Critical reflection is effective in improving students’ communication abilities and confidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a work-based critical reflection program to enhance novice nurses’ clinical critical-thinking abilities, communication competency, and job performance. The present study used a quasi-experimental design. From October 2014 to August 2015, we collected data from 44 novice nurses working in an advanced general hospital in S city in Korea. Nurses in the experimental group participated in a critical reflection program for six months. Outcome variables were clinical critical-thinking skills, communication abilities, and job performance. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test and a Wilcoxon rank sum test were selected to evaluate differences in mean ranks and to assess the null hypothesis that the medians were equal across the groups. The results showed that the clinical critical-thinking skills of those in the experimental group improved significantly (p = 0.003). The differences in mean ranks of communication ability between two groups was significantly statistically different (p = 0.028). Job performance improved significantly in both the experimental group and the control group, so there was no statistical difference (p = 0.294). We therefore suggest that a critical reflection program be considered an essential tool for improving critical thinking and communication abilities among novice nurses who need to adapt to the clinical environment as quickly as possible. Further, we suggest conducting research into critical reflection programs among larger and more diverse samples.

The demand for advanced practice nurses (APNs) has increased globally due to a shortage of physicians and an increased demand for high-quality healthcare. Research is needed on the enhancement of advanced practice nurses' organization commitment. Organization commitment (OC) directly impacts the retention of APNs. This study aims to identify the key factors affecting the OC of advanced practice nurses. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the largest hospital in South Korea. A total of 189 APNs answered survey questions. A partial least squares-structural equation modeling method was employed to analyze the survey responses. A pay scale of APNs is positively associated with person-organization fit (POF). However, the effect of job location and computer self-efficacy on POF is not significant. Job satisfaction plays a salient direct role in supervision and POF. Job satisfaction is also a significant moderator in the relationship between supervision and POF. POF is significantly associated with both OC and supervision. Supervision has a positive effect on organization commitment. Pay scale, job satisfaction, supervision, and POF are significant factors affecting organization commitment. Establishing an intra-organization entity, such as APN steering committee, to ensure mutual consensus and transparent communication between administrators and APNs would enhance POF, the rating of supervision, and organization commitment.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics and predictors of falls in high- and low-risk inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Korea. Methods: Fallers' data were extracted from quality improvement reports and electronic health records from June 1, 2014, to May 31, 2015. Data on nonfallers matched by the length of hospitalization and medical departments of fallers were extracted from electronic health records. Participants were classified into a high- or a low-risk group based on their Morse Fall Scale score, fall risk–related symptoms, and medications known to increase fall risk. Characteristics of falls and risk factors were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis, respectively. Results: In the high-risk group, education, surgery, department, impaired mobility, intravenous catheter placement, use of ambulatory aid, gait disturbance, and some medications were significantly different between the fallers and nonfallers. From these variables, education, operation, department, intravenous catheter placement, gait disturbance, and use of narcotics, vasodilators, antiarrhythmics, and hypnotics were statistically significant factors for falls. In the low-risk group, sex, age, length of hospitalization, surgery, department, diagnosis, and mental status were significantly different between the fallers and nonfallers. From these, sex, age, length of hospitalization, surgery, and liver-digestive diseases were statistically significant factors for falls. Conclusions: Characteristics and risk factors for falls differed between the risk groups. Fall prevention strategies need to be tailored to the risk groups and fall risk assessment tools need to be revised accordingly.