Elisabeth Cardis

Elisabeth Cardis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 November 2023 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMagda Bosch de Basea
Magda Bosch de Basea
ITIsabelle Thierry-Chef
Isabelle Thierry-Chef
RHRichard Harbron
Richard Harbron
MHMichael Hauptmann
Michael Hauptmann
GBGraham Byrnes
Graham Byrnes
ECElisabeth Cardis
Elisabeth Cardis
Over one million European children undergo computed tomography (CT) scans annually. Although moderate- to high-dose ionizing radiation exposure is an established risk factor for hematological malignancies, risks at CT examination dose levels remain uncertain. Here we followed up a multinational cohort (EPI-CT) of 948,174 individuals who underwent CT examinations before age 22 years in nine European countries. Radiation doses to the active bone marrow were estimated on the basis of body part scanned, patient characteristics, time period and inferred CT technical parameters. We found an association between cumulative dose and risk of all hematological malignancies, with an excess relative risk of 1.96 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.12) per 100 mGy (790 cases). Similar estimates were obtained for lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Results suggest that for every 10,000 children examined today (mean dose 8 mGy), 1–2 persons are expected to develop a hematological malignancy attributable to radiation exposure in the subsequent 12 years. Our results strengthen the body of evidence of increased cancer risk at low radiation doses and highlight the need for continued justification of pediatric CT examinations and optimization of doses.

1 January 2017 in Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJanet Hall
Janet Hall
PJPenny A. Jeggo
Penny A. Jeggo
CWCatharine Mary Louise West
Catharine Mary Louise West
MGMaria Gomolka
Maria Gomolka
RQRoel Quintens
Roel Quintens
ECElisabeth Cardis
Elisabeth Cardis

1 August 2018 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLaura Ellen Birks
Laura Ellen Birks
BSBenjamin Struchen
Benjamin Struchen
Marloes EeftensMarloes Eeftens
Marloes Eeftens
LWLuuk van Wel
Luuk van Wel
AHAnke Huss
Anke Huss
MGMonica Guxens
Monica Guxens

1 February 2021 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EPElisa Pasqual
Elisa Pasqual
FBFrançois Boussin
François Boussin
DBDimitry Bazyka
Dimitry Bazyka
ANArvid Nordenskjold
Arvid Nordenskjold
MYMichiko Yamada
Michiko Yamada
ECElisabeth Cardis
Elisabeth Cardis
The last decades have seen increased concern about the possible effects of low to moderate doses of ionizing radiation (IR) exposure on cognitive function. An interdisciplinary group of experts (biologists, epidemiologists, dosimetrists and clinicians) in this field gathered together in the framework of the European MELODI workshop on non-cancer effects of IR to summarise the state of knowledge on the topic and elaborate research recommendations for future studies in this area. Overall, there is evidence of cognitive effects from low IR doses both from biology and epidemiology, though a better characterization of effects and understanding of mechanisms is needed. There is a need to better describe the specific cognitive function or diseases that may be affected by radiation exposure. Such cognitive deficit characterization should consider the human life span, as effects might differ with age at exposure and at outcome assessment. Measurements of biomarkers, including imaging, will likely help our understanding on the mechanism of cognitive-related radiation induced deficit. The identification of loci of individual genetic susceptibility and the study of gene expression may help identify individuals at higher risk. The mechanisms behind the radiation induced cognitive effects are not clear and are likely to involve several biological pathways and different cell types. Well conducted research in large epidemiological cohorts and experimental studies in appropriate animal models are needed to improve the understanding of radiation-induced cognitive effects. Results may then be translated into recommendations for clinical radiation oncology and imaging decision making processes.

19 September 2017 in European Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMaureen Hatch
Maureen Hatch
ECElisabeth Cardis
Elisabeth Cardis

1 December 2018 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Marloes EeftensMarloes Eeftens
Marloes Eeftens
BSBenjamin Struchen
Benjamin Struchen
LBLaura Ellen Birks
Laura Ellen Birks
ECElisabeth Cardis
Elisabeth Cardis
MEMarisa Estarlich
Marisa Estarlich
Martin RöösliMartin Röösli
Martin Röösli
Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) from mobile communication technologies is changing rapidly. To characterize sources and associated variability, we studied the differences and correlations in exposure patterns between children aged 8 to 18 and their parents, over the course of the day, by age, by activity pattern, and for different metrics of exposure. Using portable RF-EMF measurement devices, we collected simultaneous real-time personal measurements of RF-EMF over 24 to 72 h in 294 parent-child pairs from Denmark, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Switzerland, and Spain. The devices measured the power flux density (mW/m2) in 16 different frequency bands every 4 s, and activity diary Apps kept by the participants were used to collect time-activity information in real-time. We analyzed their exposures by activity, for the different source constituents of exposure: downlink (radiation emitted from mobile phone base stations), uplink (transmission from phone to base station), broadcast, DECT (digital enhanced cordless telecommunications) and Wi-Fi. We looked at the correlations between parents and children overall, during day (06:00-22.00) and night (22:00-06:00) and while spending time at home. The mean of time-weighted average personal exposures was 0.16 mW/m2 for children and 0.15 mW/m2 for parents, on average predominantly originating from downlink sources (47% for children and 45% for parents), followed by uplink (18% and 27% respectively) and broadcast (25% and 19%). On average, exposure for downlink and uplink were highest during the day, and for Wi-Fi and DECT during the evening. Exposure during activities where most of the time is spent (home, school and work) was relatively low whereas exposure during travel and outside activities was higher. Exposure to uplink increased with age among young people, while DECT decreased slightly. Exposure to downlink, broadcast, and Wi-Fi showed no obvious trend with age. We found that exposure to total RF-EMF is correlated among children and their parents (Rspearman = 0.45), especially while at home (0.62) and during the night (0.60). Correlations were higher for environmental sources such as downlink (0.57) and broadcast (0.62) than for usage-related exposures such as uplink (0.29). The generation gap between children and their parents is mostly evident in uplink exposure, due to more and longer uplink and cordless phone calls among parents, and their tendency to spend slightly more time in activities with higher environmental RF-EMF exposure, such as travel. Despite these differences in personal behavior, exposure to RF-EMF is moderately correlated between children and their parents, especially exposures resulting from environmental RF-EMF sources.