Vladimir Bajic

Prof. Vladimir Bajic


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 September 2005 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Piero CarninciPiero Carninci
Piero Carninci
TKT. Kasukawa
T. Kasukawa
SKS. Katayama
S. Katayama
JGJ. Gough
J. Gough
MFM. C. Frith
M. C. Frith
YHY. Hayashizaki
Y. Hayashizaki
This study describes comprehensive polling of transcription start and termination sites and analysis of previously unidentified full-length complementary DNAs derived from the mouse genome. We identify the 5′ and 3′ boundaries of 181,047 transcripts with extensive variation in transcripts arising from alternative promoter usage, splicing, and polyadenylation. There are 16,247 new mouse protein-coding transcripts, including 5154 encoding previously unidentified proteins. Genomic mapping of the transcriptome reveals transcriptional forests, with overlapping transcription on both strands, separated by deserts in which few transcripts are observed. The data provide a comprehensive platform for the comparative analysis of mammalian transcriptional regulation in differentiation and development.

28 April 2006 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Piero CarninciPiero Carninci
Piero Carninci
ASAlbin Sandelin
Albin Sandelin
BLBoris Lenhard
Boris Lenhard
SKShintaro Katayama
Shintaro Katayama
KSKazuro Shimokawa
Kazuro Shimokawa
YHYoshihide Hayashizaki
Yoshihide Hayashizaki

1 June 2013 in RNA Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLina Ma
Lina Ma
VBVladimir Bajic
Vladimir Bajic
ZZZhang Zhang
Zhang Zhang
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been found to perform various functions in a wide variety of important biological processes. To make easier interpretation of lncRNA functionality and conduct de...

11 November 2017 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IKIvan V. Kulakovskiy
Ivan V. Kulakovskiy
IVIlya E Vorontsov
Ilya E Vorontsov
IYIvan S Yevshin
Ivan S Yevshin
RSRuslan Sharipov
Ruslan Sharipov
AFAlla D Fedorova
Alla D Fedorova
VMVsevolod Makeev
Vsevolod Makeev
We present a major update of the HOCOMOCO collection that consists of patterns describing DNA binding specificities for human and mouse transcription factors. In this release, we profited from a nearly doubled volume of published in vivo experiments on transcription factor (TF) binding to expand the repertoire of binding models, replace low-quality models previously based on in vitro data only and cover more than a hundred TFs with previously unknown binding specificities. This was achieved by systematic motif discovery from more than five thousand ChIP-Seq experiments uniformly processed within the BioUML framework with several ChIP-Seq peak calling tools and aggregated in the GTRD database. HOCOMOCO v11 contains binding models for 453 mouse and 680 human transcription factors and includes 1302 mononucleotide and 576 dinucleotide position weight matrices, which describe primary binding preferences of each transcription factor and reliable alternative binding specificities. An interactive interface and bulk downloads are available on the web: http://hocomoco.autosome.ru and http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/hocomoco11. In this release, we complement HOCOMOCO by MoLoTool (Motif Location Toolbox, http://molotool.autosome.ru) that applies HOCOMOCO models for visualization of binding sites in short DNA sequences.

6 January 2016 in WIREs Computational Molecular Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARArwa B. Raies
Arwa B. Raies
VBVladimir Bajic
Vladimir Bajic
Determining the toxicity of chemicals is necessary to identify their harmful effects on humans, animals, plants, or the environment. It is also one of the main steps in drug design. Animal models have been used for a long time for toxicity testing. However, in vivo animal tests are constrained by time, ethical considerations, and financial burden. Therefore, computational methods for estimating the toxicity of chemicals are considered useful. In silico toxicology is one type of toxicity assessment that uses computational methods to analyze, simulate, visualize, or predict the toxicity of chemicals. In silico toxicology aims to complement existing toxicity tests to predict toxicity, prioritize chemicals, guide toxicity tests, and minimize late‐stage failures in drugs design. There are various methods for generating models to predict toxicity endpoints. We provide a comprehensive overview, explain, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of the existing modeling methods and algorithms for toxicity prediction with a particular (but not exclusive) emphasis on computational tools that can implement these methods and refer to expert systems that deploy the prediction models. Finally, we briefly review a number of new research directions in in silico toxicology and provide recommendations for designing in silico models. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2016, 6:147–172. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1240This article is categorized under: Computer and Information Science > Chemoinformatics Computer and Information Science > Databases and Expert Systems Computer and Information Science > Computer Algorithms and Programming

1 March 2010 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TRTimothy Ravasi
Timothy Ravasi
HSHarukazu Suzuki
Harukazu Suzuki
CCCarlo Vittorio Cannistraci
Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci
SKShintaro Katayama
Shintaro Katayama
VBVladimir Bajic
Vladimir Bajic
YHYoshihide Hayashizaki
Yoshihide Hayashizaki