Seong Ran Jeon

Prof. Dr. Seong Ran Jeon

Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2013 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGene Hyun Bok
Gene Hyun Bok
Seong Ran JeonSeong Ran Jeon
Seong Ran Jeon
JCJoo Young Cho
Joo Young Cho
JCJun-Hyung Cho
Jun-Hyung Cho
WLWoong Cheul Lee
Woong Cheul Lee
EPEui Ju Park
Eui Ju Park

1 January 2013 in Clinical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKi-Nam Shim
Ki-Nam Shim
JMJeong Seop Moon
Jeong Seop Moon
DCDong Kyung Chang
Dong Kyung Chang
JDJae Hyuk Do
Jae Hyuk Do
JKJi Hyun Kim
Ji Hyun Kim
KGKorean Gut Image Study Group
Korean Gut Image Study Group
Shim KN, et al. Clin Endosc. 2013 Jan;46(1):45-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.1.45

1 October 2011 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Seong Ran JeonSeong Ran Jeon
Seong Ran Jeon
WCWon Young Cho
Won Young Cho
SJSo Young Jin
So Young Jin
YCYoung Koog Cheon
Young Koog Cheon
SCSeok Reyol Choi
Seok Reyol Choi
JCJoo Young Cho
Joo Young Cho

5 May 2009 in Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Seong Ran JeonSeong Ran Jeon
Seong Ran Jeon
SES. Eun
S. Eun
CSC. Shim
C. Shim
CRC. Ryu
C. Ryu
JKJ. Kim
J. Kim
SJS. Jin
S. Jin
Background and study aims: The aim of this study in canines was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of self-expandable metal stents, which were coated with paclitaxel to minimize the tissue response. Materials and methods: 14 dogs (5 – 10 kg) were randomly allocated to two groups. Drug-eluting stents (DES, n = 7) or nondrug-eluting stents (non-DES, n = 7) were endoscopically inserted and fixed in the esophagus of healthy dogs. Every 2 weeks, for a maximum period of 8 weeks, an endoscopic examination was performed to evaluate the status of stent insertion, the grade of tissue hyperplasia, and mucosal change at both ends of the stent. Results: One case of stent migration was observed after 4 weeks in the non-DES group. In this group, tissue reaction and hyperplasia remained for more than 4 weeks after stent insertion. By contrast, an endoscopic examination of the surrounding esophageal mucosa in the DES group showed very little tissue reaction, and the stent was easily separated from the esophageal tissue. Conclusion: Although further studies are required to confirm our results, we suggest that these newly designed DES may provide an alternative tool to manage refractory benign esophageal stricture.

30 January 2021 in Intestinal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YJYujin Jeong
Yujin Jeong
Seong Ran JeonSeong Ran Jeon
Seong Ran Jeon
HKHyun Gun Kim
Hyun Gun Kim
JMJung Rock Moon
Jung Rock Moon
TLTae Hee Lee
Tae Hee Lee
SPSuyeon Park
Suyeon Park
Background/Aims: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can serve as biomarkers for diagnosing and assessing disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated their clinical significance in UC.Methods: We analyzed 48 patients with UC who underwent measurement of fecal calprotectin (FC) and endoscopy and 96 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. NLR and PLR were compared between the patients and healthy controls. The endoscopic activity was divided into 2 groups: group 1 (mild to moderate inflammation) and group 2 (severe inflammation) according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore in UC.Results: To diagnose UC, the optimal cutoff of NLR and PLR was 2.26 (sensitivity 54.2%; specificity 90.6%; positive likelihood ratio 5.778, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.944–11.339; area under the curve [AUC] 0.774, 95% CI, 0.690–0.859) and 179.8 (sensitivity 35.4%; specificity 90.6%; positive likelihood ratio 3.778, 95% CI 1.821–7.838; AUC 0.654, 95% CI 0.556–0.753), respectively. The optimal cutoff to differentiate group 1 and group 2 was 3.44, 175.9, and 453 µg/g for NLR, PLR, and FC, respectively (sensitivity, 63.6% vs. 90.9% vs. 81.8%; specificity, 81.1% vs. 78.4% vs. 73.0%; positive likelihood ratio, 3.364 vs. 4.205 vs. 3.027; AUC, 0.714 vs. 0.897 vs. 0.813). PLR had the highest AUC and positive likelihood ratio.Conclusions: NLR and PLR help differentiate patients with UC from healthy controls. NLR, PLR, and FC indicate endoscopic activity and may reflect intestinal mucosal conditions.

1 January 2015 in Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHye Ran Kang
Hye Ran Kang
JLJi-Eun Lee
Ji-Eun Lee
JLJoon Seong Lee
Joon Seong Lee
TLTae Hee Lee
Tae Hee Lee
SHSu Jin Hong
Su Jin Hong
HKHyun Gun Kim
Hyun Gun Kim
Hye Ran Kang, Ji-Eun Lee, Joon Seong Lee, Tae Hee Lee, Su Jin Hong, Jin Oh Kim, Seong Ran Jeon, and Hyun Gun Kim. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;21:126-32. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm14025