Carmen Delgado-Álvarez

Ms. Carmen Delgado-Álvarez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 May 2021 in Journal of Family Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMarie-Carmen Neipp
Marie-Carmen Neipp
Mark BeyebachMark Beyebach
Mark Beyebach
Andrés Sánchez-PradaAndrés Sánchez-Prada
Andrés Sánchez-Prada
CDCarmen Delgado-Álvarez
Carmen Delgado-Álvarez
The differential impact of solution‐focused brief therapy questions was tested. A total of 246 subjects described a personal problem they wanted to solve and were randomly assigned to one of four interventions that involved answering problem‐focused versus solution‐focused questions: a problem‐focused condition, a miracle condition, a scaling condition or an exception condition. Before and after answering the questions, participants completed measures of positive and negative affect, self‐efficacy, goal attainment, action steps and solution‐focused thinking. The miracle and exception conditions were more effective than the problem‐focused condition in reducing negative affect. The scaling condition generated more action steps than the miracle question or the exception question. These findings support solution‐focused ideas on the different effects of solution‐focused questions, but also suggest that solution‐focused and problem‐focused questions might be more similar than different in their immediate impact on clients.Practitioner points: Solution‐focused and problem‐focused questions are more similar than different in their immediate impact on clients. Among solution‐focused questions, the miracle question and the exception question are more effective in reducing negative affect, and scaling questions in generating specific action steps. Integrative therapists could use solution‐focused questions not only with clients who seem more optimistic but also with less solution‐minded ones. ​

1 December 2014 in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CDCarmen Delgado-Álvarez
Carmen Delgado-Álvarez
Gender violence in couples, as a specific form of violence against women, is different from symmetrical violence or mutual combat in that it is aimed at maintaining asymmetric power relations based on gender. Self-informant scales for assessing aggression within dating couples are inadequate for evaluating its motives, context, and effects on the relationship. This paper analyses critical issues concerning the validity of dating violence scales. The VGP scale is proposed to assess to what degree psychologically abusive behaviour is perceived as violence

26 July 2018 in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrés Sánchez-PradaAndrés Sánchez-Prada
Andrés Sánchez-Prada
CDCarmen Delgado-Álvarez
Carmen Delgado-Álvarez
EBEsperanza Bosch-Fiol
Esperanza Bosch-Fiol
Victoria Ferrer-PerezVictoria Ferrer-Perez
Victoria Ferrer-Perez
There is consistent evidence that attitudes are important in understanding how people react and behave toward victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women. Researchers have typically measured these attitudes through self-reports. However, explicit measures are prone to socially desirable responding. The overall objective of our research is to provide multimethod measures of public attitudes (explicit and implicit) toward intimate partner violence against women. An opportunity sample of 190 Psychology undergraduates (32 men and 158 women) took part in this study and completed two self-reports: the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts about Women and Violence, and the Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating. In addition, they completed a personalized Implicit Association Test, the Gender Violence Implicit Association Test. This study provides evidence of the best way to apply the Gender Violence Implicit Association Test (with feedback) and the best procedure for estimating the Implicit Association Test effect (built-in error penalty). The findings are also consistent with previous research and exhibit a significant disparity between explicit and implicit measures of attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women. These findings, although still preliminary, provide interesting information that affirms the need to incorporate implicit measures of attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women into research on this social problem.

1 November 2015 in Psicothema
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDCarmen Delgado-Álvarez
Carmen Delgado-Álvarez
BABenito Estrada Aranda
Benito Estrada Aranda
JHJosé López Huerto
José López Huerto
Studies reporting similar figures of couple (man-woman) violence and works questioning the validity of the instruments employed have generated controversy about the conceptualization of this construct. One of the critical issues is the different ways of perceiving violence between men and women, as well as its nature in the cultural context. This may affect self-reported answers. A questionnaire evaluating the degree of violence perceived in ten kinds of psychological partner abuse was applied. 1750 students from Spain and Mexico, all of them randomly selected, completed it. Through MANOVA, greater perception of violence in the Spanish sample than in the Mexican one was obtained; in both countries, there was a greater perception in women than in men. Effects of gender-culture interaction were obtained in four dimensions: Isolation, Sexual Pressure, Emotional Manipulation, and Dominance. Multidimensional scaling showed two perceived dimensions: (1) "Proactive-Passive Tactics", stronger in the Spanish culture and (2) "Punitive-Emotional Tactics", stronger in the Mexican culture. These results confirm gender-culture effects in perception of psychological violence in the partner.

Victoria Ferrer-PerezVictoria Ferrer-Perez
Victoria Ferrer-Perez
CDCarmen Delgado-Álvarez
Carmen Delgado-Álvarez
Andrés Sánchez-PradaAndrés Sánchez-Prada
Andrés Sánchez-Prada
EFEsperanza Bosch Fiol
Esperanza Bosch Fiol
VFVirginia Ferreiro-Basurto
Virginia Ferreiro-Basurto
Violence against women (VAW) is gender-based violence directed at women and girls on account of being female that can take on multiple forms and manifest in different contexts. Among the many possible forms of VAW, this article focuses on “piropos”, a type of stranger harassment situation. Specifically, the objectives of this study were two-fold: to analyze the usefulness of a tool to evaluate social attitudes towards this form of VAW and to analyze the influence of sociodemographic variables and prior victimization (whether as a witness or victim) on attitudes towards this type of violence among Spanish youth. An opportunity sample of 538 young Spanish people took part in this study. They filled out a sociodemographic data sheet, a victimization questionnaire designed ad hoc, and a questionnaire on attitudes towards “piropos”. The results obtained indicate that the questionnaire was adequate for use as a tool to evaluate social attitudes towards this type of VAW and suggest its applicability for future studies on attitudes towards “piropos” as a type of stranger harassment situation in a Spanish context. Moreover, the results on victimization not only corroborate the magnitude of street sexual harassment in Spain and a direct effect of gender on the perception of the violence experienced, they also reinforce the need to further investigate new aspects. Regarding attitudes towards “piropos”, the results obtained indicate that, in general, participants demonstrated negative attitudes or rejection, and these feelings were particularly strong among women.

Andrés Sánchez-PradaAndrés Sánchez-Prada
Andrés Sánchez-Prada
CDCarmen Delgado-Álvarez
Carmen Delgado-Álvarez
EFEsperanza Bosch Fiol
Esperanza Bosch Fiol
VFVirginia Ferreiro-Basurto
Virginia Ferreiro-Basurto
Victoria Ferrer-PerezVictoria Ferrer-Perez
Victoria Ferrer-Perez
Supportive attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) normalize and promote these aggressive behaviors. As a result, more and more research is proposing the identification, analysis and intervention of these attitudes. However, the vast majority of this research focuses on students. The main objective of this paper is to analyze these supportive attitudes throughout the lifecycle. An opportunity sample of 200 Spanish participants, by age and sex fixed quotas, took part in this study. Attitudes were measured using the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts about Women and Violence, the Inventory of Beliefs about Intimate Partner Violence and the Gender Violence Implicit Association Test, a personalized form of Implicit Association Test (IAT). The results show that explicitly measured supportive attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women differ between age groups, adopting a U-shape distribution: lower acceptance among middle-aged-adults and young-adults and higher acceptance among adolescents and older adults. However, when these attitudes were implicitly measured, the IPVAW rejection increased with age, which is a counter-intuitive result and inconsistent with previous theoretical evidence. In summary, these results support an age effect that differs according to the measure of attitudes used and highlight some difficulties related to based-on-reaction-time measures among older people. This suggests the need for further research on the topic, especially among the older population.