Implantation of subdural electrodes on the brain surface is still widely performed as one of the “gold standard methods” for the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Stereotactic insertion of depth electrodes to the brain can be added to detect brain activities in deep-seated lesions to which surface electrodes are insensitive. This study tried to clarify the efficacy and limitations of combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes in intractable epilepsy patients. Fifty-three patients with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes for long-term intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) before epilepsy surgery. The detectability of early ictal iEEG change (EIIC) were compared between the subdural and depth electrodes. We also examined clinical factors including resection of MRI lesion and EIIC with seizure freedom. Detectability of EIIC showed no significant difference between subdural and depth electrodes. However, the additional depth electrode was useful for detecting EIIC from apparently deep locations, such as the insula and mesial temporal structures, but not in detecting EIIC in patients with ulegyria (glial scar). Total removal of MRI lesion was associated with seizure freedom. Depth electrodes should be carefully used after consideration of the suspected etiology to avoid injudicious usage.

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) are common in the temporal lobe and can cause drug-resistant epilepsy. Complete resection of LEATs is sufficient for seizure relief. However, hippocampal resection might result in postoperative cognitive impairment. This study aimed to clarify the necessity of hippocampal resection for seizure and cognitive outcomes in patients with temporal lobe LEATs and a normal hippocampus. The study included 32 patients with temporal lobe LEATs and without hippocampal abnormalities. All patients underwent gross total resection as treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy at our tertiary epilepsy center from 2005 to 2020, followed by at least a 12-month follow-up period. Seizure and cognitive outcomes were compared between patients who underwent additional hippocampal resection (Resected group) and those who did not (Preserved group). Among the participants, 14 underwent additional hippocampal resection and 28 (87.5%) achieved seizure freedom irrespective of hippocampal resection. The seizure-free periods were not different between the two groups. Additional hippocampal resection resulted in a significantly negative impact on the postoperative verbal index. In conclusion, additional hippocampal resection in patients with temporal lobe LEATs without hippocampal abnormalities is unnecessary because lesionectomy alone results in good seizure control. Additional hippocampal resection may instead adversely affect the postoperative language function.