As of June 16, 2020, 8 251 224 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and 445 188 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related deaths had been reported worldwide.¹ Among active cases, 1.6% (54 593 of 3 503 249) are in severe or critical condition.

We leveraged the largely untapped resource of electronic health record data to address critical clinical and epidemiological questions about Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To do this, we formed an international consortium (4CE) of 96 hospitals across five countries (www.covidclinical.net). Contributors utilized the Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) or Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) platforms to map to a common data model. The group focused on temporal changes in key laboratory test values. Harmonized data were analyzed locally and converted to a shared aggregate form for rapid analysis and visualization of regional differences and global commonalities. Data covered 27,584 COVID-19 cases with 187,802 laboratory tests. Case counts and laboratory trajectories were concordant with existing literature. Laboratory tests at the time of diagnosis showed hospital-level differences equivalent to country-level variation across the consortium partners. Despite the limitations of decentralized data generation, we established a framework to capture the trajectory of COVID-19 disease in patients and their response to interventions.

Purpose: TO assess the relation between visual field progression and adherence rate in patients with glaucoma using Travatan Dosing Aid® (TDA). Methods: In this 36-month retrospective study, 35 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma on travoprost or travoprost/timolol fixed combination monotherapy were submitted to ophthalmic examination and to visual field (VF) test from 2007 to 2009. Adherence was recorded with TDA. The association between VF progression (from 2007 to the end of the follow-up period) and a number of predictors (adherence rates at 12 months) was tested by means of chi-square test (or Fisher exact test) or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. Results: The mean (±SD) adherence rates were 71.9%±27.8% after 1 month of follow-up and 76.8%±20.9% at 12 months. A total of 25 (71.4%) patients with stable VF had a median adherence rate (IQR) of 85% (75%-97%); patients who worsened (n=10; 28.6%) recorded a median (IQR) adherence of 21% (9%-45%) (p<0.001). No association was found between VF progression and any of the other variables (age, sex, schooling, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) at baseline and over time, other ocular diseases, time since diagnosis and actual therapy, number of concomitant systemic therapies). Patients who were at least 90% adherent did not progress, while 43.5% of the patients with lower adherence worsened (p=0.01). Conclusions: Our data suggest that adherence rate may play a role in glaucomatous damage and/or progression; the target IOP therefore should be adjusted by adherence rates. Monitoring tools, educational programs, use of videos, a better doctor-patient relationship, or other means to improve adherence are desirable and necessary to preserve visual function.