Mauricio Carvallo Aceves

Mauricio Carvallo Aceves


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2016 in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAnas Sebti
Anas Sebti
MAMauricio Carvallo Aceves
Mauricio Carvallo Aceves
SBSaad Bennis
Saad Bennis
MFMusandji Fuamba
Musandji Fuamba
Implementing best management practices (BMP) on watersheds could help mitigate the effects of urbanization and climate change on the hydrological cycle. Techniques such as retention ponds, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, and green roofs vary in technical performance, space requirements, and cost. The trade-offs between these present a challenge toward BMP selection and placement, therefore requiring optimization. Three optimization methods were applied for BMP implementation on a combined sewer: linear programming (LP); genetic algorithm (GA); and simulated annealing (SA). LP served as a reference point. The SA solution was only marginally better, 4.7% cheaper, whereas GA’s solution was 17.9% more expensive after computations froze at a local minimum; both methods required approximately 18 h of computational time. A second round of optimization used the solution from LP as a starting point. This modification significantly increased the performance of GA, providing a new solution that was 14% ...

6 February 2016 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMauricio Carvallo Aceves
Mauricio Carvallo Aceves
MFMusandji Fuamba
Musandji Fuamba
The selection of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for mitigating the effects of urbanization on the hydrological cycle could be a complex process due to conflicting stakeholder views, and varying levels of performance of BMPs across a range of criteria (runoff reduction, erosion control, etc.). Part 1 of this article proposed a methodology based on the application of multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) methods, which was tested here on a residential stormwater network in the Montreal area. The case study considered green roofs, rain gardens, rain barrels and pervious pavement over a range of economic, social, and water quality and quantity criteria by applying 4 MCDA methods under three different stakeholder views. The results indicated Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Réalité (ELECTRE) III to be the most appropriate method for the methodology, presenting flexibility concerning threshold values, criteria weights, and showing shared top choices across stakeholders (rain gardens, and rain gardens in combination with pervious pavement). The methodology shows potential for more formal applications and research opportunities. Future work may lie in the inclusion of multiple objective optimization, better stakeholder engagement, estimation of economic benefits, water quality modeling, long-term hydrological simulations, and estimating real BMP pollutant removal rates.

6 February 2016 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMauricio Carvallo Aceves
Mauricio Carvallo Aceves
MFMusandji Fuamba
Musandji Fuamba
The implementation of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) could help re-establish the natural hydrological cycle of watersheds after urbanization, with each BMP presenting a different performance across a range of criteria (flood prevention, pollutant removal, etc.). Additionally, conflicting views from the relevant stakeholders may arise, resulting in a complex selection process. This paper proposes a methodology for BMP selection based on the application of multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) methods, integrating multiple stakeholder priorities and BMP combinations. First, in the problem definition, the MCDA methods, relevant criteria and design guidelines are selected. Next, information from the preliminary analysis of the watershed is used to obtain a list of relevant BMPs. The third step comprises the watershed modeling and analysis of the BMP alternatives to obtain performance values across purely objective criteria. Afterwards, a stakeholder analysis based on survey applications is carried out to obtain social performance values and criteria priorities. Then, the MCDA methods are applied to obtain the final BMP rankings. The last step considers the sensitivity analysis and rank comparisons in order to draw the final conclusions and recommendations. Future improvements to the methodology could explore inclusion of multiple objective analysis, and alternative means for obtaining social performance values.

1 January 2017 in Journal of Water Management Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMauricio Carvallo Aceves
Mauricio Carvallo Aceves
MMMontréal Polytechnique Montreal
Montréal Polytechnique Montreal
MFMusandji Fuamba
Musandji Fuamba
JAJessica Angui
Jessica Angui
The need to provide adequate water quality control using best management practices (BMPs) requires accurate modeling in order to determine their ideal placemen…