Ning Mao

Dr. Ning Mao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Journal of the American College of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao
PYPing Yin
Ping Yin
QWQinglin Wang
Qinglin Wang
MLMeijie Liu
Meijie Liu
JDJianjun Dong
Jianjun Dong
NHNan Hong
Nan Hong

30 June 2020 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao
PYPing Yin
Ping Yin
QLQin Li
Qin Li
QWQinglin Wang
Qinglin Wang
MLMeijie Liu
Meijie Liu
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao

11 October 2022 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJing Gao
Jing Gao
XZXin Zhong
Xin Zhong
WLWenjuan Li
Wenjuan Li
QLQin Li
Qin Li
HSHuafei Shao
Huafei Shao
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao

4 April 2023 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SZShijie Zhang
Shijie Zhang
HSHuafei Shao
Huafei Shao
WLWenjuan Li
Wenjuan Li
HZHaicheng Zhang
Haicheng Zhang
FLFan Lin
Fan Lin
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao

15 September 2020 in Cancer Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMeijie Liu
Meijie Liu
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao
HMHeng Ma
Heng Ma
JDJianjun Dong
Jianjun Dong
KZKun Zhang
Kun Zhang
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao
Background: To establish pharmacokinetic parameters and a radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Methods: A total of 164 breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were prospectively enrolled from December 2017 to May 2018, and underwent DCE-MRI before surgery. Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics features were derived from DCE-MRI data. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was used to select features, which were then utilized to construct three classification models, namely, the pharmacokinetic parameters model, the radiomics model, and the combined model. These models were built through the logistic regression method by using 10-fold cross validation strategy and were evaluated on the basis of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. An independent validation dataset was used to confirm the discriminatory power of the models. Results: Seven radiomics features were selected by LASSO logistic regression. The radiomics model, the pharmacokinetic parameters model, and the combined model yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.89), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.86), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.89), respectively, for the training cohort and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.90), and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.91), respectively, for the validation cohort. The combined model showed the best performance for the preoperative evaluation of SLN metastasis in breast cancer. Conclusions: The model incorporating radiomics features and pharmacokinetic parameters can be conveniently used for the individualized preoperative prediction of SLN metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

30 October 2020 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFan Lin
Fan Lin
ZWZhongyi Wang
Zhongyi Wang
KZKun Zhang
Kun Zhang
PYPing Yang
Ping Yang
HMHeng Ma
Heng Ma
NMNing Mao
Ning Mao
Objectives: To develop a radiomics nomogram that incorporates contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-based radiomics features and clinico-radiological variables for identifying benign and malignant breast lesions of sub-1 cm. Methods: This retrospective study included 139 patients with the diameter of sub-1 cm on cranial caudal (CC) position of recombined images. Radiomics features were extracted from low-energy and recombined images on CC position. The variance threshold, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms were used to select optimal predictive features. Radiomics signature (Rad-score) was calculated by a linear combination of selected features. The independent predictive factors were identified by ANOVA and multivariate logistic regression. A radiomics nomogram was developed to predict the malignant probability of lesions. The performance and clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Nineteen radiomics features were selected to calculate Rad-score. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category and age were identified as predictive factors. The radiomics nomogram combined with Rad-score, BI-RADS category, and age showed better performance (area under curves [AUC]: 0.940, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804–0.992) than Rad-score (AUC: 0.868, 95% CI: 0.711–0.958) and clinico-radiological model (AUC: 0.864, 95% CI: 0.706–0.956) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve and DCA showed that the radiomics nomogram had good consistency and clinical utility. Conclusions: The radiomics nomogram incorporated with CESM-based radiomics features, BI-RADS category and age could identify benign and malignant breast lesions of sub-1 cm.