Three-dimensional bioprinting has emerged as a promising technique in tissue engineering applications through the precise deposition of cells and biomaterials in a layer-by-layer fashion. However, the limited availability of hydrogel bioinks is frequently cited as a major issue for the advancement of cell-based extrusion bioprinting technologies. It is well known that highly viscous materials maintain their structure better, but also have decreased cell viability due to the higher forces which are required for extrusion. However, little is known about the effect of the two distinct components of dynamic modulus of viscoelastic materials, storage modulus ( G ′) and loss modulus ( G ″), on the printability of hydrogel-based bioinks. Additionally, ‘printability’ has been poorly defined in the literature, mostly consisting of gross qualitative measures which do not allow for direct comparison of bioinks. This study developed a framework for evaluating printability and investigated the effect of dynamic modulus, including storage modulus ( G ′), loss modulus ( G ″), and loss tangent ( G ″/ G ′) on the printing outcome. Gelatin and alginate as model hydrogels were mixed at various concentrations to obtain hydrogel formulations with a wide range of storage and loss moduli. These formulations were then evaluated for the quantitatively defined values of extrudability, extrusion uniformity, and structural integrity. For extrudability, increasing either the loss or storage modulus increased the pressure required to extrude the bioink. A mathematical model relating the G ′ and G ″ to the required extrusion pressure was derived based on the data. A lower loss tangent was correlated with increased structural integrity while a higher loss tangent correlated with increased extrusion uniformity. Gelatin–alginate composite hydrogels with a loss tangent in the range of 0.25–0.45 exhibited an excellent compromise between structural integrity and extrusion uniformity. In addition to the characterization of a common bioink, the methodology introduced in this paper could also be used to evaluate the printability of other bioinks in the future.

Extrusion-based bioprinting is one of the leading manufacturing techniques for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Its primary limitation is the lack of materials, known as bioinks, which are suitable for the bioprinting process. The degree to which a bioink is suitable for bioprinting has been described as its ‘printability.’ However, a lack of clarity surrounding the methodologies used to evaluate a bioink’s printability, as well as the usage of the term itself, have hindered the field. This article presents a review of measures used to assess the printability of extrusion-based bioinks in an attempt to assist researchers during the bioink development process. Many different aspects of printability exist and many different measurements have been proposed as a consequence. Researchers often do not evaluate a new bioink’s printability at all, while others simply do so qualitatively. Several quantitative measures have been presented for the extrudability, shape fidelity, and printing accuracy of bioinks. Different measures have been developed even within these aspects, each testing the bioink in a slightly different way. Additionally, other relevant measures which had little or no examples of quantifiable methods are also to be considered. Looking forward, further work is needed to improve upon current assessment methodologies, to move towards a more comprehensive view of printability, and to standardize these printability measurements between researchers. Better assessment techniques will naturally lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms which affect printability and better comparisons between bioinks. This in turn will help improve upon the bioink development process and the bioinks available for use in bioprinting.

The goal of this study was to use 3D bioprinting technology to create a bioengineered dental construct containing human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). To accomplish this, we first developed a novel bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) peptide-tethering bioink formulation and examined its rheological properties, its printability, and the structural stability of the bioprinted construct. Second, we evaluated the survival and differentiation of hDPSCs in the bioprinted dental construct by measuring cell viability, proliferation, and gene expression, as well as histological and immunofluorescent analyses. Our results showed that the peptide conjugation into the gelatin methacrylate-based bioink formulation was successfully performed. We determined that greater than 50% of the peptides remained in the bioprinted construct after three weeks in vitro cell culture. Human DPSC viability was >90% in the bioprinted constructs immediately after the printing process. Alizarin Red staining showed that the BMP peptide construct group exhibited the highest calcification as compared to the growth medium, osteogenic medium, and non-BMP peptide construct groups. In addition, immunofluorescent and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analyses showed robust expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein and osteocalcin in the BMP peptide dental constructs. Together, these results strongly suggested that BMP peptide-tethering bioink could accelerate the differentiation of hDPSCs in 3D bioprinted dental constructs.

Full-thickness skin wounds are a significant clinical burden in the United States. Skin bioprinting is a relatively new technology that is under investigation as a new treatment for full-thickness injuries, and development of hydrogels with strong physical and biological characteristics are required to improve both structural integrity of the printed constructs while allowing for a more normal extracellular matrix milieu. This project aims to evaluate the physical and biological characteristics of fibrinogen hydrogel supplemented with decellularized human skin-derived extracellular matrix (dsECM). The hybrid hydrogel improves the cell viability and structural strength of bioprinted skin constructs. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrates that the hybrid hydrogel is composed of both swelling bundles interlocked in a fibrin network, similar to healthy human skin. This hybrid hydrogel has improved rheological properties and shear thinning properties. Extrusion-based printing of the fibrinogen hydrogel + dsECM demonstrates significant improvement in crosshatch pore size. These findings suggest that incorporating the properties of dsECM and fibrinogen hydrogels will improve in vivo integration of the bioprinted skin constructs and support of healthy skin wound regeneration.

Bioink printability persists as a limiting factor toward many bioprinting applications. Printing parameter selection is largely user-dependent, and the effect of cell density on printability has not been thoroughly investigated. Recently, methods have been developed to give greater insight into printing outcomes. This study aims to further advance those methods and apply them to study the effect of printing parameters (feedrate and flowrate) and cell density on printability. Two printed structures, a crosshatch and five-layer tube, were established as printing standards and utilized to determine the printing outcomes. Acellular bioinks were printed using a testing matrix of feedrates of 37.5, 75, 150, 300, and 600 mm/min and flowrates of 21, 42, 84, 168, and 336 mm³/min. Structures were also printed with cell densities of 5, 10, 20, and 40 × 10⁶ cell/mL at 150 mm/min and 84 mm³/min. Only speed ratios (defined as flowrate divided by feedrate) from 0.07 to 2.24 mm² were suitable for analysis. Increasing speed ratio dramatically increased the height, width, and wall thickness of tubular structures, but did not influence radial accuracy. For crosshatch structures, the area of pores and the frequency of broken filaments were decreased without impacting pore shape (Pr). Within speed ratios, feedrate and flowrate had negligible, inconsistent effects. Cell density did not affect any printing outcomes despite slight rheological changes. Printing outcomes were dominated by the speed ratio, with feedrate, flowrate, and cell density having little impact on printing outcomes when controlling for speed ratio within the ranges tested. The relevance of these results to other bioinks and printing conditions requires continued investigation by the bioprinting community, as well as highlight speed ratio as a key variable to report and suggest that rheology is a more sensitive measure than printing outcomes. Impact statement Cell-based 3D bioprinting strategies have a great promise to bioengineer clinically relevant tissue constructs. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms that affect the printability of cell-laden hydrogel bioinks is mandatory. This study investigated the effects of printing parameters and cell density on the printing outcomes, which could provide a significant impact on further bioink development and bioprinting applications.