Lian Pin Koh

Lian Pin Koh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 September 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLuke Gibson
Luke Gibson
TLTien Ming Lee
Tien Ming Lee
LKLian Pin Koh
Lian Pin Koh
BBBarry Brook
Barry Brook
TGToby A. Gardner
Toby A. Gardner
NSNavjot S. Sodhi
Navjot S. Sodhi

1 December 2004 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNavjot S. Sodhi
Navjot S. Sodhi
LKLian Pin Koh
Lian Pin Koh
BBBarry Brook
Barry Brook
PNPeter K.L. Ng
Peter K.L. Ng

1 June 2008 in Conservation Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLian Pin Koh
Lian Pin Koh
DWDavid S. Wilcove
David S. Wilcove
Oil palm is one of the world's most rapidly expanding equatorial crops. The two largest oil palm‐producing countries—Indonesia and Malaysia—are located in Southeast Asia, a region with numerous endemic, forest‐dwelling species. Oil palm producers have asserted that forests are not being cleared to grow oil palm. Our analysis of land‐cover data compiled by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization suggests that during the period 1990–2005, 55%–59% of oil palm expansion in Malaysia, and at least 56% of that in Indonesia occurred at the expense of forests. Using data on bird and butterfly diversity in Malaysia's forests and croplands, we argue that conversion of either primary or secondary (logged) forests to oil palm may result in significant biodiversity losses, whereas conversion of pre‐existing cropland (rubber) to oil palm results in fewer losses. To safeguard the biodiversity in oil palm‐producing countries, more fine‐scale and spatially explicit data on land‐use change need to be collected and analyzed to determine the extent and nature of any further conversion of forests to oil palm; secondary forests should be protected against conversion to oil palm; and any future expansion of oil palm agriculture should be restricted to pre‐existing cropland or degraded habitats.

4 March 2009 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NSNavjot S. Sodhi
Navjot S. Sodhi
MPMary Rose C. Posa
Mary Rose C. Posa
TLTien Ming Lee
Tien Ming Lee
DBDavid Bickford
David Bickford
LKLian Pin Koh
Lian Pin Koh
BBBarry Brook
Barry Brook

1 June 2012 in Tropical Conservation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLian Pin Koh
Lian Pin Koh
Serge WichSerge Wich
Serge Wich
Tropical deforestation continues to be a major driver of biodiversity loss and greenhouse gas emissions. Remote sensing technology is increasingly used to assess changes in forest cover, species distributions and carbon stocks. However, satellite and airborne sensors can be prohibitively costly and inaccessible for researchers in developing countries. Here, we describe the development and use of an inexpensive (<$2,000) unmanned aerial vehicle for surveying and mapping forests and biodiversity (referred to as ‘Conservation Drone’ hereafter). Our prototype drone is able to fly pre-programmed missions autonomously for a total flight time of ~25 minutes and over a distance of ~15 km. Non-technical operators can program each mission by defining waypoints along a flight path using an open-source software. This drone can record videos at up to 1080 pixel resolution (high definition), and acquire aerial photographs of <10 cm pixel resolution. Aerial photographs can be stitched together to produce real-time geo-referenced land use/cover maps of surveyed areas. We evaluate the performance of this prototype Conservation Drone based on a series of test flights in Aras Napal, Sumatra, Indonesia. We discuss the further development of Conservation Drone 2.0, which will have a bigger payload and longer range. Initial tests suggest a flight time of ~50 minutes and a range of ~25 km. Finally, we highlight the potential of this system for environmental and conservation applications, which include near real-time mapping of local land cover, monitoring of illegal forest activities, and surveying of large animal species.

10 September 2004 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKLian Pin Koh
Lian Pin Koh
RDRobert R. Dunn
Robert R. Dunn
NSNavjot S. Sodhi
Navjot S. Sodhi
RCRobert K. Colwell
Robert K. Colwell
HPHeather C. Proctor
Heather C. Proctor
VSVincent S. Smith
Vincent S. Smith
To assess the coextinction of species (the loss of a species upon the loss of another), we present a probabilistic model, scaled with empirical data. The model examines the relationship between coextinction levels (proportion of species extinct) of affiliates and their hosts across a wide range of coevolved interspecific systems: pollinating Ficus wasps and Ficus , parasites and their hosts, butterflies and their larval host plants, and ant butterflies and their host ants. Applying a nomographic method based on mean host specificity (number of host species per affiliate species), we estimate that 6300 affiliate species are “coendangered” with host species currently listed as endangered. Current extinction estimates need to be recalibrated by taking species coextinctions into account.