Francesco Zarantonello

Dr. Francesco Zarantonello

Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedale - Università di Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 October 2021 in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nicolò SellaNicolò Sella
Nicolò Sella
TPTommaso Pettenuzzo
Tommaso Pettenuzzo
FZFrancesco Zarantonello
Francesco Zarantonello
GAGiulio Andreatta
Giulio Andreatta
ACAlessandro De Cassai
Alessandro De Cassai
PNPaolo Navalesi
Paolo Navalesi

1 June 2017 in Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michele CarronMichele Carron
Michele Carron
FZFrancesco Zarantonello
Francesco Zarantonello
NLNadia Lazzarotto
Nadia Lazzarotto
PTPaola Tellaroli
Paola Tellaroli
COCarlo Ori
Carlo Ori

1 July 2020 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FZFrancesco Zarantonello
Francesco Zarantonello
GAGiulio Andreatta
Giulio Andreatta
Nicolò SellaNicolò Sella
Nicolò Sella
PNPaolo Navalesi
Paolo Navalesi

1 March 2016 in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michele CarronMichele Carron
Michele Carron
FZFrancesco Zarantonello
Francesco Zarantonello
PTPaola Tellaroli
Paola Tellaroli
COCarlo Ori
Carlo Ori

1 February 2016 in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michele CarronMichele Carron
Michele Carron
FBFabio Baratto
Fabio Baratto
FZFrancesco Zarantonello
Francesco Zarantonello
COCarlo Ori
Carlo Ori
Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of introducing a rocuronium–neostigmine–sugammadex strategy into a cisatracurium–neostigmine regimen for neuromuscular block (NMB) management. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in five operating rooms at University Hospital of Padova. A clinical outcome evaluation after sugammadex administration as first-choice reversal drug in selected patients (rocuronium–sugammadex) and as rescue therapy after neostigmine reversal (rocuronium–neostigmine–sugammadex) compared to control was performed. A cost-analysis of NMB management accompanying the introduction of a rocuronium–neostigmine–sugammadex strategy into a cisatracurium–neostigmine regimen was carried out. To such purpose, two periods were compared: 2011–2012, without sugammadex available; 2013–2014, with sugammadex available. A subsequent analysis was performed to evaluate if sugammadex replacing neostigmine as first choice reversal drug is cost-effective. Results: The introduction of a rocuronium–neostigmine–sugammadex strategy into a cisatracurium–neostigmine regimen reduced the average cost of NMB management by 36%, from €20.8/case to €13.3/case. Patients receiving sugammadex as a first-choice reversal drug (3%) exhibited significantly better train-of-four ratios at extubation (P<0.001) and were discharged to the surgical ward (P<0.001) more rapidly than controls. The cost-saving of sugammadex as first-choice reversal drug has been estimated to be €2.9/case. Patients receiving sugammadex as rescue therapy after neostigmine reversal (3.2%) showed no difference in time to discharge to the surgical ward (P=0.44) compared to controls. No unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions with rocuronium–neostigmine–sugammadex strategy were observed. The potential economic benefit in avoiding postoperative residual curarization (PORC)-related ICU admission in the 2013–2014 period was estimated at an average value of €13,548 (€9,316–€23,845). Conclusion: Sugammadex eliminated PORC and associated morbidities. In our center, sugammadex reduced the costs of NMB management and promoted rapid turnover of patients in operating rooms, with total cost-effectiveness that counteracts the disadvantages of its high cost.