ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI

Dr. ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI

Division of Heliophysics, Planetary Science and Aeronomy, National Institute of Space Research (INPE), Sao Jose dos Campos 78055-840, Sao Paulo, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 October 2018 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JOJonah F. Olusegun
Jonah F. Olusegun
ACA. Coster
A. Coster
SZS. Zhang
S. Zhang
LGLarisa P. Goncharenko
Larisa P. Goncharenko
PEPhilip J. Erickson
Philip J. Erickson
EKESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
We investigate ionospheric perturbations associated with traveling ionospheric disturbance (TID) during the geomagnetic storm on Memorial Day weekend (28 May) 2017. Results show the presence of both equatorward propagating large‐scale TIDs (LSTIDs) and poleward propagating medium‐scale TIDs. Equatorward moving TIDs are connected with enhanced auroral activity owing to geomagnetic storm conditions, while poleward TIDs are believed to be induced by local atmospheric gravity wave sources originating from convection activities near the West Coast of North America. Measurements from magnetometers located in the west, central, and east regions of North America are used to evaluate energy inputs from the auroral belt, and these observations confirm that equatorward LSTIDs are due to geomagnetic disturbance. The observed LSTID waves were characterized by some uncommon features, such as horizontal wavefront stretching from coast to coast, aligned in the NW to SE direction, and propagating to the southwest (equatorward) direction during the storm main phase period. In contrast, during the recovery phase and on other experimental control days, the observed medium‐scale TIDs were characterized with relatively smaller wavelengths aligned in the NW to SE direction and propagate primarily in the northeast (poleward) direction. Our results also reveal that LSTID waves appear to travel faster in the central continental region compared to LSTIDs in the western and eastern regions.

30 December 2015 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
LRL. Rolland
L. Rolland
PLP. Lognonné
P. Lognonné
ASA. Sladen
A. Sladen
Virginia KlausnerVirginia Klausner
Virginia Klausner
EPE.R. de Paula
E.R. de Paula
We document two kinds of traveling ionospheric disturbances, namely, CTIDs (Co-tsunami-Traveling-Ionospheric-disturbances) and ATIDs (Ahead-of-Tsunami-Traveling-Ionospheric-disturbances) related to the Tohoku-Oki tsunami of 2011 March 11. They are referred to the disturbances that remain behind and ahead of the principal tsunami wave front, respectively. We first note their presence in a numerical experiment performed using a simulation code coupling the tsunami, atmosphere and ionosphere. This code uses the tsunami wavefield as an input and simulates acoustic-gravity waves (AGWs) in the atmosphere and TIDs, in the form of total electron content (TEC) disturbance, in the ionosphere. The simulated TEC reveals the excitation of CTIDs (at about 2 TECU) and ATIDs (at about 1 TECU), representing up to 5 per cent disturbance over the ambient electron density, and they arise from the dissipation of AGWs in the thermosphere. A novel outcome is that during the tsunami passage between ∼6° and 12° of epicentral distance, strong ATIDs arrive ∼20–60 min ahead of the tsunami wave front covering ∼3°–10° of distance from the tsunami location. Simulation results are compared with the far-field observations using GNSS satellites and confirm that ATIDs are the first detected TEC maximum, occurring 20–60 min ahead of the tsunami arrival. Our simulation also confirms the presence of largest TEC maximum representing CTIDs, 10–20 min after the first tsunami wave. ATIDs reported in this study have characteristics that can be potentially used for the early warning of the tsunami.

8 September 2023 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMBoris Maletckii
Boris Maletckii
Elvira AstafyevaElvira Astafyeva
Elvira Astafyeva
SJSaúl Sánchez Juarez
Saúl Sánchez Juarez
EKESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
EPEurico Rodrigues de Paula
Eurico Rodrigues de Paula
On 6 February 2023, a series of large earthquakes struck Turkey and Northern Syria. The main earthquake of Mw 7.8 occurred at 01:17:34 UTC and was followed by the three notable (Mw > 5.5) aftershocks within the next 18 min. Then, ∼9 hr later, the biggest aftershock with magnitude Mw 7.5 and a Mw 6.0 earthquake occurred to the north‐east from the first main earthquake. In this work, we use data of ground‐based Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers in Turkey, Israel and Cyprus to analyze the ionospheric response to this series of earthquakes. We separate these events in two groups: the first sequence of earthquakes (at 01–02 UTC) and the second sequence (at 10–11 UTC). For the first sequence, we observe a clear N‐shaped total electron content (TEC) response after the Mw 7.8 mainshock earthquake and Mw 6.7 aftershock, and a smaller TEC disturbance that is, most likely, caused by the Mw 5.6 earthquake. The latter is now the smallest earthquake detected by using ionospheric GNSS data. The co‐seismic ionospheric disturbances (CSID) propagated from the epicentral area in the south‐west direction with velocities of about 750–830 m/s. For the second sequence, we observed the response to the Mw 7.5 aftershock earthquake and the Mw 6.0 aftershock. The CSID propagated both to the south‐west and the north‐west to the epicentral area, with velocities of about 950–1,100 m/s.

8 September 2017 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JOJonah F. Olusegun
Jonah F. Olusegun
EKESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
EPE. R. De Paula
E. R. De Paula

1 January 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSaúl Sánchez Juarez
Saúl Sánchez Juarez
EKESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
Elvira AstafyevaElvira Astafyeva
Elvira Astafyeva
EPEurico Rodrigues de Paula
Eurico Rodrigues de Paula
Earthquakes are known to generate disturbances in the ionosphere. Such disturbances, referred to as co-seismic ionospheric disturbances, or ionoquakes, were previously reported for large earthquakes with magnitudes Mw≥ 6.6. This paper reports ionoquakes associated with the Ridgecrest earthquakes of magnitude (Mw=6.4), that occurred on 4 July 2019 in California, USA. The ionoquakes manifested in total electron content (TEC) in the form of traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) within 1 h from the mainshock onset. These seismic-origin TIDs have unique wave characteristics that distinguish them from TIDs of non-seismic origin arising from a moderate geomagnetic activity on the same day. Moreover, in the space-time domain of the detection of seismic-origin TIDs, TIDs are absent on the day before and day after the earthquake day. Their spectral characteristics relate them to the Earth’s normal modes and atmospheric resonance modes. We found the ground velocity associated with the mainshock, rather than the ground displacement, satisfies the threshold criteria for detectable ionoquakes in TEC measurements. Numerical simulation suggested that the coupled seismo–atmosphere–ionosphere (SAI) dynamics energized by the atmospheric waves are responsible for the generation of ionoquakes. This study’s findings demonstrate the potential of using TEC measurement to detect the ionospheric counterparts of moderate earthquakes.

14 September 2023 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSaúl Sánchez Juarez
Saúl Sánchez Juarez
EKESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
ESFHAN ALAM KHERANI
Elvira AstafyevaElvira Astafyeva
Elvira Astafyeva
EPEurico Rodrigues de Paula
Eurico Rodrigues de Paula