. Van Ostade
CCChristophe R. Casteleyn
Christophe R. Casteleyn

11 November 2016 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HVHans Vergauwen
Hans Vergauwen
SPSara Prims
Sara Prims
JDJeroen Degroote
Jeroen Degroote
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
CCChristophe R. Casteleyn
Christophe R. Casteleyn
CGChris Van Ginneken
Chris Van Ginneken
Oxidative stress in the small intestinal epithelium can lead to barrier malfunction. In this study, the effect of rosmarinic acid (RA), quercetin (Que), gallic acid (GA), lipoic acid (LA), ethoxyquin (ETQ) and Se-methionine (SeMet) pre-treatments using 2 mM Trolox as a control on the viability and the generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (iROS) of oxidatively (H2O2) stressed intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) was investigated. A neutral red assay showed that RA (50–400 µM), Que (12.5–200 µM), GA (50–400 µM), ETQ (6.25–100 µM), and SeMet (125–1000 µM) pre-treatments but not LA significantly increased the viability of H2O2-stressed IPEC-J2 cells (p < 0.05). A 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA) fluorescent probe showed that RA (100–600 µM), Que (25–800 µM), ETQ (3.125–100 µM) and SeMet (500–2000 µM) pre-treatments significantly reduced iROS in IPEC-J2 monolayers (p < 0.05). Moreover, RA and Que were most effective in reducing iROS. Therefore, the effects of RA and Que on barrier functioning in vitro were examined. RA and Que pre-treatments significantly decreased fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated dextran-4 (4 kDa) permeability and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of an IPEC-J2 cell monolayer (p < 0.05). These in vitro results of RA and Que hold promise for their use as antioxidants in pig feed.

8 April 2017 in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HVHans Vergauwen
Hans Vergauwen
JDJeroen Degroote
Jeroen Degroote
SPSara Prims
Sara Prims
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
EEErik Erik
Erik Erik
CGChris Van Ginneken
Chris Van Ginneken
In this study the physiological implications of artificial rearing were investigated. Low (LBW) and normal birth weight (NBW) piglets were compared as they might react differently to stressors caused by artificial rearing. In total, 42 pairs of LBW and NBW piglets from 16 litters suckled the sow until d19 of age or were artificially reared starting at d3 until d19 of age. Blood and tissue samples that were collected after euthanasia at 0, 3, 5, 8 and 19 d of age. Histology, ELISA, and Ussing chamber analysis were used to study proximal and distal small intestine histo-morphology, proliferation, apoptosis, tight junction protein expression, and permeability. Furthermore, small intestine, liver and systemic redox parameters (GSH, GSSG, GSH-Px and MDA) were investigated using HPLC. LBW and NBW artificially reared piglets weighed respectively 40 and 33% more than LBW and NBW sow-reared piglets at d19 (P < 0.01). Transferring piglets to a nursery at d3 resulted in villus atrophy, increased intestinal FD-4 and HRP permeability and elevated GSSG/GSH ratio in the distal small intestine at d5 (P < 0.05). GSH concentrations in the proximal small intestine remained stable, while they decreased in the liver (P < 0.05). From d5 until d19, villus width and crypt depth increased, whereas PCNA, caspase-3, occludin and claudin-3 protein expressions were reduced. GSH, GSSG and permeability recovered in artificially reared piglets (P < 0.05). The results suggest that artificial rearing altered the morphology, permeability and redox state without compromising piglet performance. The observed effects were not depending on birth weight.

5 February 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kevin Van TichelenKevin Van Tichelen
Kevin Van Tichelen
SPSara Prims
Sara Prims
Miriam AyusoMiriam Ayuso
Miriam Ayuso
CKCéline Van Kerschaver
Céline Van Kerschaver
MVMario Vandaele
Mario Vandaele
CGChris Van Ginneken
Chris Van Ginneken
The increase in litter sizes in recent years has resulted in more low birth weight (LBW) piglets, accompanied by a higher mortality. A potential intervention to overcome this is drenching bioactive substances. However, if the act of drenching provokes additional stress in LBW piglets, it might counteract the supplement’s effect and be detrimental for the piglet’s survival. To study the effect of the drenching act, piglets from 67 sows were weighed within 4 h after birth. The mean litter birth weight (MLBW) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. LBW piglets (n = 76) were defined as weighing between (MLBW-1*SD) and (MLBW-2.5*SD). They were randomly allocated to two treatments: “sham” (conducting the act of drenching by inserting an empty 2.5 mL syringe in the mouth during 20 s, once a day, d1 till d7; n = 37) or “no treatment” (no handling; n = 39). On day 1, 3, 9, 24 and 38, piglets were weighed and scored for skin lesions. Blood samples were collected on day 9 and 38 and analyzed to determine glucose, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), urea, immunoglobulin G (IgG), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and a standard blood panel test. There was no difference between sham drenched and untreated piglets regarding any of the parameters. In conclusion, this study showed that drenching does not impose a significant risk to LBW piglets and can be applied safely during the first 7 days after birth.

1 March 2019 in Journal of Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSara Prims
Sara Prims
GRGeert Van Raemdonck
Geert Van Raemdonck
CHCharlotte Vanden Hole
Charlotte Vanden Hole
SCSteven J. Van Cruchten
Steven J. Van Cruchten
CGChris Van Ginneken
Chris Van Ginneken
CCChristophe R. Casteleyn
Christophe R. Casteleyn