Francesco Schettini

Dr. Francesco Schettini

August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2021 in npj Breast Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco SchettiniFrancesco Schettini
Francesco Schettini
NCNuria Chic
Nuria Chic
FBFara Brasó-Maristany
Fara Brasó-Maristany
LPLaia Paré
Laia Paré
TPTomas Pascual
Tomas Pascual
APAleix Prat
Aleix Prat
Novel antibody-drug conjugates against HER2 are showing high activity in HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) with low HER2 expression (i.e., 1+ or 2+ and lack of ERBB2 amplification). However, the clinical and molecular features of HER2-low BC are yet to be elucidated. Here, we collected retrospective clinicopathological and PAM50 data from 3,689 patients with HER2-negative disease and made the following observations. First, the proportion of HER2-low was higher in HR-positive disease (65.4%) than triple-negative BC (TNBC, 36.6%). Second, within HR-positive disease, ERBB2 and luminal-related genes were more expressed in HER2-low than HER2 0. In contrast, no gene was found differentially expressed in TNBC according to HER2 expression. Third, within HER2-low, ERBB2 levels were higher in HR-positive disease than TNBC. Fourth, HER2-low was not associated with overall survival in HR-positive disease and TNBC. Finally, the reproducibility of HER2-low among pathologists was suboptimal. This study emphasizes the large biological heterogeneity of HER2-low BC, and the need to implement reproducible and sensitive assays to measure low HER2 expression.

13 May 2020 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOlga Martínez-Sáez
Olga Martínez-Sáez
NCNuria Chic
Nuria Chic
TPTomas Pascual
Tomas Pascual
BABarbara Adamo
Barbara Adamo
MVMaría Jesus Vidal
María Jesus Vidal
APAleix Prat
Aleix Prat
Purpose: The therascreenPIK3CAmutation assay and the alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib are FDA-approved for identifying and treating patients with advancedPIK3CA-mutated (PIK3CAmut) breast cancer (BC). However, it is currently unknown to what extend this assay detects mostPIK3CAmutations in BC. This information is critical as patients and clinicians are using this and other genomic assays to indicate alpelisib.Methods: Data from 6338 patients with BC was explored across 10 publicly available studies. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion and distribution ofPIK3CAmutations in BC. Secondary objectives were (1) to evaluate in silico the spectrum ofPIK3CAmutations in BC that would be captured by the therascreen panel; (2) to evaluate the proportion and distribution ofPIK3CAmutations in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−), HER2+, and triple-negative BC (TNBC); and (3) to explore the identification ofPIK3CAmutations in a cohort of 48 HR+/HER2− advanced BC patients by the Guardant B360 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay.Results: Patients withPIK3CAmut tumors represented 35.7% (2261/6338). FivePIK3CAmutations comprised 73% of allPIK3CAmutations: H1047R (35%), E545K (17%), E542K (11%), N345K (6%), and H1047L (4%). Therascreen gene list would capture 72% of allPIK3CAmutations and 80% of patients with a knownPIK3CAmut BC. Among patients with doublePIK3CAmut tumors (12% of allPIK3CAmut), the therascreen panel would capture 78% as harboring 1 singlePIK3CAmutation, 17% asPIK3CAmut undetected, and 5% asPIK3CAdouble-mut.PIK3CAmutation rates were lower in TNBC (16%) compared to HR+/HER2 (42%) and HER2+ (31%) BC; however, the distribution of the 4 mainPIK3CAmutations across subtypes was similar. Finally, 28% ofPIK3CAmutations identified in ctDNA in 48 patients with advanced HR+/HER2− BC were not part of the therascreen panel.Conclusion: PIK3CAmutations in BC are heterogenous and ~ 20% of patients with a knownPIK3CAmutation, and 95% with a known doublePIK3CAmut tumor, would not be captured by the therascreen panel. Finally, the clinical utility ofPIK3CAmutations not present in the therascreen companion diagnostic assay or identified by other sequencing-based assays needs further investigation.

12 December 2018 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco SchettiniFrancesco Schettini
Francesco Schettini
ISIrene De Santo
Irene De Santo
CRCarmen G. Rea
Carmen G. Rea
PPPietro De Placido
Pietro De Placido
LFLuigi Formisano
Luigi Formisano
LMLucia Del Mastro
Lucia Del Mastro
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, namely abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib, interfere with cell cycle progression, induce cell senescence and might promote cancer cell disruption by a cytotoxic T cells-mediated effect. Phase III randomized clinical trials have proven that CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with several endocrine agents improve treatment efficacy over endocrine agents alone for hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on such results, these combinations have been approved for clinical use. Preclinical studies in cell cultures and mouse models proved that CDK4/6i are active against a broad spectrum of solid tumors other than breast cancer, including liposarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, non-small cell lung cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, esophageal cancer, and melanoma. The role of CDK4/6i in monotherapy in several solid tumors is currently under evaluation in phase I, II, and III trials. Nowadays, abemaciclib is the only of the three inhibitors that has received approval as single agent therapy for pretreated HR+ HER2– MBC. Here we review biological, preclinical and clinical data on the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors as single agents in advanced solid tumors.

1 October 2019 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMario Giuliano
Mario Giuliano
Francesco SchettiniFrancesco Schettini
Francesco Schettini
CRCarla Rognoni
Carla Rognoni
MMManuela Milani
Manuela Milani
GJGuy Jerusalem
Guy Jerusalem
DGDaniele Generali
Daniele Generali

1 March 2020 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco SchettiniFrancesco Schettini
Francesco Schettini
TPTomas Pascual
Tomas Pascual
BCBenedetta Conte
Benedetta Conte
NCNuria Chic
Nuria Chic
FBFara Brasó-Maristany
Fara Brasó-Maristany
APAleix Prat
Aleix Prat

1 October 2021 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Francesco SchettiniFrancesco Schettini
Francesco Schettini
APAleix Prat
Aleix Prat
HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) is a heterogenous and multifaceted disease, with interesting therapeutic implications. First, all intrinsic molecular subtypes can be identified in HER2+ tumors, with the HER2-enriched being the most frequent. Such subtypes do not differ much from their counterparts in HER2-negative disease, apart for the high expression of genes in/near the HER2 amplicon on chromosome 17. Intrinsic subtyping, along with the quantification of ERBB2 mRNA levels, is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response across neoadjuvant trials of dual HER2 blockade and might help select patients for de-escalation and escalation treatment strategies. Secondly, HER2+ tumors have a broad range of DNA alterations. ERBB2 mutations and alterations in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway are among the most frequent and might predict benefit from potent pan-HER, PI3K and mTOR inhibitors. Moreover, HER2+ tumors are usually infiltrated by lymphocytes. These tumor infiltrating-lymphocytes (TILs) predict response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2-based treatment and exert a prognostic role. PD-L1, detected in ∼42 % of HER2+ BC, might also be useful to define patients responding to novel anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. New multiparametric clinicopathologic and genomic tools accounting for this complexity, such as HER2DX, are under development to define more tailored treatment approaches. Finally, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) such as trastuzumab deruxtecan might be active in tumors with low expression of HER2. Overall, there is a need to molecularly characterize and develop novel targeted therapies for HER2+ disease.