Martin Hall

Dr. Martin Hall

Natural History Museum, London
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

47Years (1980-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2006 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jens AmendtJens Amendt
Jens Amendt
Carlo CampobassoCarlo Campobasso
Carlo Campobasso
EGEmmanuel Gaudry
Emmanuel Gaudry
CRChristian Reiter
Christian Reiter
HLHélène N. LeBlanc
Hélène N. LeBlanc
Martin HallMartin Hall
Martin Hall
Forensic entomology, the use of insects and other arthropods in forensic investigations, is becoming increasingly more important in such investigations. To ensure its optimal use by a diverse group of professionals including pathologists, entomologists and police officers, a common frame of guidelines and standards is essential. Therefore, the European Association for Forensic Entomology has developed a protocol document for best practice in forensic entomology, which includes an overview of equipment used for collection of entomological evidence and a detailed description of the methods applied. Together with the definitions of key terms and a short introduction to the most important methods for the estimation of the minimum postmortem interval, the present paper aims to encourage a high level of competency in the field of forensic entomology.

7 January 2011 in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jens AmendtJens Amendt
Jens Amendt
CRC. S. Richards
C. S. Richards
Carlo CampobassoCarlo Campobasso
Carlo Campobasso
RZR. Zehner
R. Zehner
Martin HallMartin Hall
Martin Hall

1 January 1995
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
Martin HallMartin Hall
Martin Hall
RWRichard Wall
Richard Wall

1 January 2000 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRonald Arlen Sherman
Ronald Arlen Sherman
Martin HallMartin Hall
Martin Hall
STS. Thomas
S. Thomas
▪ Abstract Certain fly larvae can infest corpses or the wounds of live hosts. Those which are least invasive on live hosts have been used therapeutically, to remove dead tissue from wounds, and promote healing. This medicinal use of maggots is increasing around the world, due to its efficacy, safety and simplicity. Given our low cultural esteem for maggots, the increasing use and popularity of maggot therapy is evidence of its utility. Maggot therapy has successfully treated many types of chronic wounds, but much clinical and basic research is needed still. In this review, the biology of myiasis and the history of maggot therapy are presented, the current status of our understanding and clinical use of medicinal maggots is discussed, and opportunities for future research and applications are proposed.

1 December 2003 in Forensic Science International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZAZoe J.O. Adams
Zoe J.O. Adams
Martin HallMartin Hall
Martin Hall

17 June 2019 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSzymon Matuszewski
Szymon Matuszewski
Martin HallMartin Hall
Martin Hall
GMGaétan Moreau
Gaétan Moreau
KSKenneth G. Schoenly
Kenneth G. Schoenly
ATAaron M. Tarone
Aaron M. Tarone
MVMartin H. Villet
Martin H. Villet
Most studies of decomposition in forensic entomology and taphonomy have used non-human cadavers. Following the recommendation of using domestic pig cadavers as analogues for humans in forensic entomology in the 1980s, pigs became the most frequently used model cadavers in forensic sciences. They have shaped our understanding of how large vertebrate cadavers decompose in, for example, various environments, seasons and after various ante- or postmortem cadaver modifications. They have also been used to demonstrate the feasibility of several new or well-established forensic techniques. The advent of outdoor human taphonomy facilities enabled experimental comparisons of decomposition between pig and human cadavers. Recent comparisons challenged the pig-as-analogue claim in entomology and taphonomy research. In this review, we discuss in a broad methodological context the advantages and disadvantages of pig and human cadavers for forensic research and rebut the critique of pigs as analogues for humans. We conclude that experiments using human cadaver analogues (i.e. pig carcasses) are easier to replicate and more practical for controlling confounding factors than studies based solely on humans and, therefore, are likely to remain our primary epistemic source of forensic knowledge for the immediate future. We supplement these considerations with new guidelines for model cadaver choice in forensic science research.