NeoB is a radiotracer targeting the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), a G-protein–coupled receptor expressed in various cancers. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biodistribution and efficacy of this new therapeutic agent in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST). Eighty-two SCID mice bearing GIST-882 tumors were employed. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB biodistribution was evaluated up to seven days by organ sampling (200 pmol/0.8 MBq, i.v.). For efficacy evaluation, mice received either saline, 400 pmol or 800 pmol of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB (37MBq, 1/w, 3 w, i.v.). SPECT/CT imaging was performed at 24 h, and tumor volume was determined up to 100 days. Elevated and specific [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB uptake was found in the GIST tumor, as demonstrated by in vivo competition (19.1 ± 3.9 %ID/g vs. 0.3 ± 0.1 %ID/g at 4h). [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB tumor retention (half-life of 40.2 h) resulted in elevated tumor-to-background ratios. Tumor volumes were significantly reduced in both treated groups (p < 0.01), even leading to complete tumor regression at the 400 pmol dose. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB exhibited excellent pharmacokinetics with elevated and prolonged tumor uptake and low uptake in non-target organs such as pancreas. The potential of this new theragnostic agent in different indications, including GIST, is under evaluation in the FIH [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB clinical trial.

Background: To assess whether whole-body (WB) bone SPECT/CT provides additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (PC-BR). Methods: Patients referred for a PC-BR and whom benefited from a WB bone SPECT/CT and FCH PET/CT were retrospectively included. Tests were classified as positive, equivocal, or negative for bone metastases. A best valuable comparator (BVC) strategy including imaging and follow-up data was used to determine the metastatic status in the absence of systematic histological evaluation. Results: Between January 2011 and November 2017, 115 consecutive patients with a PC-BR were evaluated. According to the BVC, 30 patients had bone metastases and 85 patients did not present with bone lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 86.7% [69.3–96.2], 98.8% [93.6–100.0], 96.3% [78.7–99.5], and 95.5% [89.4–98.1] for WB bone SPECT/CT and 93.3% [77.9–99.2], 100.0% [95.8–100.0], 100.0 and 97.7% [91.8–99.4] for FCH PET/CT. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases between WB Bone SPECT/CT (AUC 0.824 [0.74–0.90]) and FCH PET/CT (AUC 0.829 [0.75–0.90], p = 0.41). Conclusion: Despite good performances for the diagnosis of bone metastases in PC-BR, WB bone SPECT/CT does not provide additive diagnostic information over concomitant FCH PET/CT.

Recent progress in breast cancer research has led to the identification of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) as a key actor of metastatic colonization. VCAM-1 promotes lung-metastases and is associated with clinical early recurrence and poor outcome in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our objective was to perform the in vivo imaging of VCAM-1 in mice models of TNBC. The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) database was analyzed to evaluate the prognostic role of VCAM-1 in TNBC. MDA-MB-231 (VCAM-1+) and control HCC70 (VCAM-1-) TNBC cells were subcutaneously xenografted in mice and VCAM-1 expression was assessed in vivo by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging using ^99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5. Then, MDA-MB-231 cells were intravenously injected in mice and VCAM-1 expression in lung metastasis was assessed by SPECT imaging after 8 weeks. TCGA analysis showed that VCAM-1 is associated with a poor prognosis in TNBC patients. In subcutaneous tumor models, ^99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 uptake was 2-fold higher in MDA-MB-231 than in HCC70 (p < 0.01), and 4-fold higher than that of the irrelevant control (p < 0.01). Moreover, ^99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 uptake in MDA-MB-231 lung metastases was also higher than that of ^99mTc-Ctl (p < 0.05). ^99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 is therefore a suitable tool to evaluate the role of VCAM-1 as a marker of tumor aggressiveness of TNBC.

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is a highly relevant target in nuclear medicine due to its overexpression in prostate cancer. The ⁶⁸Ga/¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-1 combination is a theranostic agent for the detection and treatment of tumors overexpressing the PSMA target. Specifically, ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-1 is used in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer that is ineffective or intolerant to the latest generation of chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. This radiopharmaceutical is manufactured in a radiopharmaceutical synthesizing unit and must pass a quality control where the radiochemical purity (RCP) is assessed prior to release of the batch. RCP evaluation is performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Since there is no monograph for ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-1 in the European Pharmacopoeia, we validate the analytical methods according to the EANM recommendations adapted from ICH Q2. Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, intermediate precision, limit of quantification (LOQ) and robustness were described for HPLC and TLC in this study. The results obtained demonstrated the robustness and reliability of the HPLC and TLC analytical methods for the evaluation of the RCP of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-1.

Automated compounding device (ACD) are increasingly used for parenteral nutrition (PN) bag production, and their acquisition must be sufficiently thought. The law requires the qualification of these ACD, but did not specify the tests to be performed. The quality by design (QbD) risk based approach allowed to define the quality target product profile in order to acquire the best ACD for each unit, and thanks a risk analysis permitted to define the critical quality attributes (CQA). These CQA will allowed to define tests performed during qualification. The ACD qualified was a 12 pump volumetric system. The CQA for PN bags consisted in sterile, precisely and accurately production with enough stability. During operational qualification volumetric accuracy test was performed, and during the performance qualification: flush volume, media fill, microbiological integrity of environment, sterility of control bag and production test were performed. At the end, all tests were conclusive (excepted for some results mostly due to analytical bias) and the ACD was considered to produce sterile bags in a control envi-ronment, precisely (relative standard deviation < 4%) and accurately (mean bias < 1% for weight and < 7% for other controls) with a sufficient stability. The QbD risk based approach allowed to acquire the best ACD for our need, and qualify relevant elements regarding the production process.

Background: The aim of this brief communication is to highlight the potential bacteriological risk linked to the processes control of radiopharmaceutical preparations made in a radiopharmacy laboratory. Survival rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC: 27853) or Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC: 25923) or Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC: 1228) in multidose technetium-99 m solution was studied. Results: Depending on the nature and level of contamination by pathogenic bacteria, the lethal effect of radioactivity is not systematically observed. We found that P. aeruginosa was indeed affected by radioactivity. However, this was not the case for S. epidermidis, as the quantity of bacteria found in both solutions (radioactive and non-radioactive) was rapidly reduced, probably due to a lack of nutrients. Finally, the example of S. aureus is an intermediate case where we observed that high radioactivity affected the bacteria, as did the absence of nutrients in the reaction medium. The results were discussed in the light of current practices on the sterility test method, which recommends waiting for radioactivity to decay before carrying out the sterility test. Conclusion: In terms of patient safety, the results run counter to current practice and the latest EANM recommendation of 2021 that radiopharmaceutical preparations should be decayed before sterility testing.