Matjaž Gregorič

Dr. Matjaž Gregorič

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 December 2018 in Systematic Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Matjaž KuntnerMatjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner
CHChris A Hamilton
Chris A Hamilton
RCRen-Chung Cheng
Ren-Chung Cheng
Matjaž GregoričMatjaž Gregorič
Matjaž Gregorič
NLNik Lupše
Nik Lupše
JBJason E Bond
Jason E Bond
Instances of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) provide the context for rigorous tests of biological rules of size evolution, such as Cope's rule (phyletic size increase), Rensch's rule (allometric patterns of male and female size), as well as male and female body size optima. In certain spider groups, such as the golden orbweavers (Nephilidae), extreme female-biased SSD (eSSD, female:male body length $\ge$2) is the norm. Nephilid genera construct webs of exaggerated proportions, which can be aerial, arboricolous, or intermediate (hybrid). First, we established the backbone phylogeny of Nephilidae using 367 anchored hybrid enrichment markers, then combined these data with classical markers for a reference species-level phylogeny. Second, we used the phylogeny to test Cope and Rensch's rules, sex specific size optima, and the coevolution of web size, type, and features with female and male body size and their ratio, SSD. Male, but not female, size increases significantly over time, and refutes Cope's rule. Allometric analyses reject the converse, Rensch's rule. Male and female body sizes are uncorrelated. Female size evolution is random, but males evolve toward an optimum size (3.2-4.9 mm). Overall, female body size correlates positively with absolute web size. However, intermediate sized females build the largest webs (of the hybrid type), giant female Nephila and Trichonephila build smaller webs (of the aerial type), and the smallest females build the smallest webs (of the arboricolous type). We propose taxonomic changes based on the criteria of clade age, monophyly and exclusivity, classification information content, and diagnosability. Spider families, as currently defined, tend to be between 37 million years old and 98 million years old, and Nephilidae is estimated at 133 Ma (97-146), thus deserving family status. We, therefore, resurrect the family Nephilidae Simon 1894 that contains Clitaetra Simon 1889, the Cretaceous GeratonephilaPoinar and Buckley (2012), Herennia Thorell 1877, IndoetraKuntner 2006, new rank, Nephila Leach 1815, Nephilengys L. Koch 1872, Nephilingis Kuntner 2013, Palaeonephila Wunderlich 2004 from Tertiary Baltic amber, and TrichonephilaDahl 1911, new rank. We propose the new clade Orbipurae to contain Araneidae Clerck 1757, Phonognathidae Simon 1894, new rank, and Nephilidae. Nephilid female gigantism is a phylogenetically ancient phenotype (over 100 Ma), as is eSSD, though their magnitudes vary by lineage.

20 May 2015 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Matjaž GregoričMatjaž Gregorič
Matjaž Gregorič
IAIngi Agnarsson
Ingi Agnarsson
TBTodd A. Blackledge
Todd A. Blackledge
MKMatjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner

20 July 2016 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJonathan Coddington
Jonathan Coddington
IAIngi Agnarsson
Ingi Agnarsson
RCRen-Chung Cheng
Ren-Chung Cheng
KČKlemen Čandek
Klemen Čandek
ADAmy Driskell
Amy Driskell
Matjaž KuntnerMatjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner
The use of unique DNA sequences as a method for taxonomic identification is no longer fundamentally controversial, even though debate continues on the best markers, methods, and technology to use. Although both existing databanks such as GenBank and BOLD, as well as reference taxonomies, are imperfect, in best case scenarios “barcodes” (whether single or multiple, organelle or nuclear, loci) clearly are an increasingly fast and inexpensive method of identification, especially as compared to manual identification of unknowns by increasingly rare expert taxonomists. Because most species on Earth are undescribed, a complete reference database at the species level is impractical in the near term. The question therefore arises whether unidentified species can, using DNA barcodes, be accurately assigned to more inclusive groups such as genera and families—taxonomic ranks of putatively monophyletic groups for which the global inventory is more complete and stable. We used a carefully chosen test library of CO1 sequences from 49 families, 313 genera, and 816 species of spiders to assess the accuracy of genus and family-level assignment. We used BLAST queries of each sequence against the entire library and got the top ten hits. The percent sequence identity was reported from these hits (PIdent, range 75–100%). Accurate assignment of higher taxa (PIdent above which errors totaled less than 5%) occurred for genera at PIdent values >95 and families at PIdent values ≥ 91, suggesting these as heuristic thresholds for accurate generic and familial identifications in spiders. Accuracy of identification increases with numbers of species/genus and genera/family in the library; above five genera per family and fifteen species per genus all higher taxon assignments were correct. We propose that using percent sequence identity between conventional barcode sequences may be a feasible and reasonably accurate method to identify animals to family/genus. However, the quality of the underlying database impacts accuracy of results; many outliers in our dataset could be attributed to taxonomic and/or sequencing errors in BOLD and GenBank. It seems that an accurate and complete reference library of families and genera of lifecouldprovide accurate higher level taxonomic identifications cheaply and accessibly, within years rather than decades.

25 July 2019 in Communications Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJessica E. Garb
Jessica E. Garb
RHRobert A. Haney
Robert A. Haney
ESEvelyn E. Schwager
Evelyn E. Schwager
Matjaž GregoričMatjaž Gregorič
Matjaž Gregorič
Matjaž KuntnerMatjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner
TBTodd A. Blackledge
Todd A. Blackledge
Darwin’s bark spider (Caerostris darwini) produces giant orb webs from dragline silk that can be twice as tough as other silks, making it the toughest biological material. This extreme toughness comes from increased extensibility relative to other draglines. We show C. darwini dragline-producing major ampullate (MA) glands highly express a novel silk gene transcript (MaSp4) encoding a protein that diverges markedly from closely related proteins and contains abundant proline, known to confer silk extensibility, in a unique GPGPQ amino acid motif. This suggests C. darwini evolved distinct proteins that may have increased its dragline’s toughness, enabling giant webs. Caerostris darwini’s MA spinning ducts also appear unusually long, potentially facilitating alignment of silk proteins into extremely tough fibers. Thus, a suite of novel traits from the level of genes to spinning physiology to silk biomechanics are associated with the unique ecology of Darwin’s bark spider, presenting innovative designs for engineering biomaterials.

16 May 2022 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matjaž GregoričMatjaž Gregorič
Matjaž Gregorič
DKDenis Kutnjak
Denis Kutnjak
KBKatarina Bačnik
Katarina Bačnik
CGCene Gostinčar
Cene Gostinčar
APAnja Pecman
Anja Pecman
Matjaž KuntnerMatjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner

14 October 2011 in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSimona Kralj-Fišer
Simona Kralj-Fišer
JSJutta M. Schneider
Jutta M. Schneider
ŽJŽiva Justinek
Živa Justinek
SKSabina Kalin
Sabina Kalin
Matjaž GregoričMatjaž Gregorič
Matjaž Gregorič
MKMatjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner