Mark Miodownik

Prof. Mark Miodownik

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JDJohn R. Davis
John R. Davis
ALAndrei Luchici
Andrei Luchici
FMFuad Mosis
Fuad Mosis
JTJames Thackery
James Thackery
JSJesus A. Salazar
Jesus A. Salazar
BSBrian M. Stramer
Brian M. Stramer
Contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) is a multifaceted process that causes many cell types to repel each other upon collision. During development, this seemingly uncoordinated reaction is a critical driver of cellular dispersion within embryonic tissues. Here, we show that Drosophila hemocytes require a precisely orchestrated CIL response for their developmental dispersal. Hemocyte collision and subsequent repulsion involves a stereotyped sequence of kinematic stages that are modulated by global changes in cytoskeletal dynamics. Tracking actin retrograde flow within hemocytes in vivo reveals synchronous reorganization of colliding actin networks through engagement of an inter-cellular adhesion. This inter-cellular actin-clutch leads to a subsequent build-up in lamellar tension, triggering the development of a transient stress fiber, which orchestrates cellular repulsion. Our findings reveal that the physical coupling of the flowing actin networks during CIL acts as a mechanotransducer, allowing cells to haptically sense each other and coordinate their behaviors.

12 April 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VCVito Conte
Vito Conte
FUFlorian Ulrich
Florian Ulrich
BBBuzz Baum
Buzz Baum
JMJose Munoz
Jose Munoz
JVJim Veldhuis
Jim Veldhuis
MMMark Miodownik
Mark Miodownik
The article provides a biomechanical analysis of ventral furrow formation in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Ventral furrow formation is the first large-scale morphogenetic movement in the fly embryo. It involves deformation of a uniform cellular monolayer formed following cellularisation, and has therefore long been used as a simple system in which to explore the role of mechanics in force generation. Here we use a quantitative framework to carry out a systematic perturbation analysis to determine the role of each of the active forces observed. The analysis confirms that ventral furrow invagination arises from a combination of apical constriction and apical–basal shortening forces in the mesoderm, together with a combination of ectodermal forces. We show that the mesodermal forces are crucial for invagination: the loss of apical constriction leads to a loss of the furrow, while the mesodermal radial shortening forces are the primary cause of the internalisation of the future mesoderm as the furrow rises. Ectodermal forces play a minor but significant role in furrow formation: without ectodermal forces the furrow is slower to form, does not close properly and has an aberrant morphology. Nevertheless, despite changes in the active mesodermal and ectodermal forces lead to changes in the timing and extent of furrow, invagination is eventually achieved in most cases, implying that the system is robust to perturbation and therefore over-determined.

30 January 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAyse Lisa Allison
Ayse Lisa Allison
FLFabiana Lorencatto
Fabiana Lorencatto
SMSusan Michie
Susan Michie
MMMark Miodownik
Mark Miodownik
Biodegradable and compostable plastic packaging (BCPP) has the potential to reduce a global plastic waste problem. We aimed to identify influences on buying BCPP as a basis for designing strategies that enable BCPP’s environmental benefits. Using a UK-focused citizen science dataset, we thematically analysed 610 survey responses to a question exploring reasons for BCPP purchase. Themes are categorised as barriers and enablers and according to the components of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour. Key barriers concerned: psychological capability (not understanding terminology used to label packaging, not taking notice of packaging, and preferring other types of packaging and product qualities); reflective motivation (negative beliefs about BCPP’s environmental impacts and skepticism over decomposition claims), and physical opportunity (no access to appropriate waste management). Key enablers concern: reflective motivation (positive beliefs about BCPP’s environmental impact and resolve to behave pro-environmentally) and physical opportunity (access to appropriate waste management). Reducing ambiguity concerning the labels of biodegradable and compostable may reduce skepticism over environmental claims of packaging. Interventions should improve information about the source of the packaging material, how the packaging waste is processed, and how to dispose of the packaging. This will not be sufficient unless facilities for local BCPP waste collection and processing are increased.

20 May 2022 in Frontiers in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NTNutcha Taneepanichskul
Nutcha Taneepanichskul
DPDanielle Purkiss
Danielle Purkiss
MMMark Miodownik
Mark Miodownik
As a result of public pressure and government legislation to reduce plastic waste there has been a sharp rise in the manufacture and use of alternatives to conventional plastics including compostable and biodegradable plastics. If these plastics are not collected separately, they can contaminate plastic recycling, organic waste streams, and the environment. To deal with this contamination requires effective identification and sorting of these different polymer types to ensure they are separated and composted at end of life. This review provides the comprehensive overview of the identification and sorting technologies that can be applied to sort compostable and biodegradable plastics including gravity-based sorting, flotation sorting, triboelectrostatic sorting, image-based sorting, spectral based sorting, hyperspectral imaging and tracer-based sorting. The advantages and limitations of each sorting approach are discussed within a circular economy framework.

1 May 2020 in UCL Open Environment Preprint
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
AAAyse Lisa Allison
Ayse Lisa Allison
EAEsther Ambrose-Dempster
Esther Ambrose-Dempster
TATeresa Domenech Aparsi
Teresa Domenech Aparsi
MBMaria Bawn
Maria Bawn
MAMiguel Casas Arredondo
Miguel Casas Arredondo
JWJohn Ward
John Ward

1 December 2018 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RJRichard J. Jackson
Richard J. Jackson
AWAdam Wojcik
Adam Wojcik
MMMark Miodownik
Mark Miodownik