Jose Bauermeister

Dr. Jose Bauermeister

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJennifer E. F. Teitcher
Jennifer E. F. Teitcher
WBWalter O. Bockting
Walter O. Bockting
JBJose Bauermeister
Jose Bauermeister
CHChris J. Hoefer
Chris J. Hoefer
MMMichael H. Miner
Michael H. Miner
RKRobert L. Klitzman
Robert L. Klitzman

28 January 2015 in Current HIV/AIDS Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKathryn E. Muessig
Kathryn E. Muessig
MNManali Nekkanti
Manali Nekkanti
JBJose Bauermeister
Jose Bauermeister
SBSheana Bull
Sheana Bull
LHLisa Hightow-Weidman
Lisa Hightow-Weidman

22 April 2014 in The Journal of Sex Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGChristian Grov
Christian Grov
ABAaron S. Breslow
Aaron S. Breslow
MNMichael E. Newcomb
Michael E. Newcomb
JRJoshua G. Rosenberger
Joshua G. Rosenberger
JBJose Bauermeister
Jose Bauermeister
We document the historical and cultural shifts in how gay and bisexual men have used the Internet for sexuality between the 1990s and 2013—including shifting technology as well as research methods to study gay and bisexual men online. Gay and bisexual men have rapidly taken to using the Internet for sexual purposes: for health information seeking, finding sex partners, dating, cybersex, and pornography. Men have adapted to the ever-evolving technological advances that have been made in connecting users to the Internet—from logging on via dial-up modem on a desktop computer to geo-social-sexual networking via handheld devices. In kind, researchers have adapted to the Internet to study gay and bisexual men. Studies have carefully considered the ethics, feasibility, and acceptability of using the Internet to conduct research and interventions. Much of this work has been grounded in models of disease prevention, largely as a result of the ongoing HIV/AIDS epidemic. The need to reduce HIV in this population has been a driving force to develop innovative research and Internet-based intervention methodologies. The Internet, and specifically mobile technology, is an environment gay and bisexual men are using for sexual purposes. These innovative technologies represent powerful resources for researchers to study and provide outreach.

1 March 2013 in Journal of Adolescent Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDeborah Gordon-Messer
Deborah Gordon-Messer
JBJose Bauermeister
Jose Bauermeister
AGAlison Grodzinski
Alison Grodzinski
MZMarc Zimmerman
Marc Zimmerman

1 August 2015 in AIDS Patient Care and STDs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LELisa A. Eaton
Lisa A. Eaton
DDDaniel D. Driffin
Daniel D. Driffin
JBJose Bauermeister
Jose Bauermeister
HSHarlan Smith
Harlan Smith
CCChristopher Conway-Washington
Christopher Conway-Washington
In the United States, rates of HIV infection are highest among black men who have sex with men (BMSM). Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective form of HIV prevention, but the uptake of this strategy has been slow since FDA approval in 2012, and it is unknown whether information about PrEP is reaching BMSM. Four hundred and thirty-six BMSM in Atlanta, GA were surveyed from January 2012 (6 months prior to PrEP approval) to March 2014 (20 months after approval). Analyses revealed no association between date of survey assessment and awareness of PrEP (20.5% were aware of PrEP before approval and 23.4% were aware after approval; OR=0.99 [0.98-1.02], p=0.952). In a multivariate model, BMSM unaware of PrEP reported lower rates of HIV testing knowledge, fewer experiences with HIV testing, and higher rates of transactional sex than BMSM who were aware of PrEP. Our findings suggest that there is limited understanding of PrEP and that there is considerable groundwork that needs to be achieved in order to reap the full benefits of PrEP. The current findings call attention to the need to both prioritize and better understand how to strengthen the bridge between medical advances and community uptake.

31 March 2014 in Current HIV Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJose Bauermeister
Jose Bauermeister
SMSteven Meanley
Steven Meanley
EPEmily Pingel
Emily Pingel
JSJorge Soler
Jorge Soler
GHGary Harper
Gary Harper
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to help reduce new HIV infections among young men who have sex with men (YMSM). Using a cross-sectional survey of YMSM (N=1,507; ages 18-24), we gauged YMSM’s PrEP awareness and PrEP-related beliefs regarding side effects, accessibility, and affordability. Overall, 27% of the sample had heard about PrEP; 1% reported ever using PrEP prior to sex. In a multivariate logistic regression, we found that YMSM were more likely to have heard about PrEP if they were older, more educated, were residentially unstable in the prior 30 days, had insurance, or reported having at least one sexually transmitted infection in their lifetime. We found no differences by race/ethnicity, history of incarceration, or recent sexual risk behavior. In multivariate linear regression models, Black and Latino YMSM were more likely than Whites to state they would not use PrEP because of side effect concerns. YMSM were more likely to indicate that they would not be able to afford PrEP if they did not have insurance or if they had a prior sexually transmitted infection, PrEP rollout may be hindered due to lack of awareness, as well as perceived barriers regarding its use. We propose strategies to maximize equity in PrEP awareness and access if it is to be scaled up among YMSM.