Onychomycosis is a common fungal nail disease that is difficult to treat topically due to the deep location of the infection under the densely keratinized nail plate. Keratin affinity of topical drugs is an important physicochemical property impacting therapeutic efficacy. To be effective, topical drugs must penetrate the nail bed and retain their antifungal activity within the nail matrix, both of which are adversely affected by keratin binding. We investigated these properties for efinaconazole, a new topical antifungal for onychomycosis, compared with those of the existing topical drugs ciclopirox and amorolfine. The efinaconazole free-drug concentration in keratin suspensions was 14.3%, significantly higher than the concentrations of ciclopirox and amorolfine, which were 0.7% and 1.9%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Efinaconazole was released from keratin at a higher proportion than in the reference drugs, with about half of the remaining keratin-bound efinaconazole removed after washing. In single-dose in vitro studies, efinaconazole penetrated full-thickness human nails into the receptor phase and also inhibited the growth of Trichophyton rubrum under the nail. In the presence of keratin, efinaconazole exhibited fungicidal activity against Trichophyton mentagrophytes comparable to that of amorolfine and superior to that of ciclopirox. In a guinea pig onychomycosis model with T. mentagrophytes infection, an efinaconazole solution significantly decreased nail fungal burden compared to that of ciclopirox and amorolfine lacquers ( P < 0.01). These results suggest that the high nail permeability of efinaconazole and its potent fungicidal activity in the presence of keratin are related to its low keratin affinity, which may contribute to its efficacy in onychomycosis.

To evaluate the combination effects of anti-onychomycosis drugs, the minimum inhibitory concentrations of topical (efinaconazole, luliconazole, and tavaborole) and oral (itraconazole and terbinafine) drugs for Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton interdigitale (8 each, with a total of 16 strains) were determined using the microdilution checkerboard technique based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. No antagonism was observed between the topical and oral drugs against all the tested strains. Efinaconazole with terbinafine exerted a synergistic effect on 43.8% of the strains tested (7/16 strains) and efinaconazole with itraconazole on 12.5% (2/16 strains). Conversely, luliconazole showed no synergistic effect with terbinafine but was synergistically effective with itraconazole against 31.3% of the strains (5/16 strains). Tavaborole showed no synergistic effect with terbinafine and was synergistically effective with itraconazole against 18.8% of the strains (3/16 strains). The results suggest that a combination of topical and oral drugs could be a potential clinical option for onychomycosis treatment, and overall, the efinaconazole and oral drug combination would be the most advantageous among the tested combinations.

Development of new topical drugs requires an animal onychomycosis model that can predict the drug efficacy against moderate to severe human onychomycosis because the severity of onychomycosis varies and affects the drug efficacy. This study established a non-immunosuppressive guinea pig tinea unguium model under 8-week infection condition in addition to a previously reported model under 4-week infection condition. In the tinea unguium model, most fungi were tightly present in the arthrospore form, like in human onychomycosis. The topical formulations of efinaconazole and luliconazole, two azole class anti-onychomycosis drugs, were evaluated for their efficacy in these models. In the untreated group, the nail fungal burden in the 8-week model was higher than that in the 4-week model and the stronger infection intensity affected the efficacy of the drugs, suggesting that the 8-week model was more severe. The 90% efficacy rate (42%) of luliconazole in the 8-week model was significantly lowered than that (83%) in the 4-week model, and its 99% efficacy rates were 0% in both models. Conversely, the 90% and 99% efficacy rates of efinaconazole (92% and 50% in the 4-week model, and 75% and 25% in the 8-week model, respectively) were not significantly different between the two infection durations. In addition, efinaconazole was more effective than luliconazole in reducing the nail fungal burden. Considering the relevance of clinical reports of the effectiveness of efinaconazole on severe onychomycosis, the new severe tinea unguium model would predict drug efficacy against moderate to severe onychomycosis.

To be effective against onychomycosis, topically applied drugs have to reach the infection site at an effective concentration to exert antifungal activity against the parasitic form of dermatophytes. We established a novel in vitro method for predicting drug efficacy at the infection site and verified the method by comparing the efficacy of two azole class topical anti-onychomycosis drugs. To predict drug efficacy in the nail plate, a human nail permeability test was conducted and the activities of the free-drugs in the upper, middle, and lowest layers of the nail plate were determined by measuring the growth inhibitory zone. Efinaconazole permeated the nail more efficiently than luliconazole, and the amount of efinaconazole in the middle and lowest layers was higher compared with that of luliconazole. Efinaconazole demonstrated antifungal activities at the concentrations in all of the nail layers, whereas luliconazole was only active at the concentrations in the upper and middle layers. The results could be explained by differences in their affinity for keratin and nail permeability. The established method enables the evaluation of nail permeability and anti-arthrospore activity of free-drugs in the nail plate to predict drug efficacy. This method will be useful for new topical drug development.