In recent years of expanding legalization, older adults have reported the largest increase in cannabis use of any age group. While its use has been studied extensively in young adults, little is known about the effects of THC in older adults and whether the risks of cannabis might be different, particularly concerning intoxication and cognition. The current study investigated whether age is associated with the deleterious effects of THC on cognitive performance and other behavioral measures before and after ad libitum self-administration of three different types of cannabis flower (THC dominant, THC + CBD, and CBD dominant). Age groups consisted of young adults (ages 21–25) and older adults (ages 55–70). Controlling for pre-use scores on all measures, the THC dominant chemovar produced a greater deleterious effect in younger adults compared with older adults in tests of learning and processing speed, whereas there were no differences between old and young in the effects of the other chemovars. In addition, the young group reported greater cannabis craving than the older group after using the THC chemovar. Consistent with some reports in the preclinical literature, the findings suggest that older adults may be less sensitive to the effects of THC on cognitive and affective measures.

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effects of cannabis on alcohol consumption, with some studies suggesting that cannabis is a substitute for alcohol, whereas others suggest that cannabis complements alcohol, thereby increasing drinking. Cannabidiol (CBD) has shown preclinical promise in decreasing alcohol consumption. This study explores the effects of cannabis containing different potencies of CBD and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on alcohol consumption. In this naturalistic observational study, 120 cannabis and alcohol-using adults (mean age = 33.2 years, 39.2% female, 83.3% white) were assigned to use one of three legal-market cannabis strains (predominantly THC, predominantly CBD, and CBD + THC) ad libitum for 5 days. Timeline Followback data on drinking and cannabis use were collected at a baseline session pertaining to the 30 days prior to the ad libitum period, and data regarding alcohol and cannabis use during the 5-day period were collected at follow-up (FU), immediately following the 5-day period. Regression models tested strain differences in drinking outcomes during the ad libitum period. Orthogonal contrast codes were created comparing the CBD group with the other two groups and comparing the THC group with the CBD + THC group. The CBD group drank fewer drinks per drinking day (p < .05), had fewer alcohol use days (p < .05), and fewer alcohol and cannabis co-use days (p < .05) compared with the other groups. No differences emerged between the THC and the CBD + THC group. Cannabinoid content should be considered in studies of alcohol and cannabis co-use. Findings are consistent with preclinical work, suggesting that CBD may be associated with decreased alcohol consumption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Background: The popularity of edible cannabis products continues to grow in states with legal cannabis access, but few studies have investigated the acute effects of these commercially available products. The present study sought to explore the effects of three commercially available edible products with different levels of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Methods: A sample of regular cannabis users ( N =99) were evaluated. Fifty participants completed the study procedures in-person, whereas 49 participants completed the study procedures remotely via Zoom. Subjective effects and plasma cannabinoid levels (in-person participants only) were assessed before and 2 h after participants self - administered one of three products ad libitum : a THC-dominant edible product, a CBD-dominant edible product, or a THC+CBD edible product. Results: At the 2-h post-use assessment, among in-person participants, plasma THC and CBD levels were robustly correlated with self-reported milligrams of THC and CBD consumed, respectively. Across all three conditions, in-person and remote participants experienced (1) an increase in subjective intoxication and elation, (2) a decrease in tension, and (3) no change in paranoia from pre-use to post-use. At post-use, participants who used a CBD product reported less intoxication relative to participants who used a THC+CBD or THC-only product. Participants who used a THC+CBD product reported consuming less THC—and displayed lower plasma THC levels (in-person participants)—relative to participants who used a THC-only product, despite reporting similar levels of positive (intoxication, elation, liking) and psychotomimetic (paranoia, tension) effects. Psychotomimetic effects were very low among both in-person and remote participants across all three conditions, and there were no post-use differences across conditions. Conclusions: Findings suggest that experienced users who consumed a THC+CBD product reported similar levels of positive and psychotomimetic effects relative to those who consumed a THC-only product, despite consuming less THC and displaying lower plasma THC concentrations. Given the potential harms associated with acute cannabis reward and long-term THC exposure, further research is needed to establish whether edible cannabis products with CBD pose less risk to users. Future studies should examine whether these effects generalize to samples of infrequent users, who may have less experience with edible cannabis use. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03522103.

Background: Eicosanoids-lipid mediators derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid-have a notable role in inflammatory signaling. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been shown in preclinical studies to modulate inflammatory pathways the modulating the enzymes that generate eicosanoids, namely lipoxygenase (LOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450). Methods: This present study aimed to investigate how CBD and THC effect plasma levels of eicosanoids generated through LOX, COX, and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) pathways. Using plasma sample data from multiple clinical studies, we tested the hypothesis that high-CBD cannabis use would increase eicosanoid levels compared with high-THC cannabis. Results: Following cannabis use, high-CBD cannabis led to a rise in plasma eicosanoids, particularly lipoxins, while high-THC cannabis did not. Conclusions: CBD promoted anti-inflammatory eicosanoid production via the 15-LOX pathway, therefore supporting the potential role of CBD as a therapeutic candidate for inflammatory diseases.