Multiaccess infusion sets allow multiple simultaneous infusions but may induce interference in drug delivery resulting from large variations in the delivery rate of potent drugs. In this study, we sought to understand the influence of multiaccess infusion device properties (dead space volume and antireflux valve [ARV]) on drug delivery during multi-infusion therapy. Infusion sets differing in length, dead space volume, and presence of an ARV were assessed. Three drugs were infused simultaneously through different access points, and their concentrations were obtained using UV spectrophotometric analysis of the effluent. Different infusion configurations were compared by assessing (1) the amount of drug delivered to the patient per unit of time, (2) the mean amount of drug delivered to the patient per unit of time during the steady-state infusion (mass flow rate plateau), and (3) flow change efficiency calculated from the ratio of the area under the experimental instant mass flow rate curve to the area corresponding to theoretical instant mass flow rate curve. Infusion sets with lower dead space volumes offered significantly higher flow change efficiency (53.0% +/- 15.4% with a dead space volume equal to 0.046 mL 5 min after the start of infusion) than infusion sets with higher dead space volume (5.6% +/- 8.2% with a dead space volume equal to 6.16 mL), whatever the flow rate changes. Even in case of large dead space volumes, the presence of an ARV significantly increased the mass flow rate plateau (from 92.4% to 99.3% of the theoretical plateau without and with the presence of an ARV, respectively). Multi-infusion therapy induces perturbation in drug delivery. These perturbations (lag time, backflow, and bolus) could be reduced by using infusion sets including very low dead space volume and an ARV.

The objective of this randomized, prospective and controlled study was to investigate the ability of a closed-system transfer device (CSTD; BD-Phaseal) to reduce the occupational exposure of two isolators to 10 cytotoxic drugs and compare to standard compounding devices. The 6-month study started with the opening of a new compounding unit. Two isolators were set up with 2 workstations each, one to compound with standard devices (needles and spikes) and the other using the Phaseal system. Drugs were alternatively compounded in each isolator. Sampling involved wiping three surfaces (gloves, window, worktop), before and after a cleaning process. Exposure to ten antineoplastic drugs (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, dacarbazine, 5-FU, methotrexate, gemcitabine, cytarabine, irinotecan, doxorubicine and ganciclovir) was assessed on wipes by LC-MS/MS analysis. Contamination rates were compared using a Chi² test and drug amounts by a Mann-Whitney test. Significance was defined for p<0.05. Overall contamination was lower in the “Phaseal” isolator than in the “Standard” isolator (12.24% vs. 26.39%; p < 0.0001) although it differed according to drug. Indeed, the contamination rates of gemcitabine were 49.3 and 43.4% (NS) for the Standard and Phaseal isolators, respectively, whereas for ganciclovir, they were 54.2 and 2.8% (p<0.0001). Gemcitabine amounts were 220.6 and 283.6 ng for the Standard and Phaseal isolators (NS), and ganciclovir amounts were 179.9 and 2.4 ng (p<0.0001). This study confirms that using a CSTD may significantly decrease the chemical contamination of barrier isolators compared to standard devices for some drugs, although it does not eliminate contamination totally.

The ability of an infusion set to deliver a specific amount of drug to the patient can be directly related to the presence of an antireflux valve and dead-space volume. In this study we quantified separately the impact of these 2 components on drug delivery. Various infusion sets were assessed differing in length, in dead-space volume, and with or without an antireflux valve. Noradrenaline was infused with a syringe pump simultaneously with a carrier flow. Effluent drug concentration was measured using ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Flow change efficiency (FCE) was calculated from the ratio of the area under the experimental mass flow rate curve to the area under the theoretical instantaneous mass flow rate curve. The FCE for infusion sets with or without antireflux valves were significantly different 10 to 15 minutes after the start of an infusion at flow rates of 7 mL/h for noradrenaline and 35 mL/h to 70 mL/h for the carrier fluid. They were not different with a carrier flow of 115 mL/h. These findings suggest that antireflux valves have a significant impact on FCE when the ratio of drug flow rate to carrier fluid flow rate is high. Infusion sets with very low dead-space volume connectors yield better FCE. There is a nonlinear relationship between dead-space volume and FCE 5 to 10 minutes after the onset of drug infusion. Care providers must consider dead-space volume and the presence of an antireflux valve when choosing their infusion sets.

Stopping and resuming carrier fluid flow can lead to potentially dangerous transient disturbances in drug mass flow rate. We compared the impact of 2 infusion sets, one with very low dead-space volume and the other with greater dead-space volume, on the amount of drug delivered during stop-and-go carrier fluid flows. Two infusion sets, both with antireflux, connected to an angiocatheter and with dead-space volumes of 6.185 mL and 0.071 mL, respectively, were assessed. Two protocols were studied: carrier fluid flow of 90 mL/h associated with noradrenaline infused at 7 mL/h and carrier fluid flow of 350 mL/h with a noradrenaline infusion flow of 65 mL/h. During both protocols, the carrier fluid was stopped and resumed at the same rate 30 minutes later. Effluent noradrenaline concentration was measured using UV spectrophotometry. Flow change efficiency was calculated from the ratio of the area under the experimental mass flow rate curve to the area under the theoretical instantaneous mass flow rate curve. For both flow rate conditions, flow change efficiency was significantly different for the 2 infusion sets during the 10-minute period after stopping carrier fluid flow and the 10-minute period after restarting it. The major phenomena were sudden decreases in drug delivery after stopping carrier flow and sudden, temporary increases when it was resumed. The very low dead-space volume infusion set resulted in significant reduction in changes in drug delivery compared with the standard set, even at high flow rates. The use of a very low dead-space volume set attenuates disturbances in drug delivery caused by interrupting and resuming carrier fluid flow.