Sergio Navarro-Serna

Mr. Sergio Navarro-Serna

University of Murcia, Veterinary school
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSergio Navarro-Serna
Sergio Navarro-Serna
MVMarcela Vilarino
Marcela Vilarino
IPInsung Park
Insung Park
Joaquin GadeaJoaquin Gadea
Joaquin Gadea
PRPablo Juan Ross
Pablo Juan Ross

1 February 2021 in The CRISPR Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSergio Navarro-Serna
Sergio Navarro-Serna
AHAlaa Hachem
Alaa Hachem
AGAnaluce Canha Gouveia
Analuce Canha Gouveia
AHAli Hanbashi
Ali Hanbashi
GGGabriela Garrappa
Gabriela Garrappa
Joaquin GadeaJoaquin Gadea
Joaquin Gadea
Studies of knockout (KO) mice with defects in the endolysosomal two-pore channels (TPCs) have shown TPCs to be involved in pathophysiological processes, including heart and muscle function, metabolism, immunity, cancer, and viral infection. With the objective of studying TPC2's pathophysiological roles for the first time in a large, more humanlike animal model, TPC2 KO pigs were produced using CRISPR-Cas9. A major problem using CRISPR-Cas9 to edit embryos is mosaicism; thus, we studied for the first time the effect of microinjection timing on mosaicism. Mosaicism was greatly reduced when in vitro produced embryos were microinjected before insemination, and surgical embryo transfer (ET) was performed using such embryos. All TPC2 KO fetuses and piglets born following ET (i.e., F0 generation) were nonmosaic biallelic KOs. The generation of nonmosaic animals greatly facilitates germ line transmission of the mutation, thereby aiding the rapid and efficient generation of KO animal lines for medical research and agriculture.

18 January 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPCelia Piñeiro-Silva
Celia Piñeiro-Silva
SNSergio Navarro-Serna
Sergio Navarro-Serna
RBRamses Belda-Perez
Ramses Belda-Perez
Joaquin GadeaJoaquin Gadea
Joaquin Gadea
The generation of genetically modified pigs has an important impact thanks its applications in basic research, biomedicine, and meat production. Cloning was the first technique used for this production, although easier and cheaper methods were developed, such as the microinjection, electroporation, or lipofection of oocytes and zygotes. In this study, we analyzed the production of genetically modified embryos via lipofection of zona-pellucida-intact oocytes using LipofectamineTM CRISPRMAXTM Cas9 in comparison with the electroporation method. Two factors were evaluated: (i) the increment in the concentration of the lipofectamine–ribonucleoprotein complexes (LRNPC) (5% vs. 10%) and (ii) the concentration of ribonucleoprotein within the complexes (1xRNP vs. 2xRNP). We found that the increment in the concentration of the LRNPC had a detrimental effect on embryo development and a subsequent effect on the number of mutant embryos. The 5% group had a similar mutant blastocyst rate to the electroporation method (5.52% and 6.38%, respectively, p > 0.05). The increment in the concentration of the ribonucleoprotein inside the complexes had no effect on the blastocyst rate and mutation rate, with the mutant blastocyst rate being similar in both the 1xRNP and 2xRNP lipofection groups and the electroporation group (1.75%, 3.60%, and 3.57%, respectively, p > 0.05). Here, we showed that it is possible to produce knock-out embryos via lipofection of zona-pellucida-intact porcine oocytes with similar efficiencies as with electroporation, although more optimization is needed, mainly in terms of the use of more efficient vesicles for encapsulation with different compositions.

13 February 2025 in Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJulieta G. Hamze
Julieta G. Hamze
JCJosep M. Cambra
Josep M. Cambra
SNSergio Navarro-Serna
Sergio Navarro-Serna
Cristina Alicia Martinez-SerranoCristina Alicia Martinez-Serrano
Cristina Alicia Martinez-Serrano
Gene editing technologies, particularly CRISPR/Cas9, have emerged as transformative tools in genetic modification, significantly advancing the use of porcine embryos in biomedical and agricultural research. This review comprehensively examines the various methodologies for gene editing and delivery methods, such as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), microinjection, electroporation, and lipofection. This review, focuses on the advantages or limitations of using different biological sources (in vivo- vs. in vitro oocytes/embryos). Male germ cell manipulation using sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT) and testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT) represent innovative approaches for producing genetically modified animals. Although these technologies have revolutionized the genetic engineering field, all these strategies face challenges, including high rates of off-target events and mosaicism. This review emphasizes the need to refine these methods, with a focus on reducing mosaicism and improving editing accuracy. Further advancements are essential to unlocking the full potential of gene editing for both agricultural applications and biomedical innovations.

22 April 2022 in Theriogenology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SNSergio Navarro-Serna
Sergio Navarro-Serna
MDMartxel Dehesa-Etxebeste
Martxel Dehesa-Etxebeste
CPCelia Piñeiro-Silva
Celia Piñeiro-Silva
RRRaquel Romar
Raquel Romar
JLJordana S. Lopes
Jordana S. Lopes
Joaquin GadeaJoaquin Gadea
Joaquin Gadea
Limb girdle muscular dystrophy type R1 (LGMDR1) is an autosomal recessive myopathy described in humans resulting from a deficiency of calpain-3 protein (CAPN3). This disease lacks effective treatment and an appropriate model, so the generation of KO pigs by CRISPR-Cas9 offers a way to better understand disease ethology and to develop novel therapies. Microinjection is the main method described for gene editing by CRISPR-Cas9 in porcine embryo, but electroporation, which allows handling more embryos faster and easier, has also recently been reported. The objective of the current study was to optimize porcine oocyte electroporation to maximize embryo quality and mutation rate in order to efficiently generate LGMDR1 porcine models. We found that the efficiency of generating CAPN3 KO embryos was highest with 4 electroporation pulses and double sgRNA concentration than microinjection. Direct comparison between microinjection and electroporation demonstrated similar rates of embryo development and mutation parameters. The results of our study demonstrate that oocyte electroporation, an easier and faster method than microinjection, is comparable to standard approaches, paving the way for democratization of transgenesis in pigs.

22 April 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSergio Navarro-Serna
Sergio Navarro-Serna
EOEvelyne París Oller
Evelyne París Oller
OSOndrej Simonik
Ondrej Simonik
RRRaquel Romar
Raquel Romar
Joaquin GadeaJoaquin Gadea
Joaquin Gadea
More suitable and efficient methods to protect gametes from external harmful effects during in vitro handling can be achieved by adding preovulatory porcine oviductal fluid (pOF) to in vitro culture media. The objective of this study was to assess the swim-up procedure’s suitability as a sperm selection method using a medium supplemented with 1mg/mL BSA, 1% preovulatory pOF (v/v), 1% v/v pOF plus 1mg/mL BSA, and 5mg/mL BSA. After selection, various sperm parameters were studied, such as sperm recovery rate, sperm morphology, motility (by CASA), vitality, acrosome status and intracellular calcium (by flow cytometry) and ability to penetrate oocytes in vitro. Around 2% of sperm were recovered after swim-up, and the replacement of BSA by pOF showed a beneficial reduction of motility parameters calcium concentration, resulting in an increased penetration rate. The combination of albumin and oviductal fluid in the medium did not improve the sperm parameters results, whereas a high concentration of BSA increased sperm morphological abnormalities, motility, and acrosome damage, with a reduction of calcium concentration and penetration rate. In conclusion, the replacement of albumin by preovulatory oviductal fluid in the swim-up sperm preparation method modifies boar sperm parameters and improves the in vitro penetration of oocytes.