Ernst Jan de Place Hansen

Dr. Ernst Jan de Place Hansen

Aalborg University Copenhagen, Department of the Built Environment
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALESSIA BUDAALESSIA BUDA
ALESSIA BUDA
Ernst Jan de Place HansenErnst Jan de Place Hansen
Ernst Jan de Place Hansen
ARAlexander Rieser
Alexander Rieser
Emanuela GiancolaEmanuela Giancola
Emanuela Giancola
VPValeria Natalina Pracchi
Valeria Natalina Pracchi
Daniel Herrera-AvellanosaDaniel Herrera-Avellanosa
Daniel Herrera-Avellanosa
Historic, listed, or unlisted, buildings account for 30% of the European building stock. Since they are complex systems of cultural, architectural, and identity value, they need particular attention to ensure that they are preserved, used, and managed over time in a sustainable way. This implies a demand for retrofit solutions able to improve indoor thermal conditions while reducing the use of energy sources and preserving the heritage significance. Often, however, the choice and implementation of retrofit solutions in historic buildings is limited by socio-technical barriers (regulations, lack of knowledge on the hygrothermal behaviour of built heritage, economic viability, etc.). This paper presents the approach devised in the IEA-SHC Task 59 project (Renovating Historic Buildings Towards Zero Energy) to support decision makers in selecting retrofit solutions, in accordance with the provision of the EN 16883:2017 standard. In particular, the method followed by the project partners to gather and assess compatible solutions for historic buildings retrofitting is presented. It focuses on best practices for walls, windows, HVAC systems, and solar technologies. This work demonstrates that well-balanced retrofit solutions can exist and can be evaluated case-by-case through detailed assessment criteria. As a main result, the paper encourages decision makers to opt for tailored energy retrofit to solve the conflict between conservation and energy performance requirements.

30 July 2022 in Journal of Cultural Heritage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALESSIA BUDAALESSIA BUDA
ALESSIA BUDA
Virginia GoriVirginia Gori
Virginia Gori
Ernst Jan de Place HansenErnst Jan de Place Hansen
Ernst Jan de Place Hansen
CLCristina S. Polo López
Cristina S. Polo López
VMValentina Marincioni
Valentina Marincioni
Daniel Herrera-AvellanosaDaniel Herrera-Avellanosa
Daniel Herrera-Avellanosa

1 June 2020 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSVasilis Soulios
Vasilis Soulios
Ernst Jan de Place HansenErnst Jan de Place Hansen
Ernst Jan de Place Hansen
CFChi Feng
Chi Feng
HJHans Janssen
Hans Janssen

19 February 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMValentina Marincioni
Valentina Marincioni
Virginia GoriVirginia Gori
Virginia Gori
Ernst Jan de Place HansenErnst Jan de Place Hansen
Ernst Jan de Place Hansen
Daniel Herrera-AvellanosaDaniel Herrera-Avellanosa
Daniel Herrera-Avellanosa
SMSara Mauri
Sara Mauri
ARAlexander Rieser
Alexander Rieser
Buildings of heritage significance due to their historical, architectural, or cultural value, here called historic buildings, constitute a large proportion of the building stock in many countries around the world. Improving the performance of such buildings is necessary to lower the carbon emissions of the stock, which generates around 40% of the overall emissions worldwide. In historic buildings, it is estimated that heat loss through external walls contributes significantly to the overall energy consumption, and is associated with poor thermal comfort and indoor air quality. Measures to improve the performance of walls of historic buildings require a balance between energy performance, indoor environmental quality, heritage significance, and technical compatibility. Appropriate wall measures are available, but the correct selection and implementation require an integrated process throughout assessment (planning), design, construction, and use. Despite the available knowledge, decision-makers often have limited access to robust information on tested retrofit measures, hindering the implementation of deep renovation. This paper provides an evidence-based approach on the steps required during assessment, design, and construction, and after retrofitting through a literature review. Moreover, it provides a review of possible measures for wall retrofit within the deep renovation of historic buildings, including their advantages and disadvantages and the required considerations based on context.

1 November 2003 in Materials and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBB. I. G. Barr
B. I. G. Barr
MLM. K. Lee
M. K. Lee
Ernst Jan de Place HansenErnst Jan de Place Hansen
Ernst Jan de Place Hansen
DDD. Dupont
D. Dupont
EEE. Erdem
E. Erdem
LVL. Vandewalle
L. Vandewalle

1 August 2021 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VSVasilis Soulios
Vasilis Soulios
Ernst Jan de Place HansenErnst Jan de Place Hansen
Ernst Jan de Place Hansen
RPRuut Peuhkuri
Ruut Peuhkuri
EMEva Møller
Eva Møller
AGAfshin Ghanbari-Siahkali
Afshin Ghanbari-Siahkali