Noelia Sabater-Cruz

Dr. Noelia Sabater-Cruz

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 September 2021 in Cell and Tissue Banking
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMaria Luisa Pérez
Maria Luisa Pérez
SBSaúl Barreales
Saúl Barreales
Noelia Sabater-CruzNoelia Sabater-Cruz
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
EMEva María Martínez-Conesa
Eva María Martínez-Conesa
AVA. Vilarrodona A. Vilarrodona
A. Vilarrodona A. Vilarrodona
Ricardo Casaroli-MaranoRicardo Casaroli-Marano
Ricardo Casaroli-Marano

17 April 2021 in International Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Noelia Sabater-CruzNoelia Sabater-Cruz
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
MFMarc Figueras-Roca
Marc Figueras-Roca
MFMiriam Ferrán-Fuertes
Miriam Ferrán-Fuertes
EAElba Agusti
Elba Agusti
EMEva María Martínez-Conesa
Eva María Martínez-Conesa
PMPablo Infiesta Madurga
Pablo Infiesta Madurga

10 June 2021 in Vision
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSandra Boniquet Sanchez
Sandra Boniquet Sanchez
Noelia Sabater-CruzNoelia Sabater-Cruz
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular poor vision affecting up to 3.7% of the global population. Classically, the first step in treatment has been optical correction, followed by patching and/or pharmacological treatment. However, this is an evolving scenario, since researchers and clinicians are interested in new binocular treatments due to the increasing development of new technologies. In this article main, current binocular treatments as Dig Rush, falling blocks, I-BiT, Occlu-tab, Vivid Vision, and movies are reviewed for binocular amblyopia management.

22 January 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJOSEP TORRAS
JOSEP TORRAS
IBirene blanco-domínguez
irene blanco-domínguez
José-María Sánchez-GonzálezJosé-María Sánchez-González
José-María Sánchez-González
RRRahul Rachwani
Rahul Rachwani
JSJuan-Felipe Spencer
Juan-Felipe Spencer
Carlos Rocha-de-LossadaCarlos Rocha-de-Lossada
Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
Background: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and observational case series study between DMEK and UT-DSAEK were presented. Visual acuity, refractive status and corneal quality assessment were compared between both endothelial keratoplasty techniques. The sample consisted of 20 eyes (10 patients) diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. All measurements were performed preoperatively and at six months after surgery. Analyzed data included the measurement of objective scattering index, modulation transfer function, Strehl ratio, and optical quality assessment (OQAS) values. Contrast sensitivity, subjective patient satisfaction, visual acuity, tomography, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and refraction status were also analyzed. Results: Objective and subjective visual quality variables had similar results among UT-DSAEK and DMEK procedures. Statistically significant differences favoring DMEK against UT-DSAEK were found in endothelial cell density (658.80 ± 139.33 and 1059.00 ± 421.84 cells/mm2, respectively), pachymetry (621.20 ± 33.74 and 529.70 ± 30.00 µm, respectively), and follow-up (45.50 ± 24.76 and 15.50 ± 8.43 months, respectively). Conclusions: UT-DSAEK and DMEK revealed no differences in terms of objective and subjective visual quality. However, DMEK showed a faster recovery during the follow-up, increased endothelial cell density, lower pachymetry, and a more anatomical posterior keratometry against UT-DSAEK in this case series paired-eye study.

8 April 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Noelia Sabater-CruzNoelia Sabater-Cruz
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
MFMarc Figueras-Roca
Marc Figueras-Roca
LPLydia Padró-Pitarch
Lydia Padró-Pitarch
JTJaume Tort
Jaume Tort
RCRicardo P. Casaroli-Marano
Ricardo P. Casaroli-Marano
Purpose: To report corneal transplant activity carried out in Catalonia (Spain) and the evolving indications for keratoplasty over an 8-year period.Methods: Annual reports from the Catalan Transplant Organization, Spain, on corneal graft indications and techniques from 2011 to 2018 were reviewed.Results: A total of 9457 keratoplasties were performed in Catalonia, from January 2011 to December 2018. The most frequent indications were bullous keratopathy (BK; 20.5%), Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED; 17.9%), re-graft (13.7%), and keratoconus (11.3%). Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) accounted for 63.4% of all performed keratoplasties. Since the introduction of eye bank precut tissue for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in 2013 and for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in 2017 the number of endothelial keratoplasties has drastically increased. An increasing trend of posterior lamellar techniques over the total of keratoplasties was found (p<0.001). Endothelial keratoplasties for different endothelial diseases indications (BK, FED, and re-graft), also showed and increasing trend (p<0.001). DMEK is the technique with the highest increase (statistically significantly different from linearity) over other endothelial keratoplasties in FED (p<0.001) but not in BK (p = 0.67) or re-grafts (p = 0.067).Conclusion: Endothelial diseases represented the top indication for keratoplasty over the 8-year period. PKP is still the most used technique in Catalonia, but endothelial keratoplasties and especially DMEK showed a significant increasing trend over the last years. This is congruent with the main rationale nowadays for keratoplasties: to customize and transplant as less tissue as possible. Therefore, the availability of precut tissue could have definitely enforced such approach.

13 July 2020 in Cell and Tissue Banking
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Noelia Sabater-CruzNoelia Sabater-Cruz
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
MFMarc Figueras-Roca
Marc Figueras-Roca
AVAndrea González Ventosa
Andrea González Ventosa
LPLydia Padró-Pitarch
Lydia Padró-Pitarch
JTJaume Tort
Jaume Tort
Ricardo Casaroli-MaranoRicardo Casaroli-Marano
Ricardo Casaroli-Marano