The thickness of the tibial polyethylene (PE) insert is a critical parameter to ensure optimal soft-tissue balancing in the intraoperative decision-making procedure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of information about the kinetic response to PE insert thickness variations in the tibiofemoral (TF) joint, and subsequently, the secondary effects on the patellofemoral (PF) biomechanics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of varying PE insert thickness on the ligament and TF compressive forces, as well as on the PF forces and kinematics, after a cruciate-retaining TKA. A previous patient-specific musculoskeletal model of TKA was adapted to simulate a chair-rising motion in which PE insert thickness was varied with 2 mm increments or decrements compared to the reference case (9 mm), from 5 mm up to 13 mm. Greater PE insert thickness resulted in higher ligament forces and concurrently increased the TF compressive force by 21% (13 mm), but slightly unloaded the PF joint with 7% (13 mm) while shifting the patella distally in the trochlear groove, compared to the reference case. Thinner PE inserts showed an opposite trend. Our findings suggest that the optimal PE insert thickness selection is a trade-off between the kinetic outcomes of the TF and PF joints.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty can attain highly accurate implantation. However, the target for optimal positioning of the components remains debatable. One of the proposed targets is to recreate the functional status of the pre-diseased knee. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of reproducing the pre-diseased kinematics and strains of the ligaments and, subsequently, use that information to optimize the position of the femoral and tibial components. For this purpose, we segmented the pre-operative computed tomography of one patient with knee osteoarthritis using an image-based statistical shape model and built a patient-specific musculoskeletal model of the pre-diseased knee. This model was initially implanted with a cruciate-retaining total knee system according to mechanical alignment principles; and an optimization algorithm was then configured seeking the optimal position of the components that minimized the root-mean-square deviation between the pre-diseased and post-operative kinematics and/or ligament strains. With concurrent optimization for kinematics and ligament strains, we managed to reduce the deviations from 2.4 ± 1.4 mm (translations) and 2.7 ± 0.7° (rotations) with mechanical alignment to 1.1 ± 0.5 mm and 1.1 ± 0.6°, and the strains from 6.5% to lower than 3.2% over all the ligaments. These findings confirm that adjusting the implant position from the initial plan allows for a closer match with the pre-diseased biomechanical situation, which can be utilized to optimize the pre-planning of robotic-assisted surgery.

Aims: The surgical target for optimal implant positioning in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty remains the subject of ongoing discussion. One of the proposed targets is to recreate the knee’s functional behaviour as per its pre-diseased state. The aim of this study was to optimize implant positioning, starting from mechanical alignment (MA), toward restoring the pre-diseased status, including ligament strain and kinematic patterns, in a patient population.Methods: We used an active appearance model-based approach to segment the preoperative CT of 21 osteoarthritic patients, which identified the osteophyte-free surfaces and estimated cartilage from the segmented bones; these geometries were used to construct patient-specific musculoskeletal models of the pre-diseased knee. Subsequently, implantations were simulated using the MA method, and a previously developed optimization technique was employed to find the optimal implant position that minimized the root mean square deviation between pre-diseased and postoperative ligament strains and kinematics.Results: There were evident biomechanical differences between the simulated patient models, but also trends that appeared reproducible at the population level. Optimizing the implant position significantly reduced the maximum observed strain root mean square deviations within the cohort from 36.5% to below 5.3% for all but the anterolateral ligament; and concomitantly reduced the kinematic deviations from 3.8 mm (SD 1.7) and 4.7° (SD 1.9°) with MA to 2.7 mm (SD 1.4) and 3.7° (SD 1.9°) relative to the pre-diseased state. To achieve this, the femoral component consistently required translational adjustments in the anterior, lateral, and proximal directions, while the tibial component required a more posterior slope and varus rotation in most cases.Conclusion: These findings confirm that MA-induced biomechanical alterations relative to the pre-diseased state can be reduced by optimizing the implant position, and may have implications to further advance pre-planning in robotic-assisted surgery in order to restore pre-diseased knee function.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(11):1231–1239.

Osteophytes are routinely removed during total knee arthroplasty, yet the preoperative planning currently relies on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of the patient's osteoarthritic knee, typically including osteophytic features. This complicates the surgeon's ability to anticipate the exact biomechanical effects of osteophytes and the consequences of their removal before the operation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of osteophytes on ligament strains and kinematics, and ascertain whether the osteophyte volume and location determine the extent of this effect. We segmented preoperative CT scans of 21 patients, featuring different osteophyte severity, using image‐based active appearance models trained to identify the osteophytic and preosteophytic bone geometries and estimate the cartilage thickness in the segmented surfaces. The patients' morphologies were used to scale a template musculoskeletal knee model. Osteophytes induced clinically relevant changes to the knee's functional behavior, but these were variable and patient‐specific. Generally, severe osteophytic knees significantly strained the oblique popliteal ligament (OPL) and posterior capsule (PC) relative to the preosteophytic state. Furthermore, there was a marked effect on the lateral collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament (ALL) strains compared to mild and moderate osteophytic knees, and concurrent alterations in the tibial lateral‐medial translation and external–internal rotation. We found a strong correlation between the OPL, PC, and ALL strains and posterolateral condylar and tibial osteophytes, respectively. Our findings may have implications for the preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty, toward reproducing the physiological knee biomechanics as close as feasibly possible.

The main proposed targets for implant alignment in total knee arthroplasty include restoration of native knee kinematics and/or ligament strains. These two targets may be inherently interchangeable, yet the extent of their relationship remains to be determined. For a single osteoarthritic patient, we used a previously established workflow to generate a personalized musculoskeletal model of the native knee and, subsequently, an implanted model configuration according to mechanical alignment principles. In the mechanically aligned model, the rotational alignment of the components was systematically varied within ± 4° relative to mechanical alignment position in 2° increments/decrements, resulting in a total of 5⁶(15,625) simulated positions. Of these, 1,103 positions more closely reproduced native kinematics compared with mechanical alignment, and 84% of these also resulted in ligament strains closer to the native state. About three-times more positions (3,294) were favourable when considering ligament strains, but only 28% of these also resulted in improved kinematics. There was a moderate positive correlation between the two targets (Pearson's r=0.607, R²=0.369), suggesting they are related but not completely interchangeable. Although targeting restoration of native knee kinematics is generally expected to facilitate restoration of ligament strains, and vice versa, both objectives should be considered within a unified objective function to better achieve reconstruction of native biomechanical conditions after total knee arthroplasty.