Arthur Musakulu Kemoli

Prof. Arthur Musakulu Kemoli

University of Nairobi, College of Health Sciences
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2020 in Annals of Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAna Lucia Seminario
Ana Lucia Seminario
TDTimothy DeRouen
Timothy DeRouen
MCMimansa Cholera
Mimansa Cholera
JLJennifer Liu
Jennifer Liu
PPPrathip Phantumvanit
Prathip Phantumvanit
WPWaranuch Pitiphat
Waranuch Pitiphat
Although oral diseases are largely preventable, they are among the most non-communicable diseases globally, and they disproportionately burden disadvantaged communities, specially within low- and middle-income nations. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the social, economic, and health inequalities in our society, including the existing global oral health inequalities. There is a shortage of dentist-scientist all around the world, especially in developing countries, such as Thailand. The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) and Fogarty International Center (FIC), joined efforts on creating research capacity in oral health in South East Asia through the Fogarty International Center Training Program in Clinical, Public Health and Behavioral Oral Health Research for Thailand (2006–2016). The University of Washington (USA), Thammasat University (Thailand) and Khon Kaen University (Thailand) partnered to conduct short-, medium- and long-term training programs to build regional oral health research capabilities. Investing in research has not only impacted trainees’ career development but enhanced advancement of oral health research of South East Asia. The success of partnership calls for expanding oral health research training in other low-income countries.

30 December 2009 in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKArthur Musakulu Kemoli
Arthur Musakulu Kemoli
WAW. E. van Amerongen
W. E. van Amerongen
GOG. Opinya
G. Opinya

1 June 2010 in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKArthur Musakulu Kemoli
Arthur Musakulu Kemoli
WAW. E. van Amerongen
W. E. van Amerongen
GOG. N. Opinya
G. N. Opinya

7 October 2009 in International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKArthur Musakulu Kemoli
Arthur Musakulu Kemoli
WAWillem Evert Van Amerongen
Willem Evert Van Amerongen

24 October 2018 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKArthur Musakulu Kemoli
Arthur Musakulu Kemoli
HGHans Gjørup
Hans Gjørup
MNMarie-Louise Milvang Nørregaard
Marie-Louise Milvang Nørregaard
MLMark Lindholm
Mark Lindholm
TMTonnie Kituku Mulli
Tonnie Kituku Mulli
DHDorte Haubek
Dorte Haubek
Infant Oral Mutilation (IOM) includes germectomy and early extraction of primary and permanent incisors and canines, primarily in the lower jaw. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence and impact of IOM, involving the removal of mandibular permanent incisors and/or canines, on dental occlusion and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) among Kenyan adolescents from Maasai Mara. In a cross-sectional study, 284 adolescents (14–18 yrs. of age) participated in an oral examination and an interview, using a structured questionnaire on age, gender, medical history, and IOM practice. For the analysis of the dental occlusion, participants with IOM, in terms of absence of two or more permanent teeth in the mandibular incisor and/or canine tooth segments (IOM group), were compared to participants who had all six incisors and canines present in the oral cavity (control group). OHRQoL was assessed using child perception questionnaire (CPQ11–14). The majority of the participants (61%) had been exposed to IOM, among whom 164 (95%) had absence of two mandibular central incisors. More individuals in the IOM group had maxillary overjet exceeding 5 mm than in the control group (50.9% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Nineteen (11%) subjects in the IOM group had mesial occlusion in contrast to none in the control group (p < 0.001). The mean and median total CPQ scores and the mean and median CPQ domain scores were low in both groups with no significant differences between the groups. Approximately two-thirds of the study population presented with IOM, with the majority of them missing two mandibular permanent central incisors. Although some participants with IOM had substantial maxillary overjet and mesial occlusion, only few of them showed substantial effect on their OHRQoL.

1 January 2011 in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKArthur Musakulu Kemoli
Arthur Musakulu Kemoli
WAWillemE Van Amerongen
WillemE Van Amerongen
Background: Although Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach has been in existence for a while, the reasons for the poor performance of multisurface ART restorations are not very clear. Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of oral hygiene, residual caries and cervical marginal-gaps on survival of proximal ART restorations. Settings: Two rural divisions in Kenya were selected for the study. Design: A randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: The 804 children in the study had their baseline- and 2-year dental plaque levels documented. Each child received one proximal restoration in a primary molar using ART approach, together with trained and pre-tested operators/assistants, three glass ionomer cements (GIC)-brands and two tooth-isolation methods. The restorations were clinically evaluated soon after placement and after 2 years. Post-restorative bite-wing radiographs taken soon after restoration were also evaluated. Statistical analysis: Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 14 computer programme was used and results tested using Pearson's correlation, Cox Proportional Hazards regression analysis and Multiple Logistic regression models tests. Results: At baseline and after 2 years, the mean cumulative survival and plaque index changed from 94.4% to 30.8% and 2.34 (Standard Deviation, or SD of 0.46) to 1.92 (SD 2.1) respectively, with higher plaque indices associated with higher restoration failures. Of the 507 radiographs evaluated, 48 (9.5%), 63 (12.4%) and 9 (1.8%) restorations had residual caries (RC), cervical marginal-gaps (CMG) and both RC/CMG respectively. Survival of the restorations with RC/CMG was significantly lower (p = 0.003) compared to those with RC or without RC. Conclusion: Low survival of proximal restorations in the study was associated with the presence of cervical marginal-gaps.