Jennifer D'Souza

Dr. Jennifer D'Souza

TIB – Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
HGHamed Babaei Giglou
Hamed Babaei Giglou
Jennifer D'SouzaJennifer D'Souza
Jennifer D'Souza
SASören Auer
Sören Auer

30 November 2020 in Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASören Auer
Sören Auer
AOAllard Oelen
Allard Oelen
MHMuhammad Haris
Muhammad Haris
MSMarkus Stocker
Markus Stocker
Jennifer D'SouzaJennifer D'Souza
Jennifer D'Souza
MJMohamad Yaser Jaradeh
Mohamad Yaser Jaradeh
The transfer of knowledge has not changed fundamentally for many hundreds of years: It is usually document-based-formerly printed on paper as a classic essay and nowadays as PDF. With around 2.5 million new research contributions every year, researchers drown in a flood of pseudo-digitized PDF publications. As a result research is seriously weakened. In this article, we argue for representing scholarly contributions in a structured and semantic way as a knowledge graph. The advantage is that information represented in a knowledge graph is readable by machines and humans. As an example, we give an overview on the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), a service implementing this approach. For creating the knowledge graph representation, we rely on a mixture of manual (crowd/expert sourcing) and (semi-)automated techniques. Only with such a combination of human and machine intelligence, we can achieve the required quality of the representation to allow for novel exploration and assistance services for researchers. As a result, a scholarly knowledge graph such as the ORKG can be used to give a condensed overview on the state-of-the-art addressing a particular research quest, for example as a tabular comparison of contributions according to various characteristics of the approaches. Further possible intuitive access interfaces to such scholarly knowledge graphs include domain-specific (chart) visualizations or answering of natural language questions.

8 April 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
ABArthur Brack
Arthur Brack
Jennifer D'SouzaJennifer D'Souza
Jennifer D'Souza
AHAnett Hoppe
Anett Hoppe
SASören Auer
Sören Auer
RERalph Ewerth
Ralph Ewerth
We examine the novel task of domain-independent scientific concept extraction from abstracts of scholarly articles and present two contributions. First, we suggest a set of generic scientific concepts that have been identified in a systematic annotation process. This set of concepts is utilised to annotate a corpus of scientific abstracts from 10 domains of Science, Technology and Medicine at the phrasal level in a joint effort with domain experts. The resulting dataset is used in a set of benchmark experiments to (a) provide baseline performance for this task, (b) examine the transferability of concepts between domains. Second, we present a state-of-the-art deep learning baseline. Further, we propose the active learning strategy for an optimal selection of instances from among the various domains in our data. The experimental results show that (1) a substantial agreement is achievable by non-experts after consultation with domain experts, (2) the baseline system achieves a fairly high F1 score, (3) active learning enables us to nearly halve the amount of required training data. Keywords Sequence labelling Information extraction Scientific articles Active learning Scholarly communication Research knowledge graph

28 January 2025
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
HGHamed Babaei Giglou
Hamed Babaei Giglou
Jennifer D'SouzaJennifer D'Souza
Jennifer D'Souza
FEFelix Engel
Felix Engel
SASören Auer
Sören Auer
Ontology Matching (OM), is a critical task in knowledge integration, where aligning heterogeneous ontologies facilitates data interoperability and knowledge sharing. Traditional OM systems often rely on expert knowledge or predictive models, with limited exploration of the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs). We present the LLMs4OM framework, a novel approach to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in OM tasks. This framework utilizes two modules for retrieval and matching, respectively, enhanced by zero-shot prompting across three ontology representations: concept, concept-parent, and concept-children. Through comprehensive evaluations using 20 OM datasets from various domains, we demonstrate that LLMs, under the LLMs4OM framework, can match and even surpass the performance of traditional OM systems, particularly in complex matching scenarios. Our results highlight the potential of LLMs to significantly contribute to the field of OM.

2 October 2024 in Open Conference Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HGHamed Babaei Giglou
Hamed Babaei Giglou
Jennifer D'SouzaJennifer D'Souza
Jennifer D'Souza
SASören Auer
Sören Auer
This paper outlines the LLMs4OL 2024, the first edition of the Large Language Models for Ontology Learning Challenge. LLMs4OL is a community development initiative collocated with the 23rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) to explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Ontology Learning (OL), a vital process for enhancing the web with structured knowledge to improve interoperability. By leveraging LLMs, the challenge aims to advance understanding and innovation in OL, aligning with the goals of the Semantic Web to create a more intelligent and user-friendly web. In this paper, we give an overview of the 2024 edition of the LLMs4OL challenge and summarize the contributions.

30 November 2021
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SKSalomon Kabongo
Salomon Kabongo
Jennifer D'SouzaJennifer D'Souza
Jennifer D'Souza
SASören Auer
Sören Auer