Iberoam J Med, vol.4, n2, p.92-99, 2022

Background: It has been described that Trypanosoma cruzi is capable of promoting metabolic disturbances currently considered as cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, it has been observed that the protozoa can remain in adipose tissue and alter its immune endocrine functions. The aim of this study was to characterize the thickness of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in patients with chronic Chagas disease (CCD) concerning their cardiovascular metabolic risk profile compared with those without CCD. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including T. cruzi seropositive individuals categorized according to a standard CCD classification and a matched seronegative control group. Complete clinical examination, metabolic laboratory tests and transthoracic echocardiography to assess cardiac function and to quantify EAT were performed. Results: Fifty-five individuals aged 46.7±11.9 y, 34 with CCD and 21 in the control group, were included. The CCD group presented higher EAT thickness in relation to controls (4.54±1.28 vs 3.22±0.99 mm; p=0.001), which was significantly associated with the presence of insulin resistance (OR=3, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.73; p<0.001). This group presented lower levels of plasmatic adiponectin than controls, especially in those patients with EAT ≥4.5 mm (p=0.005) who also presented with heart failure more frequently (p=0.01). Conclusion: In patients with CCD, a higher EAT thickness is observed and is associated with an increased metabolic risk profile indicated mainly by insulin resistance.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CA) and CA plus aztreonam (ATM) are the preferred treatment options for KPC and MBL carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales infections (CPEis). All episodes of monomicrobial CPEis in immunosuppressed patients (IPs) admitted from May 2019 to November 2024, who received definitive antibiotic therapy (AT) with CA or CA + ATM for at least 72 h, were prospectively included. Bacteremic episodes (BEs) and non-bacteremic episodes (NBEs) were compared. Logistic regressions adjusted by propensity score were used to identify variables associated with 30-day overall mortality. In total, 82 CPEis were included (38 NBEs and 44 BEs). BEs more frequently occurred in hematological malignancies (52.3% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.0006), while NBEs were more commonly observed in solid organ transplantation (73.7% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.001). K. pneumoniae was the main isolated microorganism; KPC-CPE was the most common resistance mechanism in both groups, followed by MBL-CPE. The 7-day clinical response, 30-day overall and infection-related mortality between NBEs and BEs were 92.1% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.59, 10.5% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.09, and 2.6% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.11. Septic shock, OR 6.5, 95% CI, 1.58–26.72 (p = 0.01), and refractory malignancy, OR 5.6, 95% CI, 1.03–30.14 (p = 0.046), were associated with 30-day mortality, whereas BEs were not, OR 1.5, 95% CI, 0.36–6.2 (p = 0.56). CPEis in both NBE and BE IPs who received definitive AT with CA or CA + ATM correlated with a high rate of 7-day clinical response and low 30-day infection-related mortality. Underlying malignancy and disease severity were associated with 30-day overall mortality. Regional knowledge of bacterial antibiotic resistance enables the implementation of individualized AT to improve patient survival.

There are no data available on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole (ISA) for treating breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs). A retrospective and prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2020 and March 2025 in 13 centers in Argentina. Hematologic diseases (HD) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients who received ISA for IFI were included and followed for 12 weeks. Patients with proven and probable bIFIs and non-bIFIs were compared. One hundred and sixty-three patients were included. IFIs were classified as proven (13.5%), probable (26.9%) and possible (59.5%). Among 66 proven and probable IFIs, 53% were bIFIs, with aspergillosis and mucormycosis being the most common. Twenty-three (34.8%) patients had acute myelogenous leukemia, and 40.9% had received HCT. Forty-eight (72.7%) patients experienced neutropenia, with a median duration of 26 days (interquartile range [IQR] 16–44). Fluconazole and posaconazole were the most frequently received antifungal prophylaxis. ISA was prescribed as first-line therapy in 31 (46.9%) patients. The other 35 received ISA as a continuation therapy, mainly as a step-down therapy after liposomal amphotericin B. Four (6.1%) patients developed adverse effects, and one discontinued ISA. The 90-day overall clinical response between patients with bIFI vs. non-bIFI was 91.4% vs. 70.9% (p = 0.052). The 90-day overall and IFI-related mortality rates were, respectively, 11.4% vs. 32.3% (p = 0.068) and 5.7% vs. 9.7% (p = 0.659). The study data evidence ISA effectiveness and safety for the treatment of HD and HCT patients with and without bIFIs.

Iberoam J Med, vol.3, n4, p.316-325, 2021

Introduction COVID-19 outbreaks have left us to deal with an aftermath on many fronts. In particular, disproportionate use of antibiotics, high ICU burden and longer in-hospital stays during the pandemic have been proposed to aggravate the emergency posed by carbapenem-resistant isolates (CRI), specially through carbapenemase production. However, there have been few reports worldwide regarding changes in CRI incidence and little latinamerican literature. Objective We set out to determine whether the incidence of CRI rose in a tertiary care center in Santa Fe, Argentina during the time period with active cases of COVID-19. Methods Analytic epidemiologic study retrospectively designed. Two time periods were defined: P1 (without active cases of COVID-19) from September, 2019 to August, 2020 and P2 (starting at the onset of the first wave of COVID-19 in this institution) from September, 2020 to June 2021. All clinically-relevant microbiological samples -those meant for diagnostic purposes-taken during the study period from patients in the Internal Medicine and Surgical wards as well as the Intensive Care Units were included. Incidence was calculated by dividing the number of CRI during each time frame by the count of patient-day during that same period, multiplied by a hundred. Results 9,135 hospitalizations, 50,145 patient-days of analysis. A total of 7285 clinical samples were taken, with an overall positivity for CRI of 12.1% (n=883). Overall CRI incidence during P2 was 2.5 times higher than in P1 (2.52 vs 0.955/100 patient-days, p <0.001). ICU CRI incidence raised from 6.78 to 8.69/100 patient-days in P2 (p=0.006). Conclusion We found alarming rates of CRI in our center, 2.5 times higher than previous to the first COVID-19 wave, similar to other reports worldwide. To our knowledge, this is one of the few Latin-American reports on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRI incidence.