Joanne Guthrie

Dr. Joanne Guthrie

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2002 in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJoanne Guthrie
Joanne Guthrie
BLBiing-Hwan Lin
Biing-Hwan Lin
EFElizabeth Frazao
Elizabeth Frazao

20 April 2015 in Psychology & Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJoanne Guthrie
Joanne Guthrie
LMLisa Mancino
Lisa Mancino
CLChung‐Tung Jordan Lin
Chung‐Tung Jordan Lin

28 September 2007 in Journal of School Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TOTerrence P. O’toole
Terrence P. O’toole
SASusan Anderson
Susan Anderson
CMClare Miller
Clare Miller
JGJoanne Guthrie
Joanne Guthrie

1 March 2002 in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJoanne Guthrie
Joanne Guthrie
BLBiing-Hwan Lin
Biing-Hwan Lin

22 January 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSarah Forrestal
Sarah Forrestal
EPElizabeth Potamites
Elizabeth Potamites
JGJoanne Guthrie
Joanne Guthrie
NPNora Paxton
Nora Paxton
The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 updated the nutrition standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs (NSLP and SBP) and expanded universal free meals’ availability in low-income schools. Past studies have shown that school meals are an important resource for children in food-insecure households. This analysis used data from the School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study to classify students as food insecure (FI), marginally secure (MS), or food secure (FS). Diet quality from school and nonschool foods that students consumed was assessed using Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2010 scores. Chi-squared and two-tailed t-tests were conducted to compare school meal participation, students’ energy intakes, and diet quality across food security groups. FI and MS students were significantly more likely to participate in NSLP than FS students (79%, 71%, and 49%, respectively). SBP participation followed a similar pattern but was lower (38% FI, 33% MS, and 16% FS). Compared to FS students, FI and MS students more likely attended schools offering SBP, universal free meals, or afterschool snacks and suppers. School meals contributed significantly more energy to FI and MS students’ diets than to FS students (22%, 20%, and 13%, respectively). All groups’ dietary intakes from school foods were of higher quality than non-school foods. These findings highlight the role of school meals in meeting the energy and diet quality needs of FI and MS students.

1 September 2017 in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJoanne Guthrie
Joanne Guthrie