Purpose A meta-analysis was performed to compare the rates of the major complications associated with two gastrostomy tube placement techniques in a pediatric population: laparoscopy-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Methods The PubMed electronic database was queried for comparative studies of the two insertion techniques. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was used for the assessment of the quality and risk of bias in the included studies. The main outcome measure was the frequency of major complications defined as the need for reoperation within 30 days or death. RevMan 5.3, was used, with a p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results Eight studies including 1550 patients met the inclusion criteria. The risk for major complications was higher in PEG than in LAG 3.86 (95% confidence interval 1.90–7.81; p < 0.0002). The number needed to treat to reduce one major complication by performing LAG instead of PEG was 23. There were no randomized-controlled trials. Overall, the quality of the included studies was determined to be unsatisfactory. Conclusions PEG placement was associated with a significantly higher risk of major complications compared to LAG placement. Therefore, LAG should be the preferred method for gastrostomy tube placement in children.
There is still a lack of knowledge regarding the natural course of resolution of hydronephrosis after pyeloplasty, and no consensus exists on how resolution of hydronephrosis is defined or when resolution is expected to occur. To determine when resolution of hydronephrosis occurs following pyeloplasty, by type of obstruction and by surgical approach. This retrospective study included 125 children age 50% reduction of APD) and 2-year success rate. Exposure was surgical approach and type of obstruction (intrinsic/extrinsic). Survival analysis was performed, adjusting for age, gender, year, laterality, preoperative renal function on MAG3, calyces dilatation and APD in the multivariable analysis. At 12 months and 24 months follow-up, 90% and 93% had reached resolution, respectively. All children with persistent dilatation had improved drainage and stable or improved function on MAG3. There was no difference in time to resolution of hydronephrosis between open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (adjusted HR 0.90, [0.54-1.52], p = 0.70), nor between different types of obstruction (aHR 0.84 [0.53-1.34], p = 0.47). Eight children had re-intervention, all identified within 3 months after primary surgery, and four had a postoperative drop on MAG3, giving a total success rate of 91% (121/135). The vast majority of cases resolve and do so within 12 months from surgery. Since the improvement of hydronephrosis seems small between the first and second year after surgery, the value of follow-up beyond 12 months could be questioned. Based on the present study and previous literature we would recommend that children with persisting dilatation should continue their follow-up with ultrasound beyond 12 months. Children with complete resolution of their hydronephrosis at 12 months do not likely benefit from further follow-up. The same follow-up protocol should be applied, regardless of whether the obstruction is intrinsic or extrinsic in nature, or the surgery is performed with open or robotic-assisted approach. Overall, the definition of resolution of hydronephrosis varies in the literature and have impact on the results and may compromise comparisons. Surgical approach or type of obstruction does not seem to affect time to resolution of hydronephrosis after pyeloplasty in children. Follow-up with ultrasound beyond 12 months does not seem to benefit children with complete resolution.
Aim of the Study. To assess the frequency of and identify contributing factors to wound dehiscence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in children born with anorectal malformations (ARM). Methods. Ethical approval was obtained (DNR 2017/191). Charts of all children with anorectal malformations (ARM) reconstructed with PSARP, limited PSARP, or PSARVUP at a tertiary centre of paediatric surgery between 2001 and 2016 were reviewed. Wound dehiscence within 30 days postoperatively was analysed regarding gender, prematurity, birth weight, type of ARM, other congenital malformations, single- or multistaged reconstruction, age and weight at reconstruction, postoperative antibiotics, and fasting. Multiple regression analysis was performed for risk factors in single-stage PSARP or limited PSARP, presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Main Results. Ninety patients were included, of which 53 (59%) were males. Single-staged PSARP was performed in 40 (44%) patients and 50 (56%) had a multistaged reconstruction with a colostomy. Wound dehiscence was significantly more common among patients without a colostomy; 17 (43%) vs. 11 (22%) (p=0.043). In patients with single-stage PSARP, no single factor was identified to increase the risk for wound dehiscence: cardiac malformations (OR 3.73) (95% CI 0.78-17.88), low weight at surgery (OR 1.56) (95% CI 0.36-6.99), antibiotics < 1 day (OR 1.6) (95% CI 0.43-5.94), or short fasting 0-3 days (OR 4.44) (95% CI 0.47-42.18). Conclusions. A divided colostomy protected against wound dehiscence after PSARP. No risk factor for wound dehiscence after single-staged PSARP was identified. Further studies are needed to establish contributing factors to uncomplicated wound healing after PSARP.