Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is still referred to as the leading cause of severe and irreversible visual loss world-wide. The disease has a profound effect on quality of life of affected individuals and represents a major socioeconomic challenge for societies due to the exponential increase in life expectancy and environmental risks. Advances in medical research have identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as an important pathophysiological player in neovascular AMD and intraocular inhibition of VEGF as one of the most efficient therapies in medicine. The wide introduction of anti-VEGF therapy has led to an overwhelming improvement in the prognosis of patients affected by neovascular AMD, allowing recovery and maintenance of visual function in the vast majority of patients. However, the therapeutic benefit is accompanied by significant economic investments, unresolved medicolegal debates about the use of off-label substances and overwhelming problems in large population management. The burden of disease has turned into a burden of care with a dissociation of scientific advances and real-world clinical performance. Simultaneously, ground-breaking innovations in diagnostic technologies, such as optical coherence tomography, allows unprecedented high-resolution visualisation of disease morphology and provides a promising horizon for early disease detection and efficient therapeutic follow-up. However, definite conclusions from morphologic parameters are still lacking, and valid biomarkers have yet to be identified to provide a practical base for disease management. The European Society of Retina Specialists offers expert guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic management of neovascular AMD supporting healthcare givers and doctors in providing the best state-of-the-art care to their patients.

A review of treat-and-extend regimens (TERs) with intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents in retinal diseases. There is a lack of consensus on the definition and optimal application of TER in clinical practice. This article describes the supporting evidence and subsequent development of a generic algorithm for TER dosing with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents, considering factors such as criteria for extension. A TER algorithm was developed; TER is defined as an individualized proactive dosing regimen usually initiated by monthly injections until a maximal clinical response is observed (frequently determined by optical coherence tomography), followed by increasing intervals between injections (and evaluations) depending on disease activity. The TER regimen has emerged as an effective approach to tailoring the dosing regimen and for reducing treatment burden (visits and injections) compared with fixed monthly dosing or monthly visits with optical coherence tomography–guided regimens (as-needed or pro re nata). It is also considered a suitable approach in many retinal diseases managed with intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, given that all eyes differ in the need for repeat injections. It is hoped that this practical review and TER algorithm will be of benefit to health care professionals interested in the management of retinal diseases.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend (T&E) versus monthly regimens in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from the TReat and extEND (TREND) study. A 12-month phase 3b visual acuity (VA) assessor-masked, multicenter, randomized, interventional study. Six hundred fifty patients. Treatment-naïve nAMD patients (age, ≥50 years) were randomized 1:1 to receive either a ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E (n = 323) or monthly (n = 327) regimen. The primary objective was to show noninferiority of ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E versus monthly regimen, as assessed by the change in best-corrected VA (BCVA) from baseline to the end of the study. Secondary objectives included change in retinal central subfield thickness (CSFT) from baseline to the end of study, treatment exposure, and safety. Overall, 89.8% (T&E) and 90.2% (monthly) of patients completed the study. Patient demographic and baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment groups. The T&E regimen was noninferior (P < 0.001) to the monthly regimen, with a least squares mean BCVA change from baseline of 6.2 versus 8.1 letters to the end of study, respectively. In both treatment groups, most BCVA improvements occurred during the first 6 months and were maintained until the end of the study. The mean change in CSFT from baseline to the end of study was -169.2 μm and -173.3 μm in the T&E and monthly groups, respectively. Fewer injections were required in patients receiving the T&E (8.7) versus monthly (11.1) regimen, with mean number of postbaseline visits of 8.9 and 11.2, respectively. Types and rates of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. Ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered according to a T&E regimen was statistically noninferior and clinically comparable with a monthly regimen in improving VA from baseline to the end of study. No new safety signals for ranibizumab were identified.