Declines in plant diversity will likely reduce soil microbial biomass, alter microbial functions, and threaten the provisioning of soil ecosystem services. We examined whether increasing temporal plant biodiversity in agroecosystems (by rotating crops) can partially reverse these trends and enhance soil microbial biomass and function. We quantified seasonal patterns in soil microbial biomass, respiration rates, extracellular enzyme activity, and catabolic potential three times over one growing season in a 12-year crop rotation study at the W. K. Kellogg Biological Station LTER. Rotation treatments varied from one to five crops in a 3-year rotation cycle, but all soils were sampled under a corn year. We hypothesized that crop diversity would increase microbial biomass, activity, and catabolic evenness (a measure of functional diversity). Inorganic N, the stoichiometry of microbial biomass and dissolved organic C and N varied seasonally, likely reflecting fluctuations in soil resources during the growing season. Soils from biodiverse cropping systems increased microbial biomass C by 28–112 % and N by 18–58 % compared to low-diversity systems. Rotations increased potential C mineralization by as much as 53 %, and potential N mineralization by 72 %, and both were related to substantially higher hydrolase and lower oxidase enzyme activities. The catabolic potential of the soil microbial community showed no, or slightly lower, catabolic evenness in more diverse rotations. However, the catabolic potential indicated that soil microbial communities were functionally distinct, and microbes from monoculture corn preferentially used simple substrates like carboxylic acids, relative to more diverse cropping systems. By isolating plant biodiversity from differences in fertilization and tillage, our study illustrates that crop biodiversity has overarching effects on soil microbial biomass and function that last throughout the growing season. In simplified agricultural systems, relatively small increases in crop diversity can have large impacts on microbial community size and function, with cover crops appearing to facilitate the largest increases.

Farmers, scientists, and other soil health stakeholders require interpretable indicators of soil hydraulic function. Determining which indicators to use has been difficult because of measurement disconformity, spatial and temporal variability, recently established treatments, and the effect of site characteristics on management practice differences. The North American Project to Evaluate Soil Health Measurements includes 124 sites uniformly sampled across a range of soil health management practices in North America in 2019. We compare and recommend indicators of hydraulic function that best characterize soil health. We assessed the relationship of each indicator to a suite of soil inherent properties and climate variables, the response of each indicator to soil health management practices, the effect that soil inherent properties (clay content, sand content, and pH) and climatic variables (10‐yr mean annual precipitation and temperature) had on response to management practices, and the relationship among the responses of the indicators to soil health management practices. Field capacity measured on intact cores (θ _{FC_INTACT} ) was the best measure of soil hydraulic function, because it responded to management, represents a direct measure of soil hydraulic function, is proximal to stakeholder values, and its response to management was not significantly influenced by inherent and climatic variables. Other suitable indicators are bulk density, soil organic carbon (SOC), and aggregate stability, which are not direct measures of soil hydraulic function but do respond to management and may be practical in situations in which measuring θ _{FC_INTACT} is not. This study informs selection of soil health indicators to measure soil hydraulic function.

Currently accepted pedotransfer functions show negligible effect of management‐induced changes to soil organic carbon (SOC) on plant available water holding capacity (θ _AWHC ), while some studies show the ability to substantially increase θ _AWHC through management. The Soil Health Institute's North America Project to Evaluate Soil Health Measurements measured water content at field capacity using intact soil cores across 124 long‐term research sites that contained increases in SOC as a result of management treatments such as reduced tillage and cover cropping. Pedotransfer functions were created for volumetric water content at field capacity (θ _FC ) and permanent wilting point (θ _PWP ). New pedotransfer functions had predictions of θ _AWHC that were similarly accurate compared with Saxton and Rawls when tested on samples from the National Soil Characterization database. Further, the new pedotransfer functions showed substantial effects of soil calcareousness and SOC on θ _AWHC . For an increase in SOC of 10 g kg ^–1 (1%) in noncalcareous soils, an average increase in θ _AWHC of 3.0 mm 100 mm ^–1 soil (0.03 m ³ m ^–3 ) on average across all soil texture classes was found. This SOC related increase in θ _AWHC is about double previous estimates. Calcareous soils had an increase in θ _AWHC of 1.2 mm 100 mm ^–1 soil associated with a 10 g kg ^–1 increase in SOC, across all soil texture classes. New equations can aid in quantifying benefits of soil management practices that increase SOC and can be used to model the effect of changes in management on drought resilience.

Conventional agriculture in the Midwest US lacks diversity, relies heavily on external inputs to maintain crop yields, and contributes to soil and water quality degradation. Using diverse crop rotations and incorporating livestock are promising solutions to these and other problems linked to current cropping systems dominated by maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). To better understand how agricultural diversification comprehensively affects soil health and function, we compared 20 soil health parameters linked to critical soil ecosystem services in 1) a conventional 2-year maize-soybean rotation, and 2) a diverse 4-year maize-soybean-oat (Avena sativa L.)+alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)-alfalfa rotation that periodically received cattle manure. The strongest and most salient improvements in soil health from the diversified, 4-year cropping system included: 8% reduction in soil resistance to root growth (p = .006), 16% increase in cation exchange capacity (p = .001), 157% increase in salt-extractable soil carbon (p = .024), and 62% increase in soil microbial biomass (p = .017). These comprehensive improvements in general soil functioning coincided with enhanced crop yields, reduced requirement for agricultural inputs, and decreased environmental impacts – all while maintaining profitability. Despite declines in cropping system diversity globally, but especially in the Midwest US, these results provide strong evidence for the benefits of diversification.