Lingjie Liao

Dr. Lingjie Liao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 November 2023 in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HCHongli Chen
Hongli Chen
JHJingjing Hao
Jingjing Hao
JHJing Hu
Jing Hu
CSChang Song
Chang Song
YZYesheng Zhou
Yesheng Zhou
HXHui Xing
Hui Xing
Background: Emerging HIV drug resistance caused by increased usage of antiretroviral drugs (ARV) could jeopardize the success of standardized HIV management protocols in resource-limited settings. Objective: We aimed to characterize pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) among HIV-positive individuals and risk factors in China in 2022. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using 2-stage systematic sampling according to the World Health Organization’s surveillance guidelines in 8 provincial-level administrative divisions in 2022. Demographic information and plasma samples were obtained from study participants. PDR was analyzed using the Stanford HIV drug resistance database, and the Tamura-Nei 93 model in HIV-TRACE was used to calculate pairwise matches with a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions per site. Logistic regression was used to identify and estimate factors associated with PDR. Results: PDR testing was conducted on 2568 participants in 2022. Of the participants, 34.8% (n=893) were aged 30-49 years, 81.4% (n=2091) were male, and 3.2% (n=81) had prior ARV exposure. The prevalence of PDR to protease and reverse transcriptase regions, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors were 7.4% (n=190), 6.3% (n=163), 1.2% (n=32), and 0.2% (n=5), respectively. Yunnan, Jilin, and Zhejiang had much higher PDR incidence than did Sichuan. The prevalence of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–related drug resistance was 6.1% (n=157) for efavirenz and 6.3% (n=163) for nevirapine. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that participants who had prior ARV exposure (odds ratio [OR] 7.45, 95% CI 4.50-12.34) and the CRF55_01B HIV subtype (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.41-4.83) were significantly associated with PDR. Among 618 (24.2%) sequences (nodes) associated with 253 molecular transmission clusters (size range 2-13), drug resistance mutation sites included K103, E138, V179, P225, V106, V108, L210, T215, P225, K238, and A98. Conclusions: The overall prevalence of PDR in China in 2022 was modest. Targeted genotypic PDR testing and medication compliance interventions must be urgently expanded to address PDR among newly diagnosed people living with HIV in China.

21 November 2014 in AIDS Research and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYuncong Wang
Yuncong Wang
HXHui Xing
Hui Xing
LLLingjie Liao
Lingjie Liao
ZWZhe Wang
Zhe Wang
BSBin Su
Bin Su
YSYiming Shao
Yiming Shao
We built a cohort study of HIV patients taking long-term first-line Antiretroviral Therapy in 2003. In this assay, we focused on the development of primary drug resistance mutations against Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI), K103N, Y181C and G190A. The cohort study was built in Henan province, China. We used Single Genome Amplification (SGA) to analyze the frequency of K103N, Y181C and G190A in serial plasma samples of three individual patients. We also performed standard genotype HIV drug resistance assay in 204 patients of this cohort study to analyze the frequency of these mutations. In the SGA sequences, the K103N decreased and vanished, while the frequency of Y181C and G190A increased in individual patient receiving long-term Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). In the sequences of standard genotype HIV drug resistance assay, the frequency of K103N, Y181C and G190A had the similar pattern with that in SGA sequences. Among these patients, the viral suppression were still sufficient after receiving ART for 72 months, and 78.6% (160/204) patients could have their CD4 count over than 200cells/ul. In some patients, first-line ART had the possibility to provide sufficient treatment effect for over than 72 months, but in long-term treatment, the dominant NNRTI drug resistance mutation K103N could reduced, while the proportion of variants with mutation Y181C or G190A may increased. This result was not similar with that in vitro study, which state that variant with K103N or Y181C had an equal viral fitness with wild type.

25 February 2021 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Miaomiao LiMiaomiao Li
Miaomiao Li
SLShujia Liang
Shujia Liang
CZChao Zhou
Chao Zhou
MCMin Chen
Min Chen
SLShu Liang
Shu Liang
LLLingjie Liao
Lingjie Liao
Patients with antiretroviral therapy interruption have a high risk of virological failure when re-initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART), especially those with HIV drug resistance. Next-generation sequencing may provide close scrutiny on their minority drug resistance variant. A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with ART interruption in five regions in China in 2016. Through Sanger and next-generation sequencing in parallel, HIV drug resistance was genotyped on their plasma samples. Rates of HIV drug resistance were compared by the McNemar tests. In total, 174 patients were included in this study, with a median 12 (interquartile range (IQR), 6–24) months of ART interruption. Most (86.2%) of them had received efavirenz (EFV)/nevirapine (NVP)-based first-line therapy for a median 16 (IQR, 7–26) months before ART interruption. Sixty-one (35.1%) patients had CRF07_BC HIV-1 strains, 58 (33.3%) CRF08_BC and 35 (20.1%) CRF01_AE. Thirty-four (19.5%) of the 174 patients were detected to harbor HIV drug-resistant variants on Sanger sequencing. Thirty-six (20.7%), 37 (21.3%), 42 (24.1%), 79 (45.4%) and 139 (79.9) patients were identified to have HIV drug resistance by next-generation sequencing at 20% (v.s. Sanger, p = 0.317), 10% (v.s. Sanger, p = 0.180), 5% (v.s. Sanger, p = 0.011), 2% (v.s. Sanger, p < 0.001) and 1% (v.s. Sanger, p < 0.001) of detection thresholds, respectively. K65R was the most common minority mutation, of 95.1% (58/61) and 93.1% (54/58) in CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC, respectively, when compared with 5.7% (2/35) in CRF01_AE (p < 0.001). In 49 patients that followed-up a median 10 months later, HIV drug resistance mutations at >20% frequency such as K103N, M184VI and P225H still existed, but with decreased frequencies. The prevalence of HIV drug resistance in ART interruption was higher than 15% in the survey. Next-generation sequencing was able to detect more minority drug resistance variants than Sanger. There was a sharp increase in minority drug resistance variants when the detection threshold was below 5%.

12 November 2021 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XXXiaoshan Xu
Xiaoshan Xu
LLLiuhong Luo
Liuhong Luo
CSChang Song
Chang Song
JLJianjun Li
Jianjun Li
HCHuanhuan Chen
Huanhuan Chen
YRYuhua Ruan
Yuhua Ruan
Background: Pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) can limit the effectiveness of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PDR among HIV-positive individuals that initiated antiretroviral therapy in 2014–2020 in southwestern China.Methods: Consecutive cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Qinzhou, Guangxi. We obtained blood samples from individuals who were newly diagnosed with HIV in 2014–2020. PDR and genetic networks analyses were performed by HIV-1 pol sequences using the Stanford HIV-database algorithm and HIV-TRACE, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the potential factors associated with PDR.Results: In total, 3236 eligible HIV-positive individuals were included. The overall prevalence of PDR was 6.0% (194/3236). The PDR frequency to NNRTI (3.3%) was much higher than that of NRTI (1.7%, p < 0.001) and PI (1.2%, p < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PDR was significantly higher among individuals aged 18–29 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.79, 95% CI 1.28–2.50) or 30–49 (aOR: 2.82, 95% CI 1.73–4.82), and harboring CRF08_BC (aOR: 3.23, 95% CI 1.58–6.59). A total of 1429 (43.8%) sequences were linked forming transmission clusters ranging in size from 2 to 119 individuals. Twenty-two individuals in 10 clusters had the same drug resistant mutations (DRMs), mostly to NNRTIs (50%, 5/10).Conclusions: The overall prevalence of PDR was medium, numerous cases of the same DRMs among genetically linked individuals in networks further illustrated the importance of surveillance studies for mitigating PDR.

29 April 2025 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJingjing Hao
Jingjing Hao
XLXiu Liu
Xiu Liu
DWDong Wang
Dong Wang
HHHongping Hu
Hongping Hu
FLFangyuan Li
Fangyuan Li
HXHui Xing
Hui Xing
Background: Transmitted drug resistance (TDR) may compromise the effect of antiretroviral therapy (ART), highlighting the necessity for continuous monitoring. Methods: The study was conducted across 31 provincial-level administrative divisions of China. Demographic information and blood samples were collected from participants at diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection between April and June 2023. TDR and molecular transmission networks were analyzed based on partial pol sequences via the Stanford HIV drug resistance database and HIV-TRACE, respectively. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with TDR. Results: HIV drug resistance genotyping was successfully performed on plasma samples from 6654 individuals. The overall TDR prevalence was 11.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%–12.2%). Resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) was 7.9%, 0.8%, 2.4%, and 1.0%, respectively. TDR to efavirenz/nevirapine (EFV/NVP) was 6.5%. According to the surveillance drug resistance mutation list, the prevalence of TDR to total, NNRTIs, NRTIs, PIs, and INSTIs was 8.2%, 6.4%, 1.0%, 0.7%, and 0.4%. Multivariable analysis linked TDR to non-Han ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.17–1.79]), unknown transmission routes (AOR, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.33–4.90]), and CD4 ≥500 cells/μL (AOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05–1.58]). Higher education (high school or more) reduced TDR odds (AOR, 0.77 vs primary education). Conclusions: TDR among people with newly diagnosed HIV in China exceeds 10%, with EFV/NVP TDR >5%. Timely monitoring of TDR and adjustment of ART regimens are essential to mitigate the impact of drug resistance on treatment efficacy.

9 October 2015 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJing Wang
Jing Wang
ZWZhe Wang
Zhe Wang
JLJia Liu
Jia Liu
YYYanchao Yue
Yanchao Yue
SYShimei Yang
Shimei Yang
YSYiming Shao
Yiming Shao
Antiretroviral therapy has significantly expanded and an increased proportion of patients have switched to second-line regimens in China. We describe the outcomes of second-line therapy among patients having received long-term first-line ART. A prospective follow-up study was conducted in rural areas in China. We compared the virological, immunological outcomes and genotypic drug resistance (DR) profiles before and after regimen switches. A total of 303 patients were enrolled, 283 (93.4%) were retained at 12 months. Of 90 participants with HIV-RNA ≥ 1000 copies/ml before switch, the proportion of viral load (VL) ≥ 1000 copies/ml at 6 and 12 months was 49.4% and 43.9%, respectively. Of 213 patients with HIV-RNA < 1000 copies/ml before switch, the proportion of VL ≥ 1000 copies/ml at 6 and 12 months was 4.8% and 6.5%, respectively. The rates of drug resistance to NNRTIs, NRTIs, PIs decreased from 65.5%, 53.3%, and 1.1% before regimen switch to 26.8%, 18.3%, and 0% at 12 months, respectively. DDI-based initial ART regimens and missing doses in past month were associated with HIV RNA ≥ 1000 copies/ml at 12 months. The results showed that patients having received long-term first-line ART and experiencing virological failure had good virological outcomes after switching to second-line treatment in China.