Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

Prof. Dr. Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

Ludwig Maximillian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2005 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FWFrank Witte
Frank Witte
VKV. Kaese
V. Kaese
HHH. Haferkamp
H. Haferkamp
ESE. Switzer
E. Switzer
AMAndrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
HWH. Windhagen
H. Windhagen

1 May 2010 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJC. Janning
C. Janning
EWE. Willbold
E. Willbold
CVC. Vogt
C. Vogt
JNJ. Nellesen
J. Nellesen
AMAndrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
FWFrank Witte
Frank Witte

1 March 2011 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NENina Erdmann
Nina Erdmann
NANina Angrisani
Nina Angrisani
JRJanin Reifenrath
Janin Reifenrath
ALArne Lucas
Arne Lucas
FTFritz Thorey
Fritz Thorey
AMAndrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

1 November 2013 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDina Dziuba
Dina Dziuba
AMAndrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
JSJan Marten Seitz
Jan Marten Seitz
HWHazibullah Waizy
Hazibullah Waizy
NANina Angrisani
Nina Angrisani
JRJanin Reifenrath
Janin Reifenrath

13 January 2010 in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMartina Thomann
Martina Thomann
CKChristian Krause
Christian Krause
NANina Angrisani
Nina Angrisani
DBDirk Bormann
Dirk Bormann
THThomas Hassel
Thomas Hassel
AMAndrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

1 January 2010 in BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NENina Erdmann
Nina Erdmann
ABAlexandr Bondarenko
Alexandr Bondarenko
MHMarion Hewicker-Trautwein
Marion Hewicker-Trautwein
NANina Angrisani
Nina Angrisani
JRJanin Reifenrath
Janin Reifenrath
AMAndrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Recent studies have shown the potential suitability of magnesium alloys as biodegradable implants. The aim of the present study was to compare the soft tissue biocompatibility of MgCa0.8 and commonly used surgical steel in vivo. A biodegradable magnesium calcium alloy (MgCa0.8) and surgical steel (S316L), as a control, were investigated. Screws of identical geometrical conformation were implanted into the tibiae of 40 rabbits for a postoperative follow up of two, four, six and eight weeks. The tibialis cranialis muscle was in direct vicinity of the screw head and thus embedded in paraffin and histologically and immunohistochemically assessed. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was performed to identify macrophages, giant cells and heterophil granulocytes as well as the extent of tissue fibrosis and necrosis. Mouse anti-CD79α and rat anti-CD3 monoclonal primary antibodies were used for B- and T-lymphocyte detection. Evaluation of all sections was performed by applying a semi-quantitative score. Clinically, both implant materials were tolerated well. Histology revealed that a layer of fibrous tissue had formed between implant and overlying muscle in MgCa0.8 and S316L, which was demarcated by a layer of synoviocyte-like cells at its interface to the implant. In MgCa0.8 implants cavities were detected within the fibrous tissue, which were surrounded by the same kind of cell type. The thickness of the fibrous layer and the amount of tissue necrosis and cellular infiltrations gradually decreased in S316L. In contrast, a decrease could only be noted in the first weeks of implantation in MgCa0.8, whereas parameters were increasing again at the end of the observation period. B-lymphocytes were found more often in MgCa0.8 indicating humoral immunity and the presence of soluble antigens. Conversely, S316L displayed a higher quantity of T-lymphocytes. Moderate inflammation was detected in both implant materials and resolved to a minimum during the first weeks indicating comparable biocompatibility for MgCa0.8 and S316L. Thus, the application of MgCa0.8 as biodegradable implant material seems conceivable. Since the inflammatory parameters were re-increasing at the end of the observation period in MgCa0.8 it is important to observe the development of inflammation over a longer time period in addition to the present study.