Lucia Curti

Dr. Lucia Curti

CASPR Biotech
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2020 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Lucia CurtiLucia Curti
Lucia Curti
PFPereyra-Bonnet Federico
Pereyra-Bonnet Federico
GAGimenez Carla Alejandra
Gimenez Carla Alejandra
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has received global attention due to the recent outbreak in China. In this work, we report a CRISPR-Cas12 based diagnostic tool to detect synthetic SARS-CoV-2 RNA sequences in a proof-of-principle evaluation. The test proved to be sensitive, rapid, and potentially portable. These key traits of the CRISPR method are critical for virus detection in regions that lack resources to use the currently available methods.

5 March 2021 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lucia CurtiLucia Curti
Lucia Curti
IPIvana Primost
Ivana Primost
SVSofia Valla
Sofia Valla
Daiana Ibañez AlegreDaiana Ibañez Alegre
Daiana Ibañez Alegre
CPCecilia Olguin Perglione
Cecilia Olguin Perglione
Debora MarconeDebora Marcone
Debora Marcone
We evaluated a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection (Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit) based on reverse transcription, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-Cas12 reaction. From a total of 210 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using spin columns, the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 105/105 (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.55–100) positive samples and 104/105 (99.05%; 95% CI: 94.81–99.97) negative samples that were previously tested using commercial RT-qPCR. The estimated overall Kappa index was 0.991, reflecting an almost perfect concordance level between the two diagnostic tests. An initial validation test was also performed on 30 nasopharyngeal samples collected in lysis buffer, in which the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 20/21 (95.24%; 95% CI: 76.18–99.88) positive samples and 9/9 (100%; 95% CI: 66.37–100) negative samples. The estimated Kappa index was 0.923, indicating a strong concordance between the test procedures. The Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was suitable for detecting a wide range of RT-qPCR-positive samples (cycle threshold range: 11.45–36.90) and dilutions of heat-inactivated virus (range: 2.5–100 copies/µL); no cross-reaction was observed with the other respiratory pathogens tested. We demonstrated that the performance of the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was similar to that of commercial RT-qPCR, as the former was highly sensitive and specific, timesaving (1.5 h), inexpensive, and did not require sophisticated equipment. The use of this kit would reduce the time taken for diagnosis and facilitate molecular diagnosis in low-resource laboratories.

24 July 2020 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
CGCarla Alejandra Gimenez
Carla Alejandra Gimenez
Lucia CurtiLucia Curti
Lucia Curti
HHHyon Sung Ho
Hyon Sung Ho
GLGrosembacher Luis
Grosembacher Luis
PRPablo Juan Ross
Pablo Juan Ross
PFPereyra-Bonnet Federico
Pereyra-Bonnet Federico
CRISPR-based systems for epigenetic editing are promising molecular tools that could be harnessed for directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. We used the CRISPR/dCas9-VP160, CRISPR/dCas9-TET1 and CRISPR/dCas9-P300 systems for multiplex epigenetic editing and activation of human beta pancreatic genes ( PDX1, NEUROG3, PAX4 and INS ). The CRISPR/dCas9-P300 system was the most effective at activating genes with reduced number of sgRNA. Using small number of sgRNA per gene was important to induce multiplex gene activation. Combined activation of transcription factors (TFs) involved in beta cell development resulted in INS gene expression; in which sequential TFs activation was more effective than simultaneous activation. Full CRISPR RNA-based delivery system was able to activate all targeted genes. Overall, this study shows the utility of CRISPR tools for epigenetic editing and directed cellular differentiation.