Riccardo Giorgino

Dr. Riccardo Giorgino

Orthopedic Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Riccardo GiorginoRiccardo Giorgino
Riccardo Giorgino
Domenico AlbanoDomenico Albano
Domenico Albano
SFStefano Fusco
Stefano Fusco
GPGiuseppe Michele Peretti
Giuseppe Michele Peretti
LMLaura Mangiavini
Laura Mangiavini
CMCarmelo Messina
Carmelo Messina
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease and the most common orthopedic disorder. A vast majority of the social OA burden is related to hips and knees. The prevalence of knee OA varied across studies and such differences are reflected by the heterogeneity of data reported by studies conducted worldwide. A complete understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this pathology is essential. The OA inflammatory process starts in the synovial membrane with the activation of the immune system, involving both humoral and cellular mediators. A crucial role in this process is played by the so-called “damage-associated molecular patterns” (DAMPs). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be a promising option among all possible therapeutic options. However, many issues are still debated, such as the best cell source, their nature, and the right amount. Further studies are needed to clarify the remaining doubts. This review provides an overview of the most recent and relevant data on the molecular mechanism of cartilage damage in knee OA, including current therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine.

17 October 2021 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Filippo MiglioriniFilippo Migliorini
Filippo Migliorini
Riccardo GiorginoRiccardo Giorgino
Riccardo Giorgino
FHFrank Hildebrand
Frank Hildebrand
Filippo SPIEZIAFilippo SPIEZIA
Filippo SPIEZIA
GPGiuseppe Michele Peretti
Giuseppe Michele Peretti
Nicola MaffulliNicola Maffulli
Nicola Maffulli
Given the progressive ageing of Western populations, the fragility fractures market has a growing socioeconomic impact. Fragility fractures are common in the elderly, negatively impacting their quality of life, limiting autonomy, increasing disability, and decreasing life expectancy. Different causes contribute to the development of a fractures in frail individuals. Among all, targeting fragile patients before the development of a fracture may represent the greatest challenge, and current diagnostic tools suffer from limitations. This study summarizes the current evidence on the management of fragility fractures, discussing risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, and actual limitations of the clinical therapeutic options, putting forward new ideas for further scientific investigation.

18 May 2021 in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Filippo MiglioriniFilippo Migliorini
Filippo Migliorini
NMNicola Maffulli
Nicola Maffulli
FSFilippo Spiezia
Filippo Spiezia
MTMarkus Tingart
Markus Tingart
PMPeretti Giuseppe Maria
Peretti Giuseppe Maria
Riccardo GiorginoRiccardo Giorgino
Riccardo Giorgino
Background: Biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTMs), such as bone alkaline phosphatase (bALP), procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), serum cross-linked C-telopeptides of type I collagen (bCTx), and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx), are commonly used for therapy monitoring purposes for osteoporotic patients. The present study evaluated the potential role of BTMs as therapy monitoring. Methods: All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing two or more pharmacological treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis were accessed. Only studies that reported the value of bALP, PINP, bCTx, and NTx at last follow-up were included. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess associations between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes and rate of adverse events in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A multiple linear model regression analysis through the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used. Results: A total of 16 RCTs (14,446 patients) were included. The median age was 67 years, and the median BMI 25.4 kg/m2. The median vertebral BMD was 0.82, hip BMD 0.79, and femur BMD 0.64 g/cm2. The ANOVA test found optimal within-group variance concerning mean age, body mass index, and BMD. Greater bALP was associated with lower femoral BMD (P = 0.01). Greater NTx was associated with a greater number of non-vertebral fractures (P = 0.02). Greater NTx was associated with greater rate of therapy discontinuation (P = 0.04). No other statistically significant associations were detected. Conclusion: Our analysis supports the adoption of BTMs in therapy monitoring of osteoporotic patients. Level of evidence: Level I, systematic review of RCTs.

31 May 2021 in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Filippo MiglioriniFilippo Migliorini
Filippo Migliorini
NMNicola Maffulli
Nicola Maffulli
FSFilippo Spiezia
Filippo Spiezia
GPGiuseppe Maria Peretti
Giuseppe Maria Peretti
MTMarkus Tingart
Markus Tingart
Riccardo GiorginoRiccardo Giorgino
Riccardo Giorgino
Background: Biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTMs), such as the bone alkaline phosphatase (bALP), procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), serum cross-linked C-telopeptides of type I collagen (bCTx), and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx), are used to manage therapy monitoring in osteoporotic patients. This systematic review analyzed the potential of these BMTs in predicting the clinical outcomes in terms of BMD, t-score, rate of fractures, and adverse events during the therapy setting in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods: All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting data on biomarkers for postmenopausal osteoporosis were accessed. Only articles reporting quantitative data on the level of biomarkers at baseline and on the outcomes of interest at the last follow-up were eligible. Results: A total of 36,706 patients were retrieved. Greater values of bALP were associated with a greater rate of vertebral (P = 0.001) and non-vertebral fractures (P = 0.0001). Greater values of NTx at baseline were associated with a greater rate of adverse events at the last follow-up (P = 0.02). Greater values of CTx at baseline were associated with a greater rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation (P = 0.04), gastrointestinal adverse events (P = 0.0001), musculoskeletal adverse events (P = 0.04), and mortality (P = 0.04). Greater values of PINP at baseline were associated with greater rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (P = 0.02) at the last follow-up. Conclusion: The present analysis supports the adoption of BMTs during pharmacological therapy setting of patients suffering from osteoporosis. Level of evidence: I, systematic review of RCTs

1 November 2023 in Frontiers in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Riccardo GiorginoRiccardo Giorgino
Riccardo Giorgino
MAMario Alessandri-Bonetti
Mario Alessandri-Bonetti
ALAndrea Luca
Andrea Luca
FMFilippo Migliorini
Filippo Migliorini
NRNicolò Rossi
Nicolò Rossi
LMLaura Mangiavini
Laura Mangiavini
The field of orthopedics faces complex challenges requiring quick and intricate decisions, with patient education and compliance playing crucial roles in treatment outcomes. Technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) can potentially enhance orthopedic care. ChatGPT, a natural language processing technology developed by OpenAI, has shown promise in various sectors, including healthcare. ChatGPT can facilitate patient information exchange in orthopedics, provide clinical decision support, and improve patient communication and education. It can assist in differential diagnosis, suggest appropriate imaging modalities, and optimize treatment plans based on evidence-based guidelines. However, ChatGPT has limitations, such as insufficient expertise in specialized domains and a lack of contextual understanding. The application of ChatGPT in orthopedics is still evolving, with studies exploring its potential in clinical decision-making, patient education, workflow optimization, and scientific literature. The results indicate both the benefits and limitations of ChatGPT, emphasizing the need for caution, ethical considerations, and human oversight. Addressing training data quality, biases, data privacy, and accountability challenges is crucial for responsible implementation. While ChatGPT has the potential to transform orthopedic healthcare, further research and development are necessary to ensure its reliability, accuracy, and ethical use in patient care.

23 July 2022 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRiccardo D'Ambrosi
Riccardo D'Ambrosi
AMAmit Meena
Amit Meena
ARAkshya Raj
Akshya Raj
Riccardo GiorginoRiccardo Giorgino
Riccardo Giorgino
NUNicola Ursino
Nicola Ursino
JKJon Karlsson
Jon Karlsson
Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes, complications, and rate of return to sports among patients with RAMP lesion of the medial meniscus encountered during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using the terms “ACL” or “anterior cruciate ligament,” and “RAMP lesion.” The outcome measures extracted from the studies were the Short Form‐12 (SF‐12) in its mental and physical component (MCS and PCS), Lysholm score, Subjective IKDC, Marx Score, WOMAC Score, Tegner, Radiological changes, complications, failures and/or revision surgery, and rate of return to sports.Results: The cohort of patients consisted of 1,243 participants with a mean age of 28.6 ± 2.6. The mean postoperative follow‐up was 40.9 ± 6.3 months. A total of 1145 (92.1%) RAMP lesions were repaired with concomitant ACL reconstruction, while only 98 (7.9%) lesions were left untreated (or treated with abrasion only). The Lysholm score was used in 6 studies (in one only at final follow‐up), with a significant improvement in all the studies (Lysholmpre 60.03 ± 6.12; Lysholmpost 89.9 ± 5.0). Eight studies out of nine reported Subjective IKDC score, and a significant improvement was noted in all cases (IKDCpre 56.2 ± 5.8. IKDCpost 84.9 ± 3.7). Of 18 (1.4%) complications reported, 15 (1.2%) were related to RAMP/ACL surgery, and of the remaining three (0.2%) two (0.2%) were hematomas and one (0.1%) a contralateral ACL lesion. Of the 106 (8.5%) revision surgeries required, 5 (0.4%) were in non‐treated lesions [two (0.2%) ACL re‐ruptures and three (0.2%) medial meniscus re‐injury]. In treated patients, the revision occurred for the following reasons: 75 (6.0%) meniscectomy, 14 (1.1%) meniscal suture revisions, 11 (0.9%) ACL failures and one (0.1%) arthrolysis.Conclusions: It is not yet clear if, in all cases of ACL reconstruction in which a medial meniscal RAMP lesion is encountered, the lesion needs to undergo surgical repair. Accordingly, it is recommended that in the repair of all unstable medial meniscal RAMP lesions during an ACL reconstruction in cases associated with a stable RAMP lesion, the surgeon may decide on repair based on the patient profile.Level of evidence: Level IV.