Marcello Mortillaro

Dr. Marcello Mortillaro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FWFelix Weninger
Felix Weninger
FEFlorian Eyben
Florian Eyben
BSBjörn W. Schuller
Björn W. Schuller
MMMarcello Mortillaro
Marcello Mortillaro
KSKlaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer
Without doubt, there is emotional information in almost any kind of sound received by humans every day: be it the affective state of a person transmitted by means of speech; the emotion intended by a composer while writing a musical piece, or conveyed by a musician while performing it; or the affective state connected to an acoustic event occurring in the environment, in the soundtrack of a movie, or in a radio play. In the field of affective computing, there is currently some loosely connected research concerning either of these phenomena, but a holistic computational model of affect in sound is still lacking. In turn, for tomorrow’s pervasive technical systems, including affective companions and robots, it is expected to be highly beneficial to understand the affective dimensions of “the sound that something makes,” in order to evaluate the system’s auditory environment and its own audio output. This article aims at a first step toward a holistic computational model: starting from standard acoustic feature extraction schemes in the domains of speech, music, and sound analysis, we interpret the worth of individual features across these three domains, considering four audio databases with observer annotations in the arousal and valence dimensions. In the results, we find that by selection of appropriate descriptors, cross-domain arousal, and valence regression is feasible achieving significant correlations with the observer annotations of up to 0.78 for arousal (training on sound and testing on enacted speech) and 0.60 for valence (training on enacted speech and testing on music). The high degree of cross-domain consistency in encoding the two main dimensions of affect may be attributable to the co-evolution of speech and music from multimodal affect bursts, including the integration of nature sounds for expressive effects.

11 November 2010 in Social Psychological and Personality Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarcello Mortillaro
Marcello Mortillaro
MMMarc Mehu
Marc Mehu
KSKlaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer
Positive emotions are crucial to social relationships and social interaction. Although smiling is a frequently studied facial action, investigations of positive emotional expressions are underrepresented in the literature. This may be partly because of the assumption that all positive emotions share the smile as a common signal but lack specific facial configurations. The present study investigated prototypical expressions of four positive emotions—interest, pride, pleasure, and joy. The Facial Action Coding System was used to microcode facial expression of representative samples of these emotions taken from the Geneva Multimodal Emotion Portrayal corpus. The data showed that the frequency and duration of several action units differed between emotions, indicating that actors did not use the same pattern of expression to encode them. The authors argue that an appraisal perspective is suitable to describe how subtly differentiated positive emotional states differ in their prototypical facial expressions.

21 May 2025 in Communications Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKatja Schlegel
Katja Schlegel
NSNils R. Sommer
Nils R. Sommer
MMMarcello Mortillaro
Marcello Mortillaro
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate expertise across diverse domains, yet their capacity for emotional intelligence remains uncertain. This research examined whether LLMs can solve and generate performance-based emotional intelligence tests. Results showed that ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-o1, Gemini 1.5 flash, Copilot 365, Claude 3.5 Haiku, and DeepSeek V3 outperformed humans on five standard emotional intelligence tests, achieving an average accuracy of 81%, compared to the 56% human average reported in the original validation studies. In a second step, ChatGPT-4 generated new test items for each emotional intelligence test. These new versions and the original tests were administered to human participants across five studies (total N = 467). Overall, original and ChatGPT-generated tests demonstrated statistically equivalent test difficulty. Perceived item clarity and realism, item content diversity, internal consistency, correlations with a vocabulary test, and correlations with an external ability emotional intelligence test were not statistically equivalent between original and ChatGPT-generated tests. However, all differences were smaller than Cohen’s d ± 0.25, and none of the 95% confidence interval boundaries exceeded a medium effect size (d ± 0.50). Additionally, original and ChatGPT-generated tests were strongly correlated (r = 0.46). These findings suggest that LLMs can generate responses that are consistent with accurate knowledge about human emotions and their regulation.

1 November 2023 in Journal of Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarcello Mortillaro
Marcello Mortillaro
KSKatja Schlegel
Katja Schlegel
Emotional intelligence (EI) has gained significant popularity as a scientific construct over the past three decades, yet its conceptualization and measurement still face limitations. Applied EI research often overlooks its components, treating it as a global characteristic, and there are few widely used performance-based tests for assessing ability EI. The present paper proposes avenues for advancing ability EI measurement by connecting the main EI components to models and theories from the emotion science literature and related fields. For emotion understanding and emotion recognition, we discuss the implications of basic emotion theory, dimensional models, and appraisal models of emotion for creating stimuli, scenarios, and response options. For the regulation and management of one’s own and others’ emotions, we discuss how the process model of emotion regulation and its extensions to interpersonal processes can inform the creation of situational judgment items. In addition, we emphasize the importance of incorporating context, cross-cultural variability, and attentional and motivational factors into future models and measures of ability EI. We hope this article will foster exchange among scholars in the fields of ability EI, basic emotion science, social cognition, and emotion regulation, leading to an enhanced understanding of the individual differences in successful emotional functioning and communication.

5 March 2021 in Journal of Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDaniel Simonet
Daniel Simonet
KMKatherine Miller
Katherine Miller
KAKevin L. Askew
Kevin L. Askew
KSKenneth Sumner
Kenneth Sumner
MMMarcello Mortillaro
Marcello Mortillaro
KSKatja Schlegel
Katja Schlegel
Drawing upon multidimensional theories of intelligence, the current paper evaluates if the Geneva Emotional Competence Test (GECo) fits within a higher-order intelligence space and if emotional intelligence (EI) branches predict distinct criteria related to adjustment and motivation. Using a combination of classical and S-1 bifactor models, we find that (a) a first-order oblique and bifactor model provide excellent and comparably fitting representation of an EI structure with self-regulatory skills operating independent of general ability, (b) residualized EI abilities uniquely predict criteria over general cognitive ability as referenced by fluid intelligence, and (c) emotion recognition and regulation incrementally predict grade point average (GPA) and affective engagement in opposing directions, after controlling for fluid general ability and the Big Five personality traits. Results are qualified by psychometric analyses suggesting only emotion regulation has enough determinacy and reliable variance beyond a general ability factor to be treated as a manifest score in analyses and interpretation. Findings call for renewed, albeit tempered, research on EI as a multidimensional intelligence and highlight the need for refined assessment of emotional perception, understanding, and management to allow focused analyses of different EI abilities.

18 May 2017
Verified
Book
Closed access
KSKlaus Scherer
Klaus Scherer
MMMarcello Mortillaro
Marcello Mortillaro
MMMarc Mehu
Marc Mehu
Emotion researchers generally concur that most emotions in humans and animals are elicited by the appraisals of events that are highly relevant for the organism, generating action tendencies that are often accompanied by changes in expression, autonomic physiology, and feeling. Scherer’s component process model of emotion (CPM) postulates that individual appraisal checks drive the dynamics and configuration of the facial expression of emotion and that emotion recognition is based on appraisal inference with consequent emotion attribution. This chapter outlines the model and reviews the accrued empirical evidence that supports these claims, covering studies that experimentally induced specific appraisals or that used induction of emotions with typical appraisal configurations (measuring facial expression via electromyographic recording) or behavioral coding of facial action units. In addition, recent studies analyzing the mechanisms of emotion recognition are shown to support the theoretical assumptions.