Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections were efficacious in clinical trials, several patients exhibited a poor response. This study aimed to compare clinical features between patients who were susceptible to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for DME and those who were not. A single-center, retrospective study of 102 such patients was conducted (123 eyes; mean ± standard deviation age, 63.4 ± 10.8 years; 57.8% males). Systemic and ocular data, assessed at baseline and after a month, were compared between good (>20% decrease in central macular thickness (CMT)) and poor (≤20% decrease in CMT) responders using the Mann–Whitney U test/Fisher’s exact test. Eighty-one eyes (65.9%) were good responders. The glycosylated hemoglobin level was higher (p = 0.011) in poor (7.5% ± 0.94%) than in good (7.04% ± 1.19%) responders. The foveal avascular zone was larger (p = 0.0003) in poor (0.67 ± 0.33 μm²) than in good (0.47 ± 0.23 μm²) responders. The number of microaneurysms in the pericapillary network was higher (p = 0.0007) in poor (2.7 ± 2.2) than in good (1.4 ± 2.0) responders. Baseline glycemic control and macular ischemia may be associated with the short-term response to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

We aimed to investigate the relationship between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) and treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) for macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients with treatment-naive BRVO-ME who underwent IVA treatment between March 2016 and February 2017. There was no significant difference in visual acuity within 6 months (0.29 ± 0.20 vs. 0.27 ± 0.19, p = 0.338), the mean central foveal thickness improvement (332.0 ± 162.2 μm vs. 303.9 ± 166.6 μm, p = 0.492), and the mean number of IVA injections (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 times, p = 0.658) between the SCT thickened (n = 26 patients, 26 eyes) and SCT non-thickened groups (n = 20 patients, 20 eyes). The rate of ME recurrence was significantly lower in the SCT decreased group (6/17 eyes (35.2%) vs. 19/30 eyes (63.3%); p = 0.038). In conclusion, pretreatment choroidal thickening does not affect the therapeutic effect of IVA for BRVO, but ME recurrence was lower in cases of treatment-related choroidal thinning. Thus, changes in SCT may be a therapeutic indicator of IVA for acute BRVO.