Bronchiolitis (BR), a lower respiratory tract infection mainly caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), can be very severe. Presently, adequate nutritional support and oxygen therapy remain the only interventions recommended to treat patients with BR. For years, mild BR cases were treated with noninvasive standard oxygen therapy (SOT), i.e., with cold and poorly or totally non-humidified oxygen delivered by an ambient headbox or low-flow nasal cannula. Children with severe disease were intubated and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). To improve SOT and overcome the disadvantages of IMV, new measures of noninvasive and more efficient oxygen administration have been studied. Bi-level positive air way pressure (BiPAP), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are among them. For its simplicity, good tolerability and safety, and the good results reported in clinical studies, HFNC has become increasingly popular and is now widely used. However, consistent guidelines for initiation and discontinuation of HFNC are lacking. In this narrative review, the role of HFNC to treat infants with BR is discussed. An analysis of the literature showed that, despite its widespread use, the role of HFNC in preventing respiratory failure in children with BR is not precisely defined. It is not established whether it can offer greater benefits compared to SOT and when and in which infants it can replace CPAP or BiPAP. The analysis of the results clearly indicates the need for multicenter studies and official guidelines. In the meantime, HFNC can be considered a safe and effective method to treat children with mild to moderate BR who do not respond to SOT.

In patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria can predispose to exacerbations, limit the effectiveness of antibiotic treatments and promote the progression of lung disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare pulmonary exacerbations (Pex), hospitalizations, lung function and nutritional status in a group of children and adolescents with CF colonized by MDR bacteria and in a noncolonized control group. Overall, 7/54 pediatric patients (12.9%) were colonized by MDR bacteria and enrolled (3 with Achromobacter xyloxidans, 3 with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and 1 with Burkholderia cepacia). The control group included 14 sex- and age-matched CF patients (8/14 colonized by Staphylococcus aureus, 2/14 by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2/14 by both microorganisms and 2/14 germ free). At the time of enrollment and 12 months before the first detection of the MDR microorganism, children colonized by MDR bacteria showed lower body mass index (BMI) and lower FEV₁/FVC compared to the control group. Over the previous year before the first detection, children colonized with MDR had more Pex compared to control group; those colonized by S. maltophilia experienced the highest number of Pex. In the 12 months following the first detection of MDR bacteria, all seven patients colonized by MDR had at least one Pex and patients colonized by S. maltophilia had the highest number (mean ± SD: 6 ± 2.6 vs. 1.7 ± 2.3). Our study suggests that CF pediatric patients infected by MDR bacteria have lower BMI, more obstructive disease and experience more exacerbations than patients without MDR bacteria. These differences are present even before being infected, suggesting that children and adolescents with more severe disease are predisposed to be colonized by MDR bacteria. S. maltophilia appeared to be the most aggressive pathogen. Further studies and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs are necessary to clarify when and how to treat patients with CF and MDR bacteria in order to avoid the improper use of antibiotics and the development of antibiotic resistance.