Michele Cavo

Prof. Michele Cavo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

47Years (1980-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRS Vincent Rajkumar
S Vincent Rajkumar
Meletios-Athanasios DimopoulosMeletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
APAntonio Palumbo
Antonio Palumbo
JBJoan Blade
Joan Blade
GMGiampaolo Merlini
Giampaolo Merlini
JMJesus F San Miguel
Jesus F San Miguel

1 August 2016 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShaji Kumar
Shaji Kumar
Bruno David Lourenco PaivaBruno David Lourenco Paiva
Bruno David Lourenco Paiva
KAKenneth C Anderson
Kenneth C Anderson
BDBrian Durie
Brian Durie
OLOla Landgren
Ola Landgren
HAHerve Avet-Loiseau
Herve Avet-Loiseau

10 September 2015 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAntonio Palumbo
Antonio Palumbo
HAHervé Avet-Loiseau
Hervé Avet-Loiseau
SOStefania Oliva
Stefania Oliva
HLHenk M. Lokhorst
Henk M. Lokhorst
HGHartmut Goldschmidt
Hartmut Goldschmidt
PMPhilippe Moreau
Philippe Moreau
Purpose: The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify patients with MM. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization after CD138 plasma cell purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).Patients and Methods: Clinical and laboratory data from 4,445 patients with NDMM enrolled onto 11 international trials were pooled together. The K-adaptive partitioning algorithm was used to define the most appropriate subgroups with homogeneous survival.Results: ISS, CA, and LDH data were simultaneously available in 3,060 of 4,445 patients. We defined the following three groups: revised ISS (R-ISS) I (n = 871), including ISS stage I (serum β2-microglobulin level < 3.5 mg/L and serum albumin level ≥ 3.5 g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)], and normal LDH level (less than the upper limit of normal range); R-ISS III (n = 295), including ISS stage III (serum β2-microglobulin level > 5.5 mg/L) and high-risk CA or high LDH level; and R-ISS II (n = 1,894), including all the other possible combinations. At a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year OS rate was 82% in the R-ISS I, 62% in the R-ISS II, and 40% in the R-ISS III groups; the 5-year PFS rates were 55%, 36%, and 24%, respectively.Conclusion: The R-ISS is a simple and powerful prognostic staging system, and we recommend its use in future clinical studies to stratify patients with NDMM effectively with respect to the relative risk to their survival.

28 April 2016 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPhilippe Moreau
Philippe Moreau
TMTamás Masszi
Tamás Masszi
NGNorbert Grząśko
Norbert Grząśko
NBNizar J. Bahlis
Nizar J. Bahlis
MHMarkus Hansson
Markus Hansson
PRPaul G. Richardson
Paul G. Richardson
Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor that is currently being studied for the treatment of multiple myeloma. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide–dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide–dexamethasone (placebo group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ixazomib group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 14.7 months (median progression-free survival, 20.6 months vs. 14.7 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the ixazomib group, 0.74; P=0.01); a benefit with respect to progression-free survival was observed with the ixazomib regimen, as compared with the placebo regimen, in all prespecified patient subgroups, including in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The overall rates of response were 78% in the ixazomib group and 72% in the placebo group, and the corresponding rates of complete response plus very good partial response were 48% and 39%. The median time to response was 1.1 months in the ixazomib group and 1.9 months in the placebo group, and the corresponding median duration of response was 20.5 months and 15.0 months. At a median follow-up of approximately 23 months, the median overall survival has not been reached in either study group, and follow-up is ongoing. The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups (47% in the ixazomib group and 49% in the placebo group), as were the rates of death during the study period (4% and 6%, respectively); adverse events of at least grade 3 severity occurred in 74% and 69% of the patients, respectively. Thrombocytopenia of grade 3 and grade 4 severity occurred more frequently in the ixazomib group (12% and 7% of the patients, respectively) than in the placebo group (5% and 4% of the patients, respectively). Rash occurred more frequently in the ixazomib group than in the placebo group (36% vs. 23% of the patients), as did gastrointestinal adverse events, which were predominantly low grade. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 27% in the ixazomib group and 22% in the placebo group (grade 3 events occurred in 2% of the patients in each study group). Patient-reported quality of life was similar in the two study groups. The addition of ixazomib to a regimen of lenalidomide and dexamethasone was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival; the additional toxic effects with this all-oral regimen were limited. (Funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals; TOURMALINE-MM1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01564537.)

8 February 2018 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMaría-Victoria Mateos
María-Victoria Mateos
MDMeletios A. Dimopoulos
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
MCMichele Cavo
Michele Cavo
KSKenshi Suzuki
Kenshi Suzuki
AJAndrzej Jakubowiak
Andrzej Jakubowiak
JSJesus San-Miguel
Jesus San-Miguel
The combination of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone is a standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Daratumumab has shown efficacy in combination with standard-of-care regimens in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 706 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation to receive nine cycles of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone either alone (control group) or with daratumumab (daratumumab group) until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival. At a median follow-up of 16.5 months in a prespecified interim analysis, the 18-month progression-free survival rate was 71.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 76.8) in the daratumumab group and 50.2% (95% CI, 43.2 to 56.7) in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The overall response rate was 90.9% in the daratumumab group, as compared with 73.9% in the control group (P<0.001), and the rate of complete response or better (including stringent complete response) was 42.6%, versus 24.4% (P<0.001). In the daratumumab group, 22.3% of the patients were negative for minimal residual disease (at a threshold of 1 tumor cell per 105 white cells), as compared with 6.2% of those in the control group (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were hematologic: neutropenia (in 39.9% of the patients in the daratumumab group and in 38.7% of those in the control group), thrombocytopenia (in 34.4% and 37.6%, respectively), and anemia (in 15.9% and 19.8%, respectively). The rate of grade 3 or 4 infections was 23.1% in the daratumumab group and 14.7% in the control group; the rate of treatment discontinuation due to infections was 0.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Daratumumab-associated infusion-related reactions occurred in 27.7% of the patients. Among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation, daratumumab combined with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone resulted in a lower risk of disease progression or death than the same regimen without daratumumab. The daratumumab-containing regimen was associated with more grade 3 or 4 infections. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ALCYONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02195479.)

1 October 2013 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJesus San Miguel
Jesus San Miguel
KWKatja Weisel
Katja Weisel
PMPhilippe Moreau
Philippe Moreau
MLMartha Lacy
Martha Lacy
KSKevin Song
Kevin Song
Meletios-Athanasios DimopoulosMeletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos