Florian Dr. Heitz

Dr. Florian Dr. Heitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 March 2013 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStig E Bojesen
Stig E Bojesen
KPKaren A Pooley
Karen A Pooley
SJSharon E Johnatty
Sharon E Johnatty
JBJonathan Beesley
Jonathan Beesley
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
ADAlison M Dunning
Alison M Dunning
Stig Bojesen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Alison Dunning and colleagues report common variants at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus associated with mean telomere length measured in whole blood. They also identify associations at this locus to breast or ovarian cancer susceptibility and report functional studies in breast and ovarian cancer tissue and cell lines. TERT-locus SNPs and leukocyte telomere measures are reportedly associated with risks of multiple cancers. Using the Illumina custom genotyping array iCOGs, we analyzed ∼480 SNPs at the TERT locus in breast (n = 103,991), ovarian (n = 39,774) and BRCA1 mutation carrier (n = 11,705) cancer cases and controls. Leukocyte telomere measurements were also available for 53,724 participants. Most associations cluster into three independent peaks. The minor allele at the peak 1 SNP rs2736108 associates with longer telomeres (P = 5.8 × 10−7), lower risks for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (P = 1.0 × 10−8) and BRCA1 mutation carrier (P = 1.1 × 10−5) breast cancers and altered promoter assay signal. The minor allele at the peak 2 SNP rs7705526 associates with longer telomeres (P = 2.3 × 10−14), higher risk of low-malignant-potential ovarian cancer (P = 1.3 × 10−15) and greater promoter activity. The minor alleles at the peak 3 SNPs rs10069690 and rs2242652 increase ER-negative (P = 1.2 × 10−12) and BRCA1 mutation carrier (P = 1.6 × 10−14) breast and invasive ovarian (P = 1.3 × 10−11) cancer risks but not via altered telomere length. The cancer risk alleles of rs2242652 and rs10069690, respectively, increase silencing and generate a truncated TERT splice variant.

27 March 2013 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAustralian Cancer Study
Australian Cancer Study
PPPaul D P Pharoah
Paul D P Pharoah
AGAustralian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
YTYa-Yu Tsai
Ya-Yu Tsai
SRSusan Ramus
Susan Ramus
TSThomas A Sellers
Thomas A Sellers
Paul Pharoah, Joellen Schildkraut, Thomas Sellers and colleagues report a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for epithelial ovarian cancer and genotyping using the iCOGS array in 18,174 cases and 26,134 controls from 43 studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. They identify three new ovarian cancer susceptibility loci, including one specific to the serous subtype, and their integrated molecular analysis of genes and regulatory regions at these loci suggests disease mechanisms. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified four susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), with another two suggestive loci reaching near genome-wide significance. We pooled data from a GWAS conducted in North America with another GWAS from the UK. We selected the top 24,551 SNPs for inclusion on the iCOGS custom genotyping array. We performed follow-up genotyping in 18,174 individuals with EOC (cases) and 26,134 controls from 43 studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. We validated the two loci at 3q25 and 17q21 that were previously found to have associations close to genome-wide significance and identified three loci newly associated with risk: two loci associated with all EOC subtypes at 8q21 (rs11782652, P = 5.5 × 10−9) and 10p12 (rs1243180, P = 1.8 × 10−8) and another locus specific to the serous subtype at 17q12 (rs757210, P = 8.1 × 10−10). An integrated molecular analysis of genes and regulatory regions at these loci provided evidence for functional mechanisms underlying susceptibility and implicated CHMP4C in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.

1 November 2017 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSandro Pignata
Sandro Pignata
SCS. C Cecere
S. C Cecere
ABA. Du Bois
A. Du Bois
PHP. Harter
P. Harter
FHFlorian Dr. Heitz
Florian Dr. Heitz
Despite optimal surgery and appropriate first-line chemotherapy, ∼70%–80% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer will develop disease relapse. The same modalities as used primarily are available for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). The rationale for repetitive surgery in ROC was based on a stable body of retrospective data; however, prospective data were missing. Now, preliminary data from the prospective AGO-DESKTOP III give evidence that surgery for ROC seems to be of benefit for selected patients with platinum-sensitive relapse undergoing complete resection. With respect to systemic therapy, tumor histology, BRCA status, the platinum-free interval (PFI) and previous treatment with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) are considered the most important features that influence treatment choice in ROC. In patients with resistant or refractory relapse (PFI < 6 months), monotherapy with a non-platinum drug or participation in clinical trials is indicated. The association of non-platinum monotherapy with bevacizumab, followed by maintenance has been approved in this setting in some European countries due to PFS benefit. In patients with partially sensitive relapse (PFI between 6 and 12 months), two options are available: platinum doublets or non-platinum therapy (single agent or combination). The pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/trabectedin combination represents a viable alternative in patients that cannot receive platinum. In platinum-sensitive patients, treatment with platinum-based combinations is associated with PFS advantage compared with single agents or non-platinum combinations. The presence of germline or somatic BRCA mutations allows platinum-responsive patients to optimize chemotherapy efficacy and prolonging PFS by the use of olaparib (PARP inhibitor) given as maintenance therapy until progression. In patients not pretreated with bevacizumab in first line, the carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab combination, followed by maintenance is a viable alternative in platinum-sensitive patients (PFI> 6 months). The integration of surgery, with a ‘personalized’ approach by the use of antiangiogenic agent and of PARP inhibitors is affecting survival of patients with recurrent disease and will help epithelial ovarian cancer to become a chronic disease.

12 January 2015 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKaroline B Kuchenbaecker
Karoline B Kuchenbaecker
SRSusan Ramus
Susan Ramus
JTJonathan Tyrer
Jonathan Tyrer
ALAndrew Lee
Andrew Lee
HSHoward C Shen
Howard C Shen
HEHebon
Hebon
Georgia Chenevix-Trench and colleagues report meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identifying six loci newly associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). They also test variants at the 12 known and 6 new EOC susceptibility loci for association in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 12 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility alleles. The pattern of association at these loci is consistent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who are at high risk of EOC. After imputation to 1000 Genomes Project data, we assessed associations of 11 million genetic variants with EOC risk from 15,437 cases unselected for family history and 30,845 controls and from 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers (3,096 with ovarian cancer), and we combined the results in a meta-analysis. This new study design yielded increased statistical power, leading to the discovery of six new EOC susceptibility loci. Variants at 1p36 (nearest gene, WNT4), 4q26 (SYNPO2), 9q34.2 (ABO) and 17q11.2 (ATAD5) were associated with EOC risk, and at 1p34.3 (RSPO1) and 6p22.1 (GPX6) variants were specifically associated with the serous EOC subtype, all with P < 5 × 10−8. Incorporating these variants into risk assessment tools will improve clinical risk predictions for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

1 March 2016 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJacek P. Grabowski
Jacek P. Grabowski
PHPhilipp Harter
Philipp Harter
FHFlorian Dr. Heitz
Florian Dr. Heitz
EPEric Pujade-Lauraine
Eric Pujade-Lauraine
ARAlexander Reuss
Alexander Reuss
ABAndreas du Bois
Andreas du Bois

31 August 2016 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSiddhartha P. Kar
Siddhartha P. Kar
JBJonathan Beesley
Jonathan Beesley
AOAli Amin Al Olama
Ali Amin Al Olama
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
JTJonathan Tyrer
Jonathan Tyrer
DLDiether Lambrechts
Diether Lambrechts
Breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P < 10−8 seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type–specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer–gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P < 10−5 in the three-cancer meta-analysis. Significance: We demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052–67. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932