Gerco Den Hartog

Dr. Gerco Den Hartog

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Center for Infectious Disease Control
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 May 2021 in Science Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDaryl Geers
Daryl Geers
MSMarc C. Shamier
Marc C. Shamier
SBSusanne Bogers
Susanne Bogers
Gerco Den HartogGerco Den Hartog
Gerco Den Hartog
LGLennert Gommers
Lennert Gommers
Corine Geurts KesselCorine Geurts Kessel
Corine Geurts Kessel
Infection- or vaccination-induced SARS-CoV-2 S–specific CD4 + T cells are indifferent to the S mutations of variants of concern.

1 May 2017 in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LBLindsay D. Butcher
Lindsay D. Butcher
Gerco Den HartogGerco Den Hartog
Gerco Den Hartog
PEPeter B. Ernst
Peter B. Ernst
SCSheila E. Crowe
Sheila E. Crowe
Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative, microaerophilic bacterium that infects the stomach and can lead to, among other disorders, the development of gastric cancer. The inability of the host to clear the infection results in a chronic inflammatory state with continued oxidative stress within the tissue. Reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species produced by the immune and epithelial cells damage the host cells and can result in DNA damage. H pylori has evolved to evoke this damaging response while blunting the host's efforts to kill the bacteria. This long-lasting state with inflammation and oxidative stress can result in gastric carcinogenesis. Continued efforts to better understand the bacterium and the host response will serve to prevent or provide improved early diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.

8 August 2020 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gerco Den HartogGerco Den Hartog
Gerco Den Hartog
RSRutger M Schepp
Rutger M Schepp
MKMarjan Kuijer
Marjan Kuijer
CGCorine GeurtsvanKessel
Corine GeurtsvanKessel
JBJosine van Beek
Josine van Beek
RBRobert S van Binnendijk
Robert S van Binnendijk
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates better understanding of the kinetics of antibody production induced by infection with SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to develop a high-throughput multiplex assay to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 to assess immunity to the virus in the general population. Methods: Spike protein subunits S1 and receptor binding domain, and nucleoprotein were coupled to microspheres. Sera collected before emergence of SARS-CoV-2 (n = 224) and of non-SARS-CoV-2 influenza-like illness (n = 184), and laboratory-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 115) with various severities of COVID-19 were tested for SARS-CoV-2–specific IgG concentrations. Results: Our assay discriminated SARS-CoV-2–induced antibodies and those induced by other viruses. The assay specificity was 95.1%–99.0% with sensitivity 83.6%–95.7%. By merging the test results for all 3 antigens a specificity of 100% was achieved with a sensitivity of at least 90%. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients developed higher IgG concentrations and the rate of IgG production increased faster compared to nonhospitalized cases. Conclusions: The bead-based serological assay for quantitation of SARS-CoV-2–specific antibodies proved to be robust and can be conducted in many laboratories. We demonstrated that testing of antibodies against multiple antigens increases sensitivity and specificity compared to single-antigen–specific IgG determination.

1 December 2010 in Developmental & Comparative Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
A (Aart) LammersA (Aart) Lammers
A (Aart) Lammers
WWWillemien H. Wieland
Willemien H. Wieland
LKLeo Kruijt
Leo Kruijt
AJArne Jansma
Arne Jansma
TSTrudy Straetemans
Trudy Straetemans
HPHenk K. Parmentier
Henk K. Parmentier

28 November 2020 in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRegnerus A. Vos
Regnerus A. Vos
Gerco Den HartogGerco Den Hartog
Gerco Den Hartog
RSRutger M Schepp
Rutger M Schepp
PKPatricia Kaaijk
Patricia Kaaijk
JVJeffrey van Vliet
Jeffrey van Vliet
FKFiona R M van der Klis
Fiona R M van der Klis
Background We aimed to detect SARS-CoV-2 serum antibodies in the general population of the Netherlands and identify risk factors for seropositivity amidst the first COVID-19 epidemic wave. Methods Participants (n=3207, aged 2–90 years), enrolled from a previously established nationwide serosurveillance study, provided a self-collected fingerstick blood sample and completed a questionnaire (median inclusion date 3 April 2020). IgG antibodies targeted against the spike S1-protein of SARS-CoV-2 were quantified using a validated multiplex-immunoassay. Seroprevalence was estimated controlling for survey design, individual pre-pandemic concentration, and test performance. Random-effects logistic regression identified risk factors for seropositivity. Results Overall seroprevalence in the Netherlands was 2.8% (95% CI 2.1 to 3.7), with no differences between sexes or ethnic background, and regionally ranging between 1.3 and 4.0%. Estimates were highest among 18–39 year-olds (4.9%), and lowest in children 2–17 years (1.7%). Multivariable analysis revealed that persons taking immunosuppressants and those from the Orthodox-Reformed Protestant community had over four times higher odds of being seropositive compared to others. Anosmia/ageusia was the most discriminative symptom between seropositive (53%) and seronegative persons (4%, p<0.0001). Antibody concentrations in seropositive persons were significantly higher in those with fever or dyspnoea in contrast to those without (p=0.01 and p=0.04, respectively). Conclusions In the midst of the first epidemic wave, 2.8% of the Dutch population was estimated to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, that is, 30 times higher than reported. This study identified independent groups with increased odds for seropositivity that may require specific surveillance measures to guide future protective interventions internationally, including vaccination once available.

24 February 2021 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gerco Den HartogGerco Den Hartog
Gerco Den Hartog
EVEric R A Vos
Eric R A Vos
LHLotus L van Den Hoogen
Lotus L van Den Hoogen
MBMichiel van Boven
Michiel van Boven
RSRutger M Schepp
Rutger M Schepp
RBRobert S van Binnendijk
Robert S van Binnendijk
Assessing the duration of immunity following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a first priority to gauge the degree of protection following infection. Such knowledge is lacking, especially in the general population. Here, we studied changes in immunoglobulin isotype seropositivity and immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding strength of SARS-CoV-2–specific serum antibodies up to 7 months following onset of symptoms in a nationwide sample. Participants from a prospective representative serological study in the Netherlands were included based on IgG seroconversion to the spike S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 (N = 353), with up to 3 consecutive serum samples per seroconverted participant (N = 738). Immunoglobulin M (IgM), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and IgG antibody concentrations to S1, and increase in IgG avidity in relation to time since onset of disease symptoms, were determined. While SARS-CoV-2–specific IgM and IgA antibodies declined rapidly after the first month after disease onset, specific IgG was still present in 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%–95%) of the participants after 7 months. The estimated 2-fold decrease of IgG antibodies was 158 days (95% CI, 136–189 days). Concentrations were sustained better in persons reporting significant symptoms compared to asymptomatic persons or those with mild upper respiratory complaints only. Similarly, avidity of IgG antibodies for symptomatic persons showed a steeper increase over time compared with persons with mild or no symptoms (P = .022). SARS-CoV-2–specific IgG antibodies persist and show increasing avidity over time, indicative of underlying immune maturation. These data support development of immune memory against SARS-CoV-2, providing insight into protection of the general unvaccinated part of the population. NL8473 (the Dutch trial registry).