Aortic arch repair is a challenging intervention. Open surgical repair is still considered the gold standard, but in high-risk patients, it is not always a reasonable option, making endovascular approaches an enticing, when not the only available, alternative for treatment. The strategies more commonly adopted are surgical supra-aortic trunk (SAT) rerouting followed by deployment of a standard thoracic endoprosthesis, chimney techniques, custom-made scalloped, fenestrated, and branched devices, and in situ or physician-modified fenestrations. If we excluded techniques involving SAT rerouting where the arch anatomy is surgically modified in order to make deployment in the aortic arch of a standard thoracic endoprosthesis possible, in the other techniques, one or more SATs are incorporated in the thoracic endoprosthesis. In these cases, no matter what solution is adopted, because of the morphology of the aorta at this level, achieving an ideal sealing is extremely difficult, and endovascular treatments of the arch are burdened by an increased risk of type IA endoleaks. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. We identified 1277 records. After reading titles, abstracts, and full texts, we excluded 1231 records. Exclusion criteria were low-quality evidence, abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, reviews, editorials, and expert opinions. A total of 48 studies were included, for a total of 3114 patients. A type IA endoleak occurred in 248 patients (7.7%) with a mean incidence of 18.8% in chimney procedures, 4.8% and 3%, respectively, in fenestrated and branched devices, and 2.2% in in situ fenestration. We excluded from our analysis scalloped technology that is used when the target vessel originates from a healthy landing zone and represents a different anatomical setting. Type IA endoleaks are a concern with all types of endovascular aortic arch repair, and they can compromise the outcomes of the procedure. The rate of type IA endoleaks appears to be significantly higher in chimney procedures. In order to maximize sealing, whenever possible, endovascular repair of the arch should be achieved with custom-made fenestrated devices. However, chimney configurations are still a valuable solution particularly in the emergency setting, although in such a procedure, to guarantee accurate postoperative management and follow-up, an imaging protocol could be useful.

Atherosclerosis-related coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. This requires effective primary and secondary prevention in reducing the complications related to CAD; the regression or stabilization of the pathology remains the mainstay of treatment. Statins have proved to be the most effective treatment in reducing adverse effects, but there are limitations related to the administration and achievement of effective doses as well as side effects due to the lack of target-related molecular specificity. The implemented technological steps are polymers and nanoparticles for the administration of statins, as it has been seen how the conjugation of drug delivery systems (DDSs) with statins increases bioavailability by circumventing the hepatic–renal filter and increases the related target specificity, enhancing their action and decreasing side effects. Reduction of endothelial dysfunction, reduced intimal hyperplasia, reduced ischemia–reperfusion injury, cardiac regeneration, positive remodeling in the extracellular matrix, reduced neointimal growth, and increased reendothelialization are all drug-related effects of statins enhanced by binding with DDSs. Recent preclinical studies demonstrate how the effect of statins stimulates the differentiation of endogenous cardiac stem cells. Poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) seems to be the most promising DDS as it succeeds more than the others in enhancing the effect of the bound drug. This review intends to summarize the current evidence on polymers and nanoparticles for statin delivery in the field of cardiovascular disease, trying to shed light on this topic and identify new avenues for future studies.

Background: Reliable preoperative identification of carotid plaque instability remains challenging. Although duplex ultrasound allows early detection of carotid stenosis, it does not consistently predict plaque biological behavior. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression and have been implicated in atherosclerotic progression and plaque destabilization. The tissue-level expression of miRNAs in carotid plaques and their relationship with histological vulnerability remain incompletely defined. Methods: This exploratory, pilot, hypothesis-generating study included patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis (>75% NASCET). Plaque vulnerability was assessed using a multiparametric approach combining preoperative duplex ultrasound features (including Gray Scale Median, GSM), intraoperative macroscopic evaluation, and a validated histological scoring system; only plaques with concordant classification across all three modalities were retained for molecular analysis. Total RNA including small RNA was extracted from plaque tissue and miRNA expression was measured by qRT-PCR on a panel of 47 candidate miRNAs. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-eight patients were initially enrolled; after application of strict vulnerability criteria, five plaques (three unstable, two stable) were selected for miRNA profiling. Among the 47 miRNAs assayed, miR-122 and miR-197 showed a consistent descriptive trend toward higher expression in plaques classified as unstable; these plaques also displayed histological features of vulnerability (lipid-rich necrotic cores and inflammatory infiltrates). Given the extremely limited sample size, no inferential statistical comparisons or multiple-testing corrections were performed. Conclusions: In this small, tissue-based exploratory analysis, miR-122 and miR-197 were more highly expressed in plaques with histological features of instability. Due to the small sample size, the effect estimates are unstable, and the findings should be used solely to inform the design and power calculations of future studies. We outline the need of a clear, pragmatic validation pathway based on replication in independent, larger cohorts with standardized tissue handling and blinded assessment and parallel evaluation of circulating miRNA levels to assess noninvasive biomarker potential. Indeed, these findings are preliminary and strictly hypothesis-generating; validation in larger, prospectively collected cohorts and integration with circulating biomarkers and imaging data are required before clinical application.