Inconsistent definitions of complications and unexpected events have limited accurate analysis of surgical outcomes. Perioperative outcome classifications currently used for adult patients have limitations when used for children. A multidisciplinary group of experts modified the Clavien–Dindo classification to increase its utility and accuracy in paediatric surgery cohorts. Organizational and management errors were considered in the novel Clavien–Madadi classification, which focuses on procedural invasiveness rather than anaesthetic management. Unexpected events were prospectively documented in a paediatric surgery cohort. Results of the Clavien–Dindo and Clavien–Madadi classifications were compared and correlated with procedure complexity. Unexpected events were prospectively documented in a cohort of 17 502 children undergoing surgery between 2017 and 2021. The results of both classifications were highly correlated (ρ = 0.95), although the novel Clavien–Madadi classification identified 449 additional events (organizational and management errors) over the Clavien–Dindo classification, increasing the total number of events by 38 per cent (1605 versus 1158 events). The results of the novel system correlated significantly with the complexity of procedures in children (ρ = 0.756). Furthermore, grading of events > grade III according to the Clavien–Madadi classification showed a higher correlation with procedure complexity (ρ = 0.658) than the Clavien–Dindo classification (ρ = 0.198). The Clavien–Madadi classification is a tool for the detection of surgical and non-medical errors in paediatric surgery populations. Further validation in paediatric surgery populations is required before widespread use.

Previous research has confirmed that patients with choledochal cyst have an elevated risk of cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Current data suggest a risk of malignancy of 6 to 30% in adults with choledochal cyst. Malignancy has also occasionally been identified in children and adolescents. Multiple factors, including the age of the patient, cyst type, histological findings, and localization, have an impact on the prognosis. Information on long-term outcomes after cyst excision is limited. However, recent data suggest a lifelong elevated risk of up to 4% of cancer development following operation. This paper presents a review of the literature on cancer in patients with choledochal cyst before and after excision. A postoperative follow-up concept that consists of annual controls of CA19–9 and abdominal ultrasound is introduced.

(1) Background: Acute cholangitis during the first year after Kasai hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) has a negative impact on patient and native liver survival. There are no consistent guidelines for the definition, treatment, and prophylaxis of cholangitis after HPE. The aim of this study was to develop definition, treatment, and prophylaxis guidelines to allow for expeditious management and for standardization in reporting. (2) Methods: the Delphi method, an extensive literature review, iterative rounds of surveys, and expert panel discussions were used to establish definition, treatment, and prophylaxis guidelines for cholangitis in the first year after HPE. (3) Results: Eight elements (pooled into two groups: clinical and laboratory/imaging) were identified to define cholangitis after HPE. The final proposed definitions for suspected and confirmed cholangitis are a combination of one element, respectively, two elements from each group; furthermore, the finding of a positive blood culture was added to the definition of confirmed cholangitis. The durations for prophylaxis and treatment of suspected and confirmed cholangitis were uniformly agreed upon by the experts. (4) Conclusions: for the first time, an international consensus was found for guidelines for definition, treatment, and prophylaxis for cholangitis during the first year after Kasai HPE. Applicability will need further prospective multicentered studies.

Introduction The majority of pediatric surgeons and hepatologists recommend the centralization of biliary atresia (BA) treatment within experienced liver units. We aimed to investigate whether voluntary self-restriction and acceptance of the need for this change in practice changed the BA referral policy in Germany during the last decade. Materials and Methods In cooperation with pediatric surgeons, gastroenterologists or hepatologists, and pediatric liver transplant units, the 2-year follow-up data of infants with BA born in Germany between 2010 and 2014 were collected using www.bard-online.com or pseudonymized data transfer. Results were compared with our previous analysis of the outcome data of infants with BA born between 2001 and 2005 in Germany. Result Overall, 173 infants with BA were identified, of whom 160 underwent Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE; 92.5%) and 13 (7.5%) underwent primary liver transplantation at 21 German centers. At 2-year follow-up, overall survival was 87.7% (vs. 81.9% in 2001–2005 [p = 0.19]), survival with native liver post-KPE was 29.2% (vs. 22.8% in 2001–2005 [p = 0.24]), and jaundice-free survival with native liver post-KPE was 24.0% (vs. 20.1% in 2001–2005 [p = 0.5]). Compared with the 2001–2005 analysis, all criteria showed improvement but the differences are statistically not significant. Conclusion Our observation shows that KPE management requires improvement in Germany. Centralization of BA patients to German reference liver units is not yet mandatory. However, European and national efforts with regard to the centralization of rare diseases support our common endeavor in this direction. ^* Equal contribution. Received: 27 October 2020 Accepted: 04 January 2021 Publication Date: 04 March 2021 (online) © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Postoperative adverse events may be associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Numerous severity grading systems for these events have been introduced and validated but have not yet been systematically applied in paediatric surgery. This study aimed to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of these classifications in a paediatric cohort. Unexpected events associated with interventional or organizational problems in the department of paediatric surgery during 2017–2020 were prospectively documented daily for all children. Events were classified according to the Clavien–Dindo grading system during monthly morbidity and mortality conferences. All events were also classified according to five additional grading systems: T92, contracted Accordion, expanded Accordion, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)^®. Of 6296 patients, 673 (10.7 per cent) developed adverse events and 240 (35.7 per cent) had multiple events. Overall, 1253 adverse events were identified; of these, 574 (45.2 per cent) were associated with surgical or medical interventions and 679 (54.8 per cent) included organizational problems. The grading systems demonstrated high overall correlation (r_pears = 0.9), with minor differences in sentinel events. The Clavien–Dindo classification offered the most detailed assessment. However, these details had only limited additional value. The CCI^® scores were correlated with other grading systems (r_pears = 0.9) and were useful in analysing multiple events within individual patients. Grading systems demonstrated similar scoring patterns for minor and sentinel events, with none being superior for unexpected events in children. However, the CCI^® can be a major improvement in assessing morbidity in patients with multiple events. Its use is therefore recommended in prospective studies on paediatric surgery.