John Pauling

Dr. John Pauling

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2020 in Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Michael HughesMichael Hughes
Michael Hughes
YAYannick Allanore
Yannick Allanore
LCLorinda Chung
Lorinda Chung
JPJohn Pauling
John Pauling
CDChristopher P. Denton
Christopher P. Denton
MMMarco Matucci-Cerinic
Marco Matucci-Cerinic

16 August 2019 in Clinical Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJohn Pauling
John Pauling
Michael HughesMichael Hughes
Michael Hughes
JPJanet E Pope
Janet E Pope

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShaney Barratt
Shaney Barratt
VFVictoria A. Flower
Victoria A. Flower
JPJohn Pauling
John Pauling
AMAnn Millar
Ann Millar
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a group of heterogeneous diseases characterised by varying degrees of aberrant inflammation and fibrosis of the lung parenchyma. This may occur in isolation, such as in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or as part of a wider disease process affecting multiple organs, such as in systemic sclerosis. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is one component of an existing broad-spectrum therapeutic option in IPF (nintedanib) and may become part of the emerging therapeutic strategy for other ILDs in the future. This article describes our current understanding of VEGF biology in normal lung homeostasis and how changes in its bioavailability may contribute the pathogenesis of ILD. The complexity of VEGF biology is particularly highlighted with an emphasis on the potential non-vascular, non-angiogenic roles for VEGF in the lung, in both health and disease.

1 April 2020 in Autoimmunity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael HughesMichael Hughes
Michael Hughes
JPJohn Pauling
John Pauling
LALaura Armstrong-James
Laura Armstrong-James
CDChristopher P. Denton
Christopher P. Denton
PGPaul Galdas
Paul Galdas
CFCaroline Flurey
Caroline Flurey

4 February 2017 in Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLesley-Anne Bissell
Lesley-Anne Bissell
MAMarina Anderson
Marina Anderson
MBMalcolm Burgess
Malcolm Burgess
KCKuntal Chakravarty
Kuntal Chakravarty
GCGerry Coghlan
Gerry Coghlan
MBMaya H. Buch
Maya H. Buch
Objective. Cardiac disease in SSc can manifest in various ways and is associated with a poor prognosis. There is little evidence on how best to detect and manage cardiac disease in SSc. Our objective was to produce an expert consensus best practice pathway for the management of cardiac disease in SSc. Methods. The UK Systemic Sclerosis Study Group set up several working groups to develop a number of consensus best practice pathways for the management of SSc-specific complications, including cardiac disease. A multidisciplinary task force was convened. The guidelines were partly informed by a comprehensive literature review. Results. A best practice pathway for cardiac disease (with a focus on primary cardiac disease) in SSc is presented, including approaches for early detection and standard pharmacological and device therapies. Due to the benefits, shared care and a multidisciplinary approach are recommended. A future research agenda has been formulated in response to the relative lack of understanding of the natural history of primary cardiac disease that was highlighted by the initiative. Conclusion. The physician should be alert to the possibility of cardiac disease in SSc; it is best managed within a multidisciplinary team including both rheumatologists and cardiologists. This pathway provides a reference for all physicians managing patients with SSc.

13 September 2019 in RMD Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAurélie Najm
Aurélie Najm
Elena NikiphorouElena Nikiphorou
Elena Nikiphorou
MKMarie Kostine
Marie Kostine
CRChristophe Richez
Christophe Richez
JPJohn Pauling
John Pauling
FBFrancis Berenbaum
Francis Berenbaum
Background Mobile health applications (apps) are available to enable people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) to better self-manage their health. However, guidance on the development and evaluation of such apps is lacking. Objectives The objective of this EULAR task force was to establish points to consider (PtC) for the development, evaluation and implementation of apps for self-management of RMDs. Methods A systematic literature review of app content and development strategies was conducted, followed by patient focus group and an online survey. Based on this information and along with task force expert opinion, PtC were formulated in a face-to-face meeting by a multidisciplinary task force panel of experts, including two patient research partners. The level of agreement among the panel in regard to each PtC was established by anonymous online voting. Results Three overarching principles and 10 PtC were formulated. Three PtC are related to patient safety, considered as a critical issue by the panel. Three are related to relevance of the content and functionalities. The requirement for transparency around app development and funding sources, along with involvement of relevant health professionals, were also raised. Ease of app access across ages and abilities was highlighted, in addition to considering the cost benefit of apps from the outset. The level of agreement was from 8.8 to 9.9 out of 10. Conclusion These EULAR PtC provide guidance on important aspects that should be considered for the development, evaluation and implementation of existing and new apps.