Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among cancer patients, often leading to longer hospital stays, discontinuation of cancer treatment, and a poor prognosis. This study aims to provide insight into the incidence of severe AKI in this population and identify the risk factors associated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) and in-hospital mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 3201 patients with cancer and severe AKI admitted to a Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 1995 and July 2023. Severe AKI was defined according to the KDIGO guidelines as grade ≥ 2 AKI with nephrological in-hospital follow-up. Data were analyzed in two timelines: Period A (1995–2010) and Period B (2011–2023). Results: A total of 3201 patients (1% of all hospitalized cases) were included, with a mean age of 62.5 ± 17.2 years. Solid tumors represented 75% of all neoplasms, showing an increasing tendency, while hematological cancer decreased. Obstructive AKI declined, whereas the incidence of sepsis-associated, prerenal, and drug-induced AKI increased. Overall, 20% of patients required RRT, and 26.4% died during hospitalization. A predictive model for RRT (AUC 0.833 [95% CI 0.817–0.848]) identified sepsis and hematological cancer as risk factors and prerenal and obstructive AKI as protective factors. A similar model for overall in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.731 [95% CI 0.71–0.752]) revealed invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), sepsis, and RRT as risk factors and obstructive AKI as a protective factor. The model for hemato-oncological patients’ mortality (AUC 0.832 [95% CI 0.803–0.861]) included IMV, sepsis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and drug-induced AKI. Mortality risk point score models were derived from these analyses. Conclusions: This study addresses the demographic and clinical features of cancer patients with severe AKI. The development of predictive models for RRT and in-hospital mortality, along with risk point scores, may play a role in the management of this population.

Background Kidney disease is a rare manifestation of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and its pathological alterations remain poorly described. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical presentation and pathological alterations on kidney biopsy of AS patients and review and discuss the current literature on the issue. Methods: We retrospectively studied the clinical presentation and kidney pathological alterations of 15 Caucasian AS patients submitted to kidney biopsy between October 1985 and March 2021. Results: Patients were predominantly male (66.7%) with median age at the time of kideney biopsy of 47 years [IQR 34 - 62]. Median serum creatinine at presentation was 1.3 mg/dL [IQR 0.9 - 3] and most patients also had either proteinuria (85.7%) and/or hematuria (42.8%). The most common indication for kidney biopsy was nephrotic syndrome (33.3%), followed by acute or rapidly progressive kidney injury (20%) and chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (20%). Chronic interstitial nephritis (CIN) (n=3) and AA amyloidosis (n=3) were the most common diagnosis. Others included IgA nephropathy (IgAN) (n=2), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n=2), membranous nephropathy (n=1), and immune complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN)(n=1). Conclusions: We present one of the largest series of biopsy-proven kidney disease in Caucasian AS patients. We found a lower prevalence of IgAN than previously reported in Asian cohorts. We found a higher prevalence of CIN and a lower prevalence of AA amyloidosis than that described in previous series of Caucasian patients. We also present the first case of AS-associated IC-MPGN.

Peritonitis is a major peritoneal dialysis complication. Despite a high cure rate, relapsing and repeat peritonitis is associated with Tenckhoff catheter biofilm and multiple episodes of peritoneal damage. In relapsing peritonitis, prompt catheter removal is mandatory; otherwise, in repeat peritonitis, there is not a clear indication for catheter removal. It is questionable if the approach to removal should be different. There are few recent data on repeat and relapsing peritonitis microbiology and clinical outcomes since most studies are from the past decade. This study evaluates the microbiology, clinical outcomes, and impact of relapsing and repeat peritonitis on technique survival and the impact of catheter removal in development of further peritonitis episodes by the same microorganism. We developed a single-center retrospective study from 1998 to 2019 that compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis with a control group in terms of causative microorganisms, cure rate, catheter removal, and permanent and temporary transfer to hemodialysis. We also compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis clinical outcomes when Tenckhoff catheter was not removed. Comparing to the control group, the repeat/relapsing group had a higher cure rate (80.4% versus 74.5%, ) and lower rate of hospitalization (10.9% versus 27.7%, ). Technique survival was superior in the repeat/relapsing group (log rank = 4.5, ). Gram-positive peritonitis was more common in the repeat/relapsing group especially Streptococci viridans (43.5% versus 21.3%, ) and Gram-negatives in the control group (26.6% vs 9.0%, ). When the Tenckhoff catheter was not removed after a repeat episode, 58.6% developed a new repeat/relapsing episode versus 60.0% in the relapsing group. Although repeat and relapsing peritonitis have a higher cure rate, it leads to further episodes of peritonitis and consequent morbidity. When Tenckhoff catheter was not removed, the probability of another peritonitis episode by the same microorganism is similar in repeat and relapsing peritonitis.

Background: Post-renal acute kidney injury (PR–AKI) is frequent in patients with cancer requiring emergent intervention. With our study we aimed to describe the clinical features and prognostic factors for kidney and overall survival (OS) in cancer patients with PR–AKI. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study that included 306 cancer patients with PR–AKI admitted from January 2011 to December 2021. Previous kidney function, AKI episode, and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) were compared. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional regression methods were used for survival analyses. Results: The most frequent type of malignancy was the prostate (52, 17%) followed by the uterus (50, 16.3%). The mean baseline eGFR was 62 ml/min/1.73 m². AKI stage 3 was present in 157 patients (51.3%) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) was performed in 19 patients (6%). At discharge, 197 patients (64.4%) had a quick recovery, and during follow-up 8 (2.6%) patients progressed to ESKD. The risk factors associated with ESKD were previous decreased kidney function (eGFR<30 ml min 1.73m²) (HR 33.275, [95% CI, 3.997–277.002], p = 0.001); glomerular disease, (HR 8.353, [95%CI, 1.022–68.279], p=0.048); concomitant prerenal AKI (HR 5.670, [95% CI, 1.143–28.131], p = 0.034); and need of RRT (HR 19.519, [95% CI, 4.871–78.215], p < 0.001). Median OS was 6 months (IQR 1–24 months). We found differences in the global survival over 60 months, with longtime survivors including patients with Bricker (42.6% vs16.4%) and genito-urinary cancer (27.6% vs 11.7%). Gastric cancer (HR 2.943, [95%CI, 1.837–4.714], p<0.001), metastatic disease (HR 1.913, [95%CI, 1.464–2.499], p < 0.001), and direct tumoral invasion (HR 1.519, [95%CI, 1.115–2.070], p = 0.008) were related with a decreased survival. Conclusions: Gastric cancer, metastatic disease, and direct tumoral invasion were predictors of short survival. The main predictors of evolution to ESKD were previous kidney function, concomitant glomerular disease, and the need for RT.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis is an uncommon but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis. In most cases, the symptoms appear after peritoneal dialysis withdrawal, which hampers its diagnosis. We present the case of a 44-years-old Caucasian male who had been on peritoneal dialysis for 6 years and 3 months and was switched to hemodialysis due to ultrafiltration failure. During his last months on peritoneal dialysis, he developed anorexia and asthenia, which were initially attributed to dialysis inadequacy. After hemodialysis induction, the patient developed abdominal pain, increased abdominal volume, obstipation alternating with diarrhea, and weight loss. Computed tomography showed de novo ascites. A diagnosis of early encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis was considered, and treatment was promptly initiated with nutritional support, oral prednisolone, and tamoxifen for one year. The patient progressed with resolution of the symptoms. One month after the end of the treatment, he underwent a successful kidney transplant and remain without any major intercurrences. A high level of clinical suspicion is crucial for the early diagnosis of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis as the disease can be fatal in advanced stages. This case highlights that with early treatment, kidney transplantation can be successfully performed after an episode of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected millions worldwide, and in particular the care of patients on maintenance hemodialysis. These patients are thought to be at high risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection due to their older age and multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study was to compare hemodialysis and non-dialysis COVID-19 patients and find possible risk factors for mortality in hemodialysis patients. We developed a single-center retrospective cohort study, from March 1st to December 31st, 2020, that included maintenance hemodialysis patients hospitalized with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and age and sex propensity matched non-dialysis patients also hospitalized with a laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (1:1). A total of 34 hemodialysis patients were included, 70.6% male, mean age 76.5 years and on maintenance hemodialysis for 3.0 [0.5-23] years. At admission, 50.0% needed oxygen supply. Median hospital stay duration was 11.0 [5.8-17.0] days, and 38.2% developed bacterial superinfection. Maintenance hemodialysis patient mortality rate was 32.4%. When matched to the non-dialysis group, the hemodialysis group developed more often respiratory insufficiency (50.0% vs 8.8%, p<0.001) and had higher ferritin (1658.0 vs 623.5, p=0.004) and troponin T (130.0 vs 31.0, p<0.001) levels, whereas the non-dialysis group had higher transaminases levels. There was no statistical difference regarding hospitalization time, bacterial superinfection, or mortality between groups. When the logistic regression was performed, only bacterial superinfection was a predictor for mortality in hemodialysis COVID-19 patients (0.01 [0.00-0.26]). There was no difference in hospital stay nor in death rate between hemodialysis and non-dialysis COVID-19 patients. Despite these results, we must emphasize that mortality in the dialysis group was particularly high, with up to 32% of in-hospital mortality, and that bacterial superinfection has been shown to be an independent predictor of mortality. These results highlight the importance of interventions, such as full vaccination coverage, to mitigate the burden of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients.